Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,019 posts)
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:02 PM Jan 2014

Company makes good on leaving Colo. over gun laws

Source: AP

CHEYENNE, Wyo. (AP) — One of the country's largest producers of ammunition magazines for guns is leaving Colorado and moving operations to Wyoming and Texas because of new state laws that include restrictions on how many cartridges a magazine can hold.

Erie, Colo.-based Magpul Industries Corp. announced Thursday that it was moving its production, distribution and shipping operations to Cheyenne and its headquarters to Texas, making good on a vow it made to leave Colorado during last year's gun control debate.

"Moving operations to locations that support our culture of individual liberties and personal responsibility is important," Magpul CEO Richard Fitzpatrick said in a statement. "Moving to a true multi-state operation will also allow Magpul to utilize the strengths of both Texas and Wyoming as we continue to expand."

Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead said in a statement that Wyoming offers Magpul "a firm commitment to uphold the Second Amendment."

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/company-makes-good-leaving-colo-over-gun-laws



Denver Post: Magpul announces move to Texas, Wyoming

Casper Star-Tribune: Colorado firearms accessory manufacturer Magpul relocating to Wyoming, Texas

(Cheyenne) Wyoming Tribune Eagle: Ammo manufacturer to relocate to Cheyenne
70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Company makes good on leaving Colo. over gun laws (Original Post) alp227 Jan 2014 OP
How many jobs lost? civillawyer Jan 2014 #1
How many lives not lost? HERVEPA Jan 2014 #2
you do know that Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #10
Jobs lost there, gained somewhere else HERVEPA Jan 2014 #14
More importantly, how many lives saved? PSPS Jan 2014 #3
None. Just some Colorado jobs lost. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #20
There will be more coming along LordGlenconner Jan 2014 #24
Of course. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #63
Apparently no lives saved civillawyer Jan 2014 #40
First link says 200 proud2BlibKansan Jan 2014 #4
does it matter? colorado made the right decision. bowens43 Jan 2014 #7
Yes! Someone gets it! HERVEPA Jan 2014 #16
My only thought is.. civillawyer Jan 2014 #41
Most of the 200 employees are going with the company to WY. intheflow Jan 2014 #50
gun humpers are always welcome in Texas Skittles Jan 2014 #5
whats a gun humper? Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #11
You should know. canuckledragger Jan 2014 #27
how am I harrassing people? Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #31
No apologies needed from me or anyone else. canuckledragger Jan 2014 #33
Thats pretty lame Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #37
That was just a few examples. canuckledragger Jan 2014 #38
I just try and be Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #39
What you're doing is called 'bullying', not 'correcting' canuckledragger Jan 2014 #43
How many times have I alerted in GD? Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #44
Don't like DUers calling out your gundamentalist claptrap, the door is that way. -----------------> Nanjing to Seoul Jan 2014 #45
Nope, I like it here Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #46
That wasn't meant for you. :) Nanjing to Seoul Jan 2014 #48
oops Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #58
what "gundamentalist claptrap" Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #47
That was meant for the same person who doesn't know what a gun hugger is. Nanjing to Seoul Jan 2014 #49
My brain is just not working tonight I guess Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #59
I don't have a dog in this fight but Packerowner740 Jan 2014 #53
the opposite sweetapogee Jan 2014 #54
I'm rather certain you think people may even believe your question is sincere. LanternWaste Jan 2014 #69
good for Colorade. You have to take a stand against the gun nuts bowens43 Jan 2014 #6
If high capacity mags are so dangerous hack89 Jan 2014 #28
Maybe interstate commerice laws? I'm not an expert... reACTIONary Jan 2014 #56
Or it is pure hypocrisy hack89 Jan 2014 #60
I don't think so... reACTIONary Jan 2014 #61
The law was pure security theater hack89 Jan 2014 #62
Running away from change does not stop it. Lint Head Jan 2014 #8
Those are just two of a handful of states... Hulk Jan 2014 #9
Good riddance, then Blue_Tires Jan 2014 #12
Embedded gun trolls will exact their tiny zippered outrage. nt onehandle Jan 2014 #13
I wonder how much money these right-wing leaning companies are gonna waste by moving all the time? Crowman1979 Jan 2014 #15
probably none Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #23
What will happen to these companies when Texas changes their gun laws? Crowman1979 Jan 2014 #17
They'll always have Wyoming! intheflow Jan 2014 #51
Heard a documentary yesterday oldandhappy Jan 2014 #18
It's cost them plenty to make this meaningless stand. n/t Gore1FL Jan 2014 #19
I'd say it's made them millions in new profits NickB79 Jan 2014 #68
This has been very expensive for our party. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #21
Fuck Magpul. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #22
I prefer USGI 20 round myself Duckhunter935 Jan 2014 #32
In truth, it's probably Olympic Arms fault... AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #34
I wonder what kind of offers CC Jan 2014 #25
Good bye and good riddance. SoapBox Jan 2014 #26
MJ - billions of dollars for Iliyah Jan 2014 #29
CO was willing to take Magpul's blood money hack89 Jan 2014 #30
Well, so long. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2014 #35
Wonder if I should pick up magpul stuff now ileus Jan 2014 #36
Yeah, about time Magpul pulled out of Colorado! locks Jan 2014 #42
Too bad for the employees now out of work Packerowner740 Jan 2014 #52
I read above that most are going to WY. it seems it is only an hour or so littlewolf Jan 2014 #55
if anyone lost their jobs in the ammo industry, maybe they can get work in the pot industry.. olddad56 Jan 2014 #57
Yeah the weed will way more than make up for it. hollowdweller Jan 2014 #64
Good Riddance. donheld Jan 2014 #65
Pathetic Death Company moving operations to a more agreeing state! B Calm Jan 2014 #66
They did this as a stunt to draw attention away truthisfreedom Jan 2014 #67
They did it for the $13 million in corporate welfare Viking12 Jan 2014 #70
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
10. you do know that
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:23 PM
Jan 2014

