Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:06 PM Jan 2014

Death penalty decision looms for Boston bomb suspect

Source: Reuters

BY RICHARD VALDMANIS
BOSTON Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:16pm EST

(Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department will decide this week whether to seek the death penalty for suspected Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, accused of setting off two pressure-cooker bombs at the finish line of the world-renowned race.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that he would announce his decision before a Friday deadline set by a U.S. District Court Judge in Boston.

Tsarnaev, a 20-year-old ethnic Chechen, is accused of detonating the home-made bombs along with his older brother, Tamerlan, who was killed during a shootout with police several days after the April 15 attack.

Three people, including an 8-year-old boy, were killed in the blasts, which marked the worst attack on U.S. soil since September 11, 2001. Another 264 people were injured by shrapnel, many of them losing limbs.

-snip-



Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/29/us-usa-explosions-boston-idUSBREA0S24720140129

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Death penalty decision looms for Boston bomb suspect (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2014 OP
It's not really a tough decision. PeteSelman Jan 2014 #1
". . . which marked the worst attack on U.S. soil since September 11, 2001." another_liberal Jan 2014 #2
^^^ This. MH1 Jan 2014 #12
The death penalty is wrong in all cases. Gore1FL Jan 2014 #3
+1 Scootaloo Jan 2014 #8
The victims wishes should be respected flamingdem Jan 2014 #4
I agree davidpdx Jan 2014 #14
They have - and there is support for both sides of the issue. hack89 Jan 2014 #22
Is he still in solitary confinement? jakeXT Jan 2014 #5
Easy - Boston people , when polled, asked for life in prison. MA has abolished death penalty in 1984 Mass Jan 2014 #6
If he's convicted, that's too good for him.Let him rot for decades staring at the walls of his cell. abq e streeter Jan 2014 #7
And I'm still against the death penalty. marble falls Jan 2014 #9
Whatever the decision, I hope his life is short, TheCowsCameHome Jan 2014 #10
Fine, give him life and general population. 7962 Jan 2014 #11
Charming. n/t Comrade Grumpy Jan 2014 #13
Amazing how the keyboard commandos turn into right wing revenge baiters warrant46 Jan 2014 #16
You dont have to be "right wing" to support the death penalty. Read the # of supportive posts. 7962 Jan 2014 #18
I certainly wasn't referring to you warrant46 Jan 2014 #19
Thanks. And the bell? Thats why I want the laws changed. No more grandstanding DAs. 7962 Jan 2014 #20
A disappointingly lot of rush to judgment here. snot Jan 2014 #15
I don't want to kill him. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #21
"the government might have a completely erroneous story" soundsgreat Jan 2014 #17

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
1. It's not really a tough decision.
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:11 PM
Jan 2014

He indiscriminately killed three people and maimed many more. Without a second thought. He's got to go and right soon. No dallying for years on end. There's no point, he's absolutely guilty. This is a no doubt about it case. There is no chance they'll be getting the wrong guy.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
2. ". . . which marked the worst attack on U.S. soil since September 11, 2001."
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:15 PM
Jan 2014

The scores of people killed in several mass shootings don't count, of course.

Gore1FL

(21,132 posts)
3. The death penalty is wrong in all cases.
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:17 PM
Jan 2014

I'd prefer him to live a long boring life of reflection in a cell next to Terry Nichols and Zacarias Moussaoui.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
8. +1
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:53 PM
Jan 2014

I look forward to the day that at least progressive Americans can tell the difference between revenge and justice.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
14. I agree
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 02:59 AM
Jan 2014

A long trial will do no good for the victims and their families, but make them relive that horrible day. If the prosecution is smart they'll put an offer on the table for a very limited time allowing him to plead guilty in exchange for taking the death penalty off the table.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
22. They have - and there is support for both sides of the issue.
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jan 2014

so either way, some of the victims will not get their wishes respected.

