Anchor Resigns On Air Over Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine (Update)
Source: Huffington Post
"Personally I cannot be part of a network funded by the Russian government that whitewashes the actions of Putin," Wahl, a Washington, D.C.-based correspondent for Russia Today, said. "I'm proud to be an American and believe in disseminating the truth and that is why after this newscast I'm resigning."
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/05/russia-anchor-resigns-ukraine-invasion_n_4907140.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013&ir=Politics
Boy, that CIA does get around don't they?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Ex-RT Anchor Liz Wahl: RT Not About the Truth, Its About Promoting a Putinist Agenda
Ex-RT anchor Liz Wahl made her first post-resignation TV appearance with Anderson Cooper Wednesday night, telling him that in the midst of the current Ukranian crisis, the propagandist nature of RT came out in full force and she couldnt bring herself to work there anymore. She cited specific examples of biased news coverage, including a package about Neo-Nazis in the opposition. Wahl said to portray the entire operation as being part of this right-wing extremist group is going along with the narrative that Vladimir Putin wants to go along with.
She told Cooper there are lots of young people working at RT eager to please management and theres a form of self-censorship that you learn in order to present the Putin perspective. She said, RT is not about the truth, its about promoting a Putinist agenda.
She dismissed RTs statement that she resigned for attention, explaining she hesitated in the first place because of fear of repercussion, but found it comforting to hear positive feedback on social media. Wahl told The Daily Beast earlier today that the true agenda of RTs propaganda is making America look bad.
-snip-
Full post with VIDEO here: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ex-rt-anchor-to-cooper-rt-%E2%80%98not-about-the-truth-it%E2%80%99s-about-promoting-a-putinist-agenda%E2%80%99/
agent46
(1,262 posts)My best hope is that this starts a national conversation about the biased nature of American news media and the money behind the use of propaganda here in the US.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Criticism is fairly limited to Fox news and a few other personalities whose blatant, over the top Reich wing pov's along with their korporate masters get a lot of attention.
But that's just about the extent of it.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)...seem to think the US invaded Crimea. RT's amateurish by comparison.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Putin has not "invaded" Ukraine .... his troops were already there
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)were seized by a native pro-Russian group.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)As opposed to re-purposed individuals from the base.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)so until known, it is not an invasion.
We have local militia in places like Idaho which might do the same thing if their ethnicity ends up not being represented in Washington some day.
pampango
(24,692 posts)all over Crimea are not Russian soldiers. Those who want to believe him are not confronted with the visible proof that insignia would provide."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024611875
Are the sailors aboard the Russian navy ships also members of a "native pro-Russian group"? Those Russian ships are blockading Ukrainian navy ships so that they cannot move. If "native pro-Russian groups" have taken over or been given control of Russian navy ships that would be a big deal.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Or diverts us from focusing on it.
Quick: How many US troops died last month? How many drone kills last year? Why did very smart people allow Bushco to get away with telling us we might even turn a modest profit on the Iraq War, because of Iraq's oil, and the Iraqis would hang flowers around the necks of our invading military?