Judge strikes down Michigan ban on gay marriage as unconstitutional
Source: Detroit Free Press
In a historic ruling that provided a huge morale boost to the gay-rights movement, U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman today struck down Michigans ban on same-sex marriage, making it the 18th state in the nation to allow gays and lesbians to join in matrimony, just like their heterosexual counterparts.
The state has long argued that it is, and that the will of 2.7 million voters who in 2004 decided that marriage is only to be between a man and a woman should not be drowned out by a single judge. The state also argues that it has a legitimate interest in preserving the traditional family structure because it claims children thrive best when raised by married moms and dads.
Friedman, though, sided with the plaintiffs: two Hazel Park lesbian nurses who argue the state has no rational basis for denying them the right to get married and adopt each others children.
The plaintiffs, April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse, are raising three special needs children together and want to get married. The also want to adopt each others children, but cant because Michigan doesnt allow same-sex couple adoptions. Rowse has two preschool-age boys; DeBoer has a 3-year-old daughter.
Read more: http://www.freep.com/article/20140321/NEWS06/303210121/Judge-strikes-down-Michigan-ban-gay-marriage-unconstitutional
Love it. Arc, moral universe, etc...
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Teabagger heads are popping all over this state.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States#States_that_license_same-sex_marriage_.28table.29
Good to hear that Michigan will soon be on the list too
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)The right case has to wind it's way through the federal appellate process but eventually this issue, whether or not the federal or a state government or other sub-jurisdiction may deny a same-gender couple to obtain a government license to marry on the same basis as an opposite-gender couple and be accorded the same rights and obligations.
Too many district judges and even Circuits are chiming in on this. I believe the 10th Circuit in Denver is the next one to consider the Utah and Oklahoma? cases? I was surprised but not shocked that a group of Republican politicians from my home state of Wyoming have written an amicus brief in the Utah case urging to Court to find on the side of those wishing to marry.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Faygo Kid
(21,478 posts)Once a Michigander, always a Michigander, I guess. Very glad to hear this; I saw no other outcome given how weak the state's case was.
Good for Judge Friedman.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)could begin as soon as Monday but...
Michigan Attorney General Schutte has filed an emergency appeal to block this decision.
Stay tuned...
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette filed an emergency request for stay of Friedmans ruling.
In 2004 the citizens of Michigan recognized that diversity in parenting is best for kids and families because moms and dads are not interchangeable. Michigan voters enshrined that decision in our State constitution, and their will should stand and be respected. I will continue to carry out my duty to protect and defend the Constitution, said Schuette.
According to Schuette, Friedman did not follow the trend sent by other federal judges handling similar cases across the country, Judge Friedman did not stay his ruling pending the outcome of appeal.
http://www.freep.com/article/20140321/NEWS06/303210121/Michigan-gay-marriage-ruling
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Here's the link to another article for Q & A:
http://www.freep.com/article/20140321/NEWS06/303210126/gay-marriage-Q-A
So at least three counties will open their offices for marriage licenses. Washtenaw is only going to issues 60, no word on the other two. My guess is those will go quick. The article says they have to wait three days (Tuesday). I wonder about the rest of the counties. It may be a race against the clock not only to get a license, but also to get married before a possible stay is put into place. While the ruling was not automatically stayed, who knows what could happen next week.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Federal Judge Denies Tennessees Request To Halt Recognition Of Same-Sex Couples Marriages
Here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024705258
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)GreenEyedLefty
(2,073 posts)We are so ass-backward on so many issues... but this is a great day!
I was NOT one of the 2.7 million who voted for the amendment back in 2004.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)K and R
Siwsan
(26,262 posts)Wow!
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)The key issue in this case was whether same sex couples would be good parents compared to straight couples. The judge rejected the experts offered by the state of Michigan http://www.scribd.com/doc/213770186/2-12-cv-10285-151-Michigan-Decision
The Court was unable to accord the testimony of Marks, Price, and Allen any significant weight. Markss testimony is largely unbelievable. He characterized the overwhelming consensus among sociologists and psychologists who endorse the no differences viewpoint asgroup think, by which he said he meant a politically correct viewpoint that the majority has accepted without subjecting it to proper scientific scrutiny. Marks undertook an excruciatingly detailed examination of the 59 published studies cited by the APA in support of its 2005 Brief on Lesbian and Gay Parenting, in which it concluded that [n]ot a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents. Marks, as well as Price and Allen, faulted many of these studies for their small sample sizes, the non-random methods used to obtain subjects, and the fact that some lacked heterosexual comparison groups, among other criticisms. Marks, Price and Allen all failed to concede the importance of convenience sampling as a social science research tool. They, along with Regnerus, clearly represent a fringe viewpoint that is rejected by the vast majority of their colleagues across a variety of social science fields. The most that can be said of these witnesses testimony is that the no differences consensus has not been proven with scientific certainty, not that there is any credible evidence showing that children raised by same-sex couples fare worse than those raised by heterosexual couples.
This is a great ruling on the issue of whether children are hurt or injured due being raised by same sex couples. The Court did some great findings of fact here that will make this case an important case on this issue.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)-snip-
Attorney General Bill Schuette said he would immediately ask a federal appeals court to freeze Friedman's decision and prevent same-sex couples from marrying while he appeals the case.
-snip-
Full AP article here: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GAY_MARRIAGE_MICHIGAN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-03-21-17-43-43
llmart
(15,539 posts)it was followed up by the news about Schuette. I hope that asshat gets shot down. These backwards Repukes will never get it that the tide is turning and their bigoted ways are not the wave of the future. He can take Snyder with him.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)lancer78
(1,495 posts)"Taking the state defendants position ( That SSM should be banned because it is a sub-optimal child rearing environment) to its logical conclusion, the empirical
evidence at hand should require that only rich, educated, suburban-dwelling, married Asians may
marry, to the exclusion of all other heterosexual couples."
JudyM
(29,241 posts)Why Asians, though?
according to empirical evidence, kids in Asian households do the best.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)fujiyama
(15,185 posts)I'm glad to see these stupid gay marriage bans falling apart, state by state. It was only ten years ago it passed, but it feels like a lifetime ago.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The same year Oregon approved Measure 36. Hopefully both Oregon and Michigan reverse course this year.
maryellen99
(3,789 posts)To get the religious right/bush voters to the polls?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The only other one besides Michigan (mentioned in the article) is Oregon, which is my home state. I remember because I voted and am overseas. Late in the day Wednesday (here) I went to look at the results and was shocked it had passed. It didn't make a difference in the presidential election in Oregon (or in Michigan). Maybe it did in some other states.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)catbyte
(34,386 posts)couples waiting in line, watching others ahead of them getting married, only to be turned away. Michigan AG Bill Scheutte is a flaming bagger asshole.