U.S. Supreme Court to hear woman's claim to $3.4M from Texas man who owned child-porn photos of her
Source: Associated Press
A woman whose childhood rapes by her uncle were captured on camera and widely traded on the Internet wants the Supreme Court to make it easier for victims of child pornography to collect money from people who view the brutal images on their computers.
The case being argued at the Supreme Court on Wednesday involves a Texas man who pleaded guilty to having images of children engaged in sex acts on his computer. Doyle Randall Paroline is appealing an order holding him responsible for the full amount of losses, nearly $3.4 million, suffered by the woman known as Amy. Of the several hundred incriminating images on Paroline's computer, just two were of Amy.
Advocates for child pornography victims say that holding defendants liable for the entire amount of losses better reflects the ongoing harm that victims suffer each time someone views the images online. The threat of a large financial judgment, coupled with a prison term, also might deter some people from looking at the images in the first place, the advocates say.
"The threat that a person in the child pornography market may well bear the entire cost of the harm done to the victim, even if they are a 'minor player,' is likely to be a large deterrent, especially when the harm done typically runs into the millions for a victim's lifetime of care," said Marci Hamilton, a law professor at Yeshiva University. Hamilton wrote a brief in the case on behalf of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children.
Read more: http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2014/01/supreme_court_to_hear_womans_c.html#incart_river_default
= new reply since forum marked as read
Huh??
maybe he ought to be getting a much bigger bill.
But he has a simple solution: if he doesn't want to pay it all himself, he just has to point out all the people who deserve to share it with him. It's his own problem if he can't do that... 
