Fired red-light camera executive: Company bribed officials in 13 states, including NJ
Source: Star Ledger
A fired executive from one of New Jerseys red-light camera vendors contends in a lawsuit filed in Arizona that the company provided lavish gifts and bribes to government officials in 13 states including New Jersey to secure new contracts.
The brief but bombshell reference to New Jersey and other states in a 13-page counterclaim was made by Aaron Rosenberg, former nationwide lead salesman for Redflex Traffic Systems of Phoenix. He did not mention specific municipalities from any of the states.
Rosenberg noted in the suit that Redflex bestowed gifts and bribes on ... officials in dozens of municipalities within, but not limited to the following states: California, Washington, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Colorado, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Florida, New Jersey, Tennessee, Virginia, and Georgia.
He said Redflex bribed local officials with meals, golf outings and tickets to professional football and baseball games. The expenses were listed as categories such as entertainment and celebratory tokens, according to the suit.
Read more: http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2014/02/fired_red-light_camera_executive_company_bribed_officials_in_13_states_including_nj.html#incart_m-rpt-1
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)All are on my commute.
When Texas passed legislation against red light cameras, they allowed current contracts to remain in place, so before the legislation took effect they renewed long term contracts with this company. I'm pretty sure someone got a payday over the deal. Fortunately the violations are unenforceable so a lot of people are just throwing them in the trash.
jsr
(7,712 posts)The effort to collect the fines has been thwarted on two fronts: Texas legislators, in awarding cities the ability to set up red-light cameras, did not give them much authority to make offenders pay. For their part, Austin officials, while taking some steps to collect the money, also don't do all they could to make sure the fines are paid.
The result is that unlike most traffic tickets, which can lead to the arrest of a non-paying offender, violators face little consequence aside from repeated letters and phone calls from a private collection business hired by the city. Under state law, major credit agencies are never alerted to violators' lack of payment, so a delinquent's credit score does not suffer.
Even drivers who don't pay parking tickets on expired meters face harsher punishment than red-light scofflaws. They frequently have their cars booted or towed, and collection rates for those fines are significantly higher.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)However, my county has specifically said they will refuse to do this. I've never gotten a violation, but if I ever do I'm not going to pay it.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)A list of places where the officials were bribed would certainly be nice.
George II
(67,782 posts)former9thward
(32,003 posts)Everyone of those other things are typical business expenses when people are negotiating contracts.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Here's the bribery statute which lists "any benefit as consideration for the recipient's decision"
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.36.htm
I don't know about other states.
It might be a business expense for federal tax purposes, but that's not going to help you with a state charge of bribery. I hope this filters down to the local level here. I have a feeling some of the present and past city council members are shitting their pants about right now.
former9thward
(32,003 posts)Beyond a reasonable doubt. Sitting down at a lunch or going golfing while discussing business is not illegal.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Some states have ethics rules which limit what a public official can accept. In those cases it's not to hard to finger the public officials themselves and it just depends on whether they want to deal for the person making the bribe or the person accepting it. Personally I hope they go after the people that accepted them. There's one current and one former city council members here locally that wouldn't surprise me at all if they were in on the deal. One council member was voted out already over the red light camera deal and the other one didn't have any opposition during the last election, so we have to wait for the next one.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)Even if they are not, I don't see this not having an influence over voters.
former9thward
(32,003 posts)debunkthis
(99 posts)( referring to the cameras, of course, not the people )
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Are done so wrongly. I wonder if statistic are kept on the impact of installing these devices. I suspect they may increase rear end accidents because their shortened yellow light could cause more hard braking and rear end collisions.