CVS to become first major U.S. drugstore to drop cigarettes
Last edited Wed Feb 5, 2014, 10:49 AM - Edit history (3)
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - CVS Caremark Corp said on Wednesday that it would stop selling tobacco products at its 7,600 stores by October, becoming the first U.S. drugstore chain to take cigarettes off the shelf. Public health experts called the decision by the No. 2 U.S. drugstore chain a precedent-setting step that could pressure other stores to follow suit.
CVS, whose Caremark unit is a major pharmacy benefits manager for corporations and the government Medicare program, believes the decision will strengthen its position as a healthcare provider. "I think it will put pressure on other retailers who want to be in healthcare," said CVS Caremark Chief Medical Officer Dr. Troyen Brennan.
Although some U.S. cities, including Boston and San Francisco, already ban the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies, advocates hope CVS' voluntary decision will have a ripple effect among other pharmacy chains. Some retailers stopped selling cigarettes years ago: Target Corp decided to drop them in 1996, while East Coast supermarket chain Wegmans Food Markets did so in 2008.
Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, which advocates for tobacco control, said that CVS's announcement could drive momentum for declining tobacco use. Dr. Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, chief executive officer of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which focuses on public health, called CVS' decision "a bold, precedent-setting move because it acknowledges that pharmacies have become healthcare settings."
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/05/us-cvscaremark-cigarettes-idUSBREA140RP20140205
The end is nigh for public smoking.
An American Heart Association expert on MSNBC was just asked if sugar should be banned at CVS, because of its harmful effects. She responded that cigarettes are different because 'smoking works as designed, to kill you.'
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I believe it's well past time for companies who purport to be interested in their customers health to get out of the cigarette business.
musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)Big corporate chains that is. I have zero doubts. Watch !
meti57b
(3,584 posts)AllyCat
(16,186 posts)They stand in front of a wall of cigarettes
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)because they are cheaper. I hope Walgreens does not follow suit.
sweetloukillbot
(11,011 posts)The company was transitioning from the strip mall stores to the standalone ones, and whenever they were building new stores they weren't including liquor departments because they felt it didn't go along with the pharmacy's health focus. IIRC, it was a major point at a shareholder's meeting around 1993 or 94. There was serious talk about removing cigarettes also. Ultimately it didn't happen, although the vast majority of the stores built (at least in Phoenix) did not have liquor departments after about 1995. Of course they're bringing liquor back into most of them nowadays so there must have been a change of attitude.
LionsTigersRedWings
(108 posts)yellowwoodII
(616 posts)Thank you, CVS! I am pulling my (one) prescription from Walgreens to CVS in a show of solidarity!
underpants
(182,793 posts)I was just about to post this
durablend
(7,460 posts)"DAMN YOU OBAMACARE!!!! YOU SUCK CVS!!!! I'M TAKING MY BUSINESS ELSEWHERE!!!! EXPECT BILLIONS OF US TO DO THE SAME!!!! YOU'LL REGRET IT!!!!"
tridim
(45,358 posts)Mosby
(16,306 posts)PennyK
(2,302 posts)I quit (moved to e-cigs) just in time!
mac56
(17,566 posts)As someone once pointed out, at a drugstore it's weird how you need to walk all the way to the back to get a prescription, but you can buy cigarettes right by the door.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I think that is a big deal. I never thought stores or pharmacies would ever stop selling cigarettes.
RobinA
(9,888 posts)they sold cigarettes, and I smoke!
erpowers
(9,350 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)CVS and Walgreens had a building contest in Oklahoma City over the last 10 years. A lot of our major intersections have a CVS on one corner and a Walgreens on the other so it is usually a coin toss on those incredibly rare occasions I have to shop these types of stores.
Nika
(546 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Step one, get rid of the death sticks, step two, .........
father founding
(619 posts)Expect to see more smoking in movies and tv now.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)Examples: American Hustle and the new series on BBC: Fleming: The Man Who Would Be Bond.
truthisfreedom
(23,146 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)to those "Coffin Nails" I say bravo to CVS. Hell, I remember those GI Posters with a cig dangling out of the corner of a weary soldier's mouth, and the sample packs the tobacco companies used to pass out on campus, and how every movie you went to back when had the hero smoking like a Pittsburgh Steel factory chimney.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)It is amazing to look at a 1957 movie and NOT see a single cigarette. Lon Chaney Sr died of Lung Cancer in 1931. He was a chain smoker.
