Breaking: Judge Dismiss "Haas v Romney" Case Against Defendants Gold & MNAT

[laserhaas]

Source: Federal District Court Los Angeles Docket Item 66

IN CHAMBERS ORDER: (1) GRANTING Defendant Barry Gold’s Motion to Dismiss [18]; (2) GRANTING Defendants Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel LLP and Gregory W. Werkheiser’s Motion to Dismiss [20]; and (3) CONTINUING Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend [26]

The allegations of the proposed Second Amended Complaint do not cure this jurisdictional defect. The gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint against Gold and the MNAT Defendants is that they abused their authority in their roles as appointees of the Bankruptcy Court. (See, e.g., Dkt 26: Proposed SAC ¶¶ 114, 117, 348-350, 449-450.) For this reason, the claims against defendants Gold, Werkheiser, and Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel LLP are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Read more: http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_di_66_apr9_2014_order_to_dismiss_via_barton_doctrine.pdf

---

In fighting Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney, the courts have (for more than a decade now) ruled contrary to the Constitution and allowed the White Collar fraudsters to receive nothing more than a slap on the wrist.

This court obviously wants nothing to do with the case; and is tossing it out the easiest way possible. Hope the justice is retiring - before the higher courts toss the case back at him. Dismissals "with prejudice" can NOT happen - without adjudication upon the merits. Even the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) states openly that the ruling from 1881 "Barton doctrine" doesn't apply when misconduct is involved.

Please see the linked item below that says {at the very end} the following;.

http://www.abiworld.org/committees/newsletters/litigation/vol2num2/Gatekeeper.html

However, in the unlikely event of misconduct, this rule will not act as a shield. In addition to adverse consequences in the nonappointing court, the offending party may find it difficult to obtain bankruptcy court approval for fees incurred or future appointments.

[laserhaas]

1. They have to make up some other excuse to toss case out on Romney, Bain and Glazer

But I'm prepared for this (have always known it would likely come).

Romney and I have a hearing on June 2, 2014;
but (I expect) that will be cancelled also.

Not legal - what is going on

Just money and power, might makes right.

[aggiesal]

2. Another case of Affluenza. n/t

[laserhaas]

3. Concur

But the inflexible sword of truth is immortal

And this victim isnt going anywhere

[laserhaas]

4. It is a shame that one has to beg, relentlessly, for the U.S. Gov to arrest organized crimes

instead of the U.S. Gov begging me to get out of their way to do the job of halting organized (RICO) crimes.

[laserhaas]

5. Liberals Unite Ann Werner wrote an update story on the case

See it here - at Samuel Warde's link

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024803332

[laserhaas]

6. Isn't neat how they keep making proof of their crimes - VANISH (the Gatekeeper link)

Just par for the course of tyranny, cronyism and corruption...


http://www.abiworld.org/committees/newsletters/litigation/vol2num2/Gatekeeper.html