Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,062 posts)
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:38 PM Feb 2014

Study: Abortion rate at lowest point since 1973

Source: Washington Post

The abortion rate in the United States dropped to its lowest point since the Supreme Court legalized the procedure in all 50 states, according to a study suggesting that new, long-acting contraceptive methods are having a significant impact in reducing unwanted pregnancies.

There were fewer than 17 abortions for every 1,000 women in 2011, the latest year for which figures were available, according a paper published Monday from the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion-rights think tank. That is down 13 percent from 2008 and a little higher than the rate in 1973, when the Supreme Court handed down its landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

The study did not examine the reasons for the drop. But the authors suggested that one factor was greater reliance on new kinds of birth control, including intra-uterine devices such as Mirena, which can last for years and are not susceptible to user error like daily pills or condoms.

They also noted the economy as a contributing factor, because people tend to adhere more strictly to their birth control during tough economic times. But they did not credit the recent wave of state laws restricting access to abortion, because most of those took effect in 2011 or later.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/study-abortion-rate-at-lowest-point-since-1973/2014/02/02/8dea007c-8a9b-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html



http://www.guttmacher.org/

And seriously, "pro-abortion"? Why is the Post using right wing terminology here? This isn't the Washington Times fergawdsake!
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
5. No. Availability of effective contraception reduces the need for abortion.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:39 PM
Feb 2014

And the RW is working very hard to end contraception access along with abortion access. They want women who enjoy sex to be punished with unwanted motherhood.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
3. Easiest way to not get an abortion - don't get pregnant
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:09 PM
Feb 2014

And access to affordable birth control is a major giant step in that direction (and step #2 is the education to know how to properly use it!)

mathematic

(1,440 posts)
4. pro-"abortion rights", not pro-abortion
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 06:32 PM
Feb 2014

Pro-abortion-rights is the best and most neutral way to describe people that favor unencumbered access to abortion.

Also, there's nothing inherently rw about "pro-abortion". I'm pro-abortion. I'm sure many other people on DU are as well. Being pro-abortion-rights but not being pro-abortion is the common position among Catholic Dems, and other religious Dems. They're not particularly in favor of abortion but they believe it's a private decision, etc etc.

Stargleamer

(1,990 posts)
8. I hope that this doesn't mean. . .
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 12:16 AM
Feb 2014

that the diminishing availability of abortion services in this country is forcing those who would otherwise get an abortion to carry an unwanted child to term. I hope this isn't playing any role.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Study: Abortion rate at l...