they will still make the magazines and accessories? You also know that there are tens of thousands of 20 and 30 round magazines that are perfectly legal already in the state and they have not killed anybody.

I hope the majority of the 200 that want to are able to move and keep their jobs.

Second company is also moving.

It is the second Colorado company involved in making gun accessories to relocate operations to Wyoming since Colorado's new gun laws were enacted.

HiViz Shooting Systems, a company based in Fort Collins, Colo., that makes gun sights and other accessories, announced earlier that it was moving its core operations to Laramie, about 50 miles west of Cheyenne.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
14. Jobs lost there, gained somewhere else
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:43 PM
Jan 2014

Someday the proliferation of these types of weapons and magazines will be though of as insane.
Maybe not in my lifetime, but some day.

 

LordGlenconner

(1,348 posts)
24. There will be more coming along
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:03 PM
Jan 2014

This is a state that's got it going on for a lot of reasons. Tourism, infrastructure, economy.

It will survive.


 

civillawyer

(55 posts)
40. Apparently no lives saved
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:02 PM
Jan 2014

Because Magpul is taking their show on the road. Just thinking about the workers.

 

civillawyer

(55 posts)
41. My only thought is..
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:04 PM
Jan 2014

that Magpul is going to continue what it's doing elsewhere. Colorado made its point.

intheflow

(28,463 posts)
50. Most of the 200 employees are going with the company to WY.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 09:20 PM
Jan 2014

It's only about an hour north of where they work now. Not really a big deal out here. I, personally, commute an hour each way to my job, and I live one town over from Erie.

canuckledragger

(1,636 posts)
27. You should know.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:12 PM
Jan 2014

Here you are again harassing people that show even a hint of a negative gun attitude.

Why feign ignorance when your apologist attitude is so well known?

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
31. how am I harrassing people?
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:27 PM
Jan 2014

can you post some examples please?

When have i been an apologist, again can you post some examples?

when you can not, please apologize to me

canuckledragger

(1,636 posts)
33. No apologies needed from me or anyone else.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:44 PM
Jan 2014

Here you are harrasing a few folks, under the guise of 'waaah, you're not following the RULES!!11!'

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024177270

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024176875

...and whining about it when you've been exposed.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
37. Thats pretty lame
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 07:03 PM
Jan 2014

I posted on what the rules were in GD at that time. After Skinner ruled to open guns back up I had no issues. It was not whining as you say, I pointed out the OP already had one thread locked.

