WikiLeaks Release: Administration Seen as Retreating on Environment in Talks on Pacific Trade
Source: WikiLeaks / New York Times
@wikileaks: RELEASE: WikiLeaks releases long sought Trans-Pacific Partnership (#TPP) #Environment draft http://t.co/iWw0yotOcv
Press release: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)
Today, 15 January 2014, WikiLeaks released the secret draft text for the entire TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Environment Chapter and the corresponding Chairs' Report. The TPP transnational legal regime would cover 12 countries initially and encompass 40 per cent of global GDP and one-third of world trade. The Environment Chapter has long been sought by journalists and environmental groups. The released text dates from the Chief Negotiators' summit in Salt Lake City, Utah, on 19-24 November 2013.
The Environment Chapter covers what the Parties propose to be their positions on: environmental issues, including climate change, biodiversity and fishing stocks; and trade and investment in 'environmental' goods and services. It also outlines how to resolve enviromental disputes arising out of the treaty's subsequent implementation. The draft Consolidated Text was prepared by the Chairs of the Environment Working Group, at the request of TPP Ministers at the Brunei round of the negotiations.
When compared against other TPP chapters, the Environment Chapter is noteworthy for its absence of mandated clauses or meaningful enforcement measures. The dispute settlement mechanisms it creates are cooperative instead of binding; there are no required penalties and no proposed criminal sanctions.. With the exception of fisheries, trade in 'environmental' goods and the disputed inclusion of other multilateral agreements, the Chapter appears to function as a public relations exercise.
Julian Assange, WikiLeaks' publisher, stated: "Today's WikiLeaks release shows that the public sweetner in the TPP is just media sugar water. The fabled TPP environmental chapter turns out to be a toothless public relations exercise with no enforcement mechanism."
The Chairs' Report of the Environment Working Group also shows that there are still significant areas of contention in the Working Group. The report claims that the draft Consolidated Text displays much compromise between the Parties already, but more is needed to reach a final text. The main areas of contention listed include the role of this agreement with respect to multilateral environmental agreements and the dispute resolution process.
Read more: http://wikileaks.org/tpp-enviro/pressrelease.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/us/politics/administration-is-seen-as-retreating-on-environment-in-talks-on-pacific-trade.html
Administration Is Seen as Retreating on Environment in Talks on Pacific Trade
By CORAL DAVENPORT
January 15, 2014
WASHINGTON The Obama administration is retreating from previous demands of strong international environmental protections in order to reach agreement on a sweeping Pacific trade deal that is a pillar of President Obamas strategic shift to Asia, according to documents obtained by WikiLeaks, environmentalists and people close to the contentious trade talks.
The negotiations over the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would be one of the worlds biggest trade agreements, have exposed deep rifts over environmental policy between the United States and 11 other Pacific Rim nations. As it stands now, the documents, viewed by The New York Times, show that the disputes could undo key global environmental protections.
The environmental chapter of the trade deal has been among the most highly disputed elements of negotiations in the pact. Participants in the talks, which have dragged on for three years, had hoped to complete the deal by the end of 2013.
Environmentalists said that the draft appears to signal that the United States will retreat on a variety of environmental protections including legally binding pollution control requirements and logging regulations and a ban on harvesting sharks fins to advance a trade deal that is a top priority for Mr. Obama.
MORE AT LINK
glowing
(12,233 posts)agreement. This is one of the worst deals to come about since NAFTA and CAFTA. It's going to be any vestige of a quality life in any of these countries to be flushed down the toilet.
valerief
(53,235 posts)At the cost of everyone and everything else.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I don't care what the apologists say.
pam4water
(2,916 posts)Overseas
(12,121 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)pam4water
(2,916 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)should learn to fight.