Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 08:39 PM Jan 2014

Boehner’s response to West Virginia’s chemical spill: “We have enough regulations”

Source: Salon



"What the administration ought to be doing is their jobs," the House Speaker commented Tuesday

LINDSAY ABRAMS


The leak of a toxic chemical from a West Virginia coal processing plant into the state’s water system unleashed an onslaught of commentary calling for increased government regulation and industry oversight. As Randy Huffman, secretary of the state’s Department of Environmental Protection, predicted in the spill’s aftermath: “I think a lot of folks will be calling for legislation and rightly so.”

“Somebody ought to be held accountable here,” agreed House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. In his opinion, however, that somebody is the Obama administration.

“We have enough regulations on the books,” Boehner commented at a press conference Tuesday. “What the administration ought to be doing is their jobs. Why was this plant not inspected since 1991?”

(The answer, Climate Progress notes, is that a loophole in West Virginia’s regulations makes it so that inspections weren’t required by law.)



Read more: http://www.salon.com/2014/01/14/boehners_response_to_west_virginias_chemical_spill_we_have_enough_regulations/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boehner’s response to West Virginia’s chemical spill: “We have enough regulations” (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2014 OP
Because, Johnny Boy... Bryce Butler Jan 2014 #1
Ah, Yes...... Grassy Knoll Jan 2014 #2
Well hey Boner if you want.. SummerSnow Jan 2014 #3
The man is morally bankrupt n/t albino65 Jan 2014 #4
Garble garble, mumble mumble...regumalations baaaaddd.... fujiyama Jan 2014 #5
"Doing their jobs"? Cleaning up after reckless corporations? louis-t Jan 2014 #6

Bryce Butler

(338 posts)
1. Because, Johnny Boy...
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 08:42 PM
Jan 2014

the plant is not subject to federal inspection because it only stores the chemical, it doesn't produce it. Why is this here? Because idiots like you make sure there are loopholes big enough to fly a 747 through when this stuff is written.

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
3. Well hey Boner if you want..
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 08:47 PM
Jan 2014

to know why it wasn't inspected in 1991 go ask papa Bush who was President then,

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
5. Garble garble, mumble mumble...regumalations baaaaddd....
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 09:12 PM
Jan 2014

Waaahhhh!

That's all I hear. Maybe in his head it was half way coherent but I doubt it.


louis-t

(23,309 posts)
6. "Doing their jobs"? Cleaning up after reckless corporations?
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 10:08 PM
Jan 2014

Using taxpayer money? I see, privatize the profit, socialize the risk. Yeah, I read that book, too.
Asshole.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Boehner’s response to Wes...