James Cagney in "A man with a Thousand faces":
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0050681/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_9
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)He had a stroke when he was only 43 and survived, but ended up dying of a stroke at the age of 55. Never quit.
durablend
(7,460 posts)"My choice to smoke is being taken away from me...freedom of speech....evil Obama....first my cigarettes then my guns...blah blah blah". Just check their FB page
(oh and as I said above "You'll be going out of business SOON when we BOYCOTT!!!"...ayup someone said it)
frylock
(34,825 posts)of course they're going to get their fee-fees all hurt with their perpetual persecution complex.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)and my fee-fees are not hurt. There are plenty of other places to buy them.
frylock
(34,825 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)A drain on the health care system, I'm paying (as are you, even more so) for the black lung and mouth cancers. Tax the hell out of tobacco to pay for these future patients, people who can't understand what they are doing.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)I, for one, would rather hang out with idiots than self-righteous jerks.
frylock
(34,825 posts)if you're not calling for a boycott of CVS for taking your gawd given right to purchase cigs away then we're good here.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)that CVS is serious not just about making profits but about promoting healthy living.
Good for CVS.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Rabble rabble rabble, smokers rights, oppression, tyranny.
This is great news.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)Oh yeah.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)along with doctors, that all those things, IN MODERATION, aren't harmful, and in some cases can actually be helpful(small amounts of alcohol). The same cannot be said of cigarettes and tobacco use.
As far as the animal tested cosmetics, no clue, as I don't know what there stance is on that, nor what manufacturers still do animal testing on cosmetics.
TygrBright
(20,759 posts)I don't believe in prohibition or criminalization of self-harming substances.
But I DO believe in control, and the use of access restrictions, education, and prevention programs to help people not use them.
You see a fifteen-year-old hangin' out at the Walgreens? Could be doing anything, no problem.
You see a fifteen-year-old hangin' out at the Smoke Shop? Check it out. Move them on.
Let's get all tobacco/nicotine products out of general sale outlets and into smoke shops. Many benefits to everyone except the poor unfortunate addicts exercising their Constitutional rights to harm themselves.
happily,
Bright
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)After having quit for years, I've chosen to take up a pipe again, not because I'm addicted to tobacco (I don't have an addictive nature at all about anything, drugs, tobacco, alcohol, food or anything else, and I hadn't smoked in a long time) but because I love smoking a pipe and I missed that relaxing pleasure. My father suffered and died from lung cancer so I know what I'm exposing myself to. But this move by CVS doesn't bother me, as long as I can find sources for good smoking tobacco elsewhere. It's my choice to prefer dying younger but enjoying this aspect of life while I live. Longevity to me is not nearly as important for it's own sake as how I choose to enjoy the time I have on this Earth.
Mosby
(16,306 posts)But I think there is more here than a company making a business decision based on community concerns.
I suspect that CVS isn't selling as much tobacco products than in the past, with reduced sales over time, then including the cost of theft, time consuming inventory processes and the rise of "smoke shops" it wasn't worth the effort anymore.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Damn. I don't think I've ever bought cigarettes there, but now by October I can't.
"There" taking away my freedumbs. First are national anthem, now are cigarettes.
durablend
(7,460 posts)Because CLEARLY this is the first step towards it!!!!!
bitchkitty
(7,349 posts)Blue Owl
(50,356 posts)"...ain't got no cigarettes..."
Cha
(297,196 posts)make a lot of money selling cigs? I know they cost a lot and people are addicted so I figured it might be a good profit margin?
Thanks CVS!
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I hope some of the other chains follow their lead.
nilesobek
(1,423 posts)I feel like a purveyor of death on a daily basis. Lots of people like to chew tobacco around here, they come with obvious defects in their faces from chewing it and they still buy it.
I have a bit of an existential crisis selling all this booze and tobacco. The only way I can get through it is to drink after work.
I totally support CVS for this, only if it were my company, I'd be out of a job, a job I struggled mightily to get and hold, even working for six weeks straight while sick as a dog, having perfect attendance.
They make a huge profit off cigarettes, so you know this was a moral decision.