Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,618 posts)
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 01:56 PM Jan 2014

House passes farm bill, crop subsidies preserved

Source: AP-EXCITE

By MARY CLARE JALONICK

WASHINGTON (AP) - After more than two years of partisan squabbles over food and farm policy, the House passed and sent to the Senate Wednesday an almost $100 billion-a-year, compromise farm bill containing a small cut in food stamps and preserving most crop subsidies.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said shortly after the vote that President Barack Obama would sign the bill if it reaches his desk.

The measure, which the House approved 251-166, had solid backing from the Republican leadership team, even though it makes smaller cuts to food stamps than they would have liked. The bill would cut about $800 million a year from the $80 billion-a-year program, or around 1 percent. The House had sought a 5 percent cut.

The legislation also would continue to heavily subsidize major crops for the nation's farmers while eliminating some subsidies and shifting them toward more politically defensible insurance programs.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140129/DABKJGV83.html





In this July 9, 2009 file photo three combines harvest the winter wheat on the Cooksey farm near Roggen, Colo. Farm-state lawmakers are pushing for final passage of the massive, five-year farm bill as it heads to the House floor Wednesday — member by member, vote by vote. There are goodies scattered through the bill for members from all regions of the country: a boost in money for crop insurance popular in the Midwest; higher cotton and rice subsidies for Southern farmers; renewal of federal land payments for Western states. There are cuts to the food stamp program — $800 million a year, or around 1 percent — for Republicans who say the program is spending too much money, but they are low enough that some Democrats will support them. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski, File)

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
1. Republicons have FAILED to give America a Farm Bill for so frikking long
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 02:14 PM
Jan 2014

...The Republicon House has been just pathetic in the way it has treated America's farmers.

This new bill -- part of the RepubliDump -- is plug ugly. But at least, finally, even if ultra-crappy in a thousands ways, it's something.



Omaha Steve

(99,618 posts)
4. My congressman: Rep. (R) Jeff Fortenberry: 'Missed opportunity' on farm-subsidy limits in ag bill
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 02:46 PM
Jan 2014

Marta and I both called his office yesterday and asked him to vote NO because of the Food Stamp reduction.

http://www.omaha.com/article/20140129/NEWS/140128497/1016#rep-jeff-fortenberry-missed-opportunity-on-farm-subsidy-limits-in-ag-bill

By Joseph Morton

WASHINGTON — Proposed new limits on farm subsidy payments have been “plowed under” in the final farm bill compromise, Rep. Jeff Fortenberry said Tuesday.

“It's a huge missed opportunity,” the Republican from Lincoln told The World-Herald. “It's a big disappointment.”

He and Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, successfully pushed to include a $250,000 hard cap on subsidy payments in the House and Senate farm bills. They also tightened loopholes on the requirement that subsidy recipients be “actively engaged” in the farming operation.

In the end, however, the conference committee members responsible for negotiating the final version changed the limits to the point of making them meaningless, Grassley said after seeing the language.

FULL story at link.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
5. Ah yes subsidizing the "free market" where too big to fail is the law.
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jan 2014

I thought "free market" meant that if you failed you went out of business. Subsidizing feed corn is subsidizing the meat industry. Meat is not a necessity ...but hey ...I luv a good steak too ...and after looking at how chickens are processed and what they feed them and how they are treated I know I am eating shit that ain't good for me ...and it is not a necessity. Want and need are NOT the same thing. If we are going subsidize anything it should be organic farms and solar power ...just enough to help them get going. So see I am a hypocrite with my own favorites but I feel justified in that we "need" good food and clean water and clean power.

lark

(23,097 posts)
8. Obama should just veto the damn thing. So disappointed.
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 04:55 PM
Jan 2014

I can't stand it that he and other corporate dems will approve this bill so that the rich landowners will continue to get everything they didn't earn to begin with. the cutting should have come from that part of the bill, not the part that let's people eat. Sickening!

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
9. On the plus side, there is hemp provision included in there.
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jan 2014

It allows universities and ag departments to do research on hemp production in states where it is legal (10 of them).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House passes farm bill, c...