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
5. Is he still in solitary confinement?
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:25 PM
Jan 2014

For now, Tsarnaev is being kept in solitary confinement in a prison near Boston, without access to media or prayer services, as per a government "Special Administrative Measure" designed to prevent incarcerated terrorists from inciting violence. The measure also prevents him from speaking confidentially with his lawyers, and prohibits them from discussing their conversations with Tsarnaev, or relaying messages from him.

Tsarnaev's lawyers challenged that measure last month and argued at Tuesday's hearing that it prevented them from building a fair case in his defense.

"This is not a level playing field," defense attorney Miriam Conrad told the court. "It appears the government is trying to retain every possible advantage in this case for itself."

"I agree enough with the defendant," Judge O'Toole said, according to ABC News. "It may concern adequate preparation for the case."

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2013/1112/Is-Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-getting-fair-trial-Judge-sympathetic-to-concerns.-video

Mass

(27,315 posts)
6. Easy - Boston people , when polled, asked for life in prison. MA has abolished death penalty in 1984
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:30 PM
Jan 2014
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/29/us-usa-explosions-boston-idUSBREA0S24720140129

May be following the law of the state it happened would make sense, as would getting rid of death penalty altogether and rejoin the list of civilized nations?

abq e streeter

(7,658 posts)
7. If he's convicted, that's too good for him.Let him rot for decades staring at the walls of his cell.
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 08:33 PM
Jan 2014

Besides my belief that the state has no right to kill.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
16. Amazing how the keyboard commandos turn into right wing revenge baiters
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 06:27 AM
Jan 2014

On this site How progressive !!

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
18. You dont have to be "right wing" to support the death penalty. Read the # of supportive posts.
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 08:40 AM
Jan 2014

PLENTY of DUers back the DP. ANd the majority of the country. The law just needs to be changed so we dont have to worry about convicting an innocent And prosecutors who got illegal convictions in the past need to go to JAIL.
Seems odd that a progressive site would insist on rigid compliance by all on all issues. Besides, I said let "the system" deal with him, much like it does with pedophiles. Hardly makes me a commando. If that were the case I'd be boasting how I'd take him out myself.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
20. Thanks. And the bell? Thats why I want the laws changed. No more grandstanding DAs.
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 09:09 AM
Jan 2014

If you look back at the cases where people have been released, almost all involve prosecutorial misconduct and a LOT of it is intentional. Withholding evidence or fabricating evidence is the worst. Which is why I believe any DAs caught doing this should be disbarred and put in jail. There ARE cases where there is no doubt as to the guilt. The first one that comes to my mind and also
the most frustrating case is the Atlanta courthouse shooter. There was NO DOUBT he was guilty, yet he got a handful of big name lawyers and spent millions on his defense. And this was the initial case, not appeals. Took THREE YEARS to come to trial. It bankrupted the county indigent budget. I still dont know how it was allowed, but it was. If you're not from the area and unfamiliar with it, look it up, it was ridiculous how long and how expensive this case was for a case where it was impossible for anyone else to be guilty. And he got life!

snot

(10,524 posts)
15. A disappointingly lot of rush to judgment here.
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 03:09 AM
Jan 2014

Let's at least not kill him, in case we can learn something from him.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
21. I don't want to kill him.
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 11:52 AM
Jan 2014

Horrible as the crimes he is accused of, I don't want his blood on my hands. Not even a fractional percentage of it, as a member of a society that kills people in the name of justice.

 

soundsgreat

(125 posts)
17. "the government might have a completely erroneous story"
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 08:24 AM
Jan 2014

“The government has taken the position that, ‘Look, we know what we have and you don’t need to know about it,’ ” attorney Judy Clarke told U.S. District Court Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. “It’s of concern that the government thinks it can make a decision based on what they know without some defense input. They may have a completely erroneous story.”

It's amazing how many hate speakers emerge on this "progressive" forum here.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Death penalty decision lo...