Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jsr

(7,712 posts)
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:34 PM Feb 2014

Supreme Court sides with military in Vandenberg protest case

Source: Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court in a unanimous decision ruled Wednesday that military commanders have broad power to keep protesters off of bases, including the public roads that pass through them.

The decision upholds the prosecution of a veteran peace activist from Santa Barbara who repeatedly returned to protest on a highway outside Vandenberg Air Force Base, even after he had been ordered to stay away.

John Dennis Apel had been barred from Vandenberg in 2003 after he threw blood on a base sign. But he returned repeatedly in the years after to protest inside a designated protest zone along Highway 1.

Officers warned him he was violating the order to stay away, and in 2010, he was escorted away and prosecuted for violating the order. A magistrate convicted him and ordered him to pay $355 in fines and fees.





Read more: http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-supreme-court-military-protester-20140226,0,1016278.story

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court sides with military in Vandenberg protest case (Original Post) jsr Feb 2014 OP
Hard to say which is worse – mahannah Feb 2014 #1
note that the 1st amendment argument was NOT considered in this decision. geek tragedy Feb 2014 #2
Freedumb. GeorgeGist Feb 2014 #3
Here is the actual Court Opinion happyslug Feb 2014 #4

mahannah

(893 posts)
1. Hard to say which is worse –
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:54 PM
Feb 2014

the military ordering protesters to stay away or the court unanimously siding with that call.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. note that the 1st amendment argument was NOT considered in this decision.
Wed Feb 26, 2014, 12:57 PM
Feb 2014
He noted that because the high court had not dealt with the 1st Amendment issue in the case, Apel was free to raise that point in a further appeal to the 9th Circuit.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court sides with ...