If that's harassment, news to me

By the way those people are the same ones that block people from their "safe zone" for not "following the rule" , nice double standard.

canuckledragger

(1,636 posts)
38. That was just a few examples.
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 07:09 PM
Jan 2014

You tend to try and bully anyone that puts your 'precious' in a negative light, carefully toeing the line so that you don't get your posts hidden and a potential ban.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
39. I just try and be
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 07:37 PM
Jan 2014

respectful of others viewpoints. I do correct some that put out obvious false information by posting links to the correct information. I hope that is one of the reasons I have not had posts hidden. Some others around here do not ever want to hear an opposing viewpoint and have even been given a "safe haven" for their discussion. I have been alerted on but some of the jury comments were kind of sorry. Some like "I like free speech unless it is from a gun owner, they should not be allowed that right so I voted to hide". Something like that, I do not remember exact words.

canuckledragger

(1,636 posts)
43. What you're doing is called 'bullying', not 'correcting'
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:14 PM
Jan 2014

The 'safe haven' you mentioned is the result of your careful toeing the line, which I mentioned up above.

You have been alerted on because of this.

You are not being persecuted for "I like free speech unless it is from a gun owner, they should not be allowed that right"

You do not offer an opposing viewpoint, you try to censor others' posts that you don't agree with with your interpretation of 'the rules.'

typical projection on your part.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
44. How many times have I alerted in GD?
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:45 PM
Jan 2014

since you seem to know so much about me and how I think.

I tend to alert very little and I do not think I have alerted about guns in GD since that GUNZ post before Skinner allowed guns back in GD. I think the exception is over again and I have not alerted.

I was blocked in that "safe haven" after a couple of posts the hosts did not like, no warning no appeal.

I try and being civil and I guess I am doing it right since my posts are net being hidden.

As a gun owner, I have been called names, called a killer, a future murderer. And correcting is pointing out with citation where another poster is putting out false information. At least I link to a source. Most on the other side of the issue do not. They just yell "NRA talking points" and leave it there without any proof I said anything wrong.

I have never tried to censor anyone and I find that very distressing that you would say that. I have said several times I am sure you know that gun topics would best be discussed in the two gun forums. That is not censoring ANYONE. I may not agree with someones post but I do not want it censored. I would like the posters to follow the rules of the forum as posted.

No projection here and I am glad to be here and hope to be around for a very long time.

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
45. Don't like DUers calling out your gundamentalist claptrap, the door is that way. ----------------->
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:45 PM
Jan 2014

Please see yourself out.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
46. Nope, I like it here
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 09:11 PM
Jan 2014

I like the challenge. I do have to admit it is very hard at times to not sink to that level. I respect others opinions, may not agree. I try and hold myself up to a high level and seem to be doing it OK as I have none or at the most very few hidden posts. I do not remember any. I would assume that makes me a civil individual.

Just because I do not agree with some on one topic I guess I an not welcome. Guess I should not have voted democratic my whole adult life. Tried to vote out my very RED congress critters.

Packerowner740

(676 posts)
53. I don't have a dog in this fight but
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 09:46 PM
Jan 2014

Aren't you the one doing the harassing with the "gun humper" and "precious" comments? I am all for improved background checks, reporting of mental illness, enforcement of all gun laws currently on the books and spending some money on PSAs to educate and cut down on accidents but calling the other side names does nothing but inflame the other parties and cause them to dig in harder.

Also get some sensible gun and ammo storage on the books.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
69. I'm rather certain you think people may even believe your question is sincere.
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 10:08 AM
Jan 2014

I'm rather certain you think people may even believe your question is sincere.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
28. If high capacity mags are so dangerous
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:16 PM
Jan 2014

Why did CO allow Magpul to continue to manufacture them for sale in other states? Looks like tax money was more important than lives in other states.

reACTIONary

(5,770 posts)
56. Maybe interstate commerice laws? I'm not an expert...
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:32 PM
Jan 2014

... so I don't know if that would an impediment, but it might be. Seems reasonable for a state to focus on limiting sales in their own state.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
60. Or it is pure hypocrisy
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:09 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:50 PM - Edit history (1)

Political grandstanding at home while ensuring the tax money keeps flowing.

reACTIONary

(5,770 posts)
61. I don't think so...
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:34 PM
Jan 2014

... I wouldn't characterize it as "political grandstanding" in the first place. It's an honest and reasonable attempt to increase public safety for the citizens of the state. And I think it's pretty unlikely tax revenue would be affected any significant way, one way or another. I think their restraint might be explained in a couple of ways. Further restrictions on the company may not have been politically feasible, and I think the state legislature has a proper notion of the proper limits of a state's actions with respect to other states.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
62. The law was pure security theater
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 11:41 PM
Jan 2014

It does not ban possession of high capacity mags purchased prior to the ban. Additionally, since mags have no date of manufacture stamp, a CO resident can simply buy mags out of state and the cops would never know they were illegal.

