Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 12:53 PM Apr 2014

CBO Lowers Obamacare's Price Tag By $104 Billion Over 10 Years

Source: TPM

DYLAN SCOTT – APRIL 14, 2014, 12:41 PM EDT

In its latest projections for Obamacare, the Congressional Budget Office has lowered the law's costs over the next 10 years by more than $100 billion.

Most of the change can be linked to lower spending on tax subsidies for coverage purchased on HealthCare.gov and its state counterparts, which can in turn be linked to lower-than-expected premiums.

CBO projected that the federal government would spend $164 billion less than previously expected on Obamacare subsidies by 2024. It appears that a number of factors contributed to that change. Premiums, especially in the near term, are expected to be lower than previously projected: The office estimated premiums would rise on average by about $100 in 2015. They are still expected to rise over the next decade, but at a lower rate than previously thought.

It's a combination of rising medical costs, a healthier enrollment population in 2015 and the make-up of the Obamacare plans, which have narrower provider networks and lower provider payments than their counterparts in the large-group market, that contribute to the CBO's calculations on premiums. Other changes, such as a smaller under-65 population, also factored into the downward revisions on subsidies.

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/cbo-obamacare-april-2014

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CBO Lowers Obamacare's Price Tag By $104 Billion Over 10 Years (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2014 OP
How do opponents run against it now? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #1
By shouting louder. DavidDvorkin Apr 2014 #2
No, by turning it 180 degrees and put it on FOX for the brain dead . Obama care rises 100B over 10 geretogo Apr 2014 #3
You mean something like this? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #4
Please, please tell me that's Photoshop NickB79 Apr 2014 #5
It probably is, but there's one around here that's the genuine article. Somehow, Fox News made.... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #6
This is the math that is taught in Republican privatized schools . geretogo Apr 2014 #8
Oh, their claim is that the 7mill aren't paying. Thus, Amurika is going broke! Buy guns and ammo! nt freshwest Apr 2014 #12
I know. They'd be in hog heaven if the Feds shot one of these freaking gun nuts. I actually heard Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #15
And all of it funded by the Koches. They've got all sides of the political spectrum conned. Did you freshwest Apr 2014 #16
It's kinda frightening when you consider how immense wealth can be used