So explain to me how it increased public safety - there are just as many high cap mags in CO now as there were before the "ban".

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
9. Those are just two of a handful of states...
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:17 PM
Jan 2014

...I tend to drive through as quickly as possible. Because Texas is so damned big, it takes two days. Wyoming, on the other hand, happens to have a big piece of Yellowstone on it's property, or it would be a totally worthless piece of real estate.

Good for Wyoming and Texas. Another reason, albeit small, why anyone would want to live in those two God forsaken pieces of land.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
12. Good riddance, then
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:28 PM
Jan 2014

Magpul's incessant whining the entire year was just a notch or two below Boeing, and that's really saying something...

Crowman1979

(3,844 posts)
15. I wonder how much money these right-wing leaning companies are gonna waste by moving all the time?
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:43 PM
Jan 2014

Pretty soon there will be nowhere in the world to run to...hopefully.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
23. probably none
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:01 PM
Jan 2014

Randy Bruns, CEO of Cheyenne's economic development organization, said it is working with Magpul on a financial package that could include up to $13 million in state grants and loans to help the company move to Cheyenne.

And any losses if they happen will just be written off in taxes

Crowman1979

(3,844 posts)
17. What will happen to these companies when Texas changes their gun laws?
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:45 PM
Jan 2014

Those snarkey a-holes will have no place to go.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
18. Heard a documentary yesterday
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jan 2014

about the number of jobs being created in Colo in the grow industry. One man said he would be doubling his staff. The state will pick up lots of dollars in taxes on weed.

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
68. I'd say it's made them millions in new profits
Fri Jan 3, 2014, 08:45 AM
Jan 2014

I'm sure Wyoming and Texas gave them great tax breaks to relocate, and the publicity they've received on their stand has catapulted them to stardom amongst gun owners.

Making good on their threat to move will get them enough business to stay backordered for YEARS.

CC

(8,039 posts)
25. I wonder what kind of offers
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:10 PM
Jan 2014

Wyoming and specially Cheyenne made them beyond the supposed 2nd amendment deal bull. I was out that way Fall 2012 and Cheyenne was almost a ghost town with so many businesses shut down. It was depressing for someone that used to love going there when visiting family. Even the SO's favorite boot store was gone. As for TX I know Perry has been criss-crossing the country offering businesses tax, lending and deregulation deals to get them to move to his state. He was trying hard to get Beretta USA to leave MD with business sweet deals and the excuse of stricter gun laws to use to justify the move. Beretta ran the numbers and it couldn't justify the move financially even with all the breaks. From the article logistics came into play and I can see where shipping to and from Cheyenne would be easier than Erie.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
29. MJ - billions of dollars for
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:17 PM
Jan 2014

CO, plus thousand of jobs and money for schools, hospitals, child care. Gun company - profit for self.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
30. CO was willing to take Magpul's blood money
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 06:19 PM
Jan 2014

By specifically allowing them to continue to manufacture them in CO for sale in other states. I guess only CO lives matter to them.

locks

(2,012 posts)
42. Yeah, about time Magpul pulled out of Colorado!
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 08:11 PM
Jan 2014

I'd sure rather live in the state that voted in some reasonable gun control and is the first to legalize marijuana than in one like Wyoming which won't even consider either. In Colorado more people die from guns than in auto accidents. From marijuana, nobody.

littlewolf

(3,813 posts)
55. I read above that most are going to WY. it seems it is only an hour or so
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:09 PM
Jan 2014

away from where they are now. so CO loses the tax base.

olddad56

(5,732 posts)
57. if anyone lost their jobs in the ammo industry, maybe they can get work in the pot industry..
Thu Jan 2, 2014, 10:38 PM
Jan 2014

good fro Colorado, in with the good and out with the bad.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Company makes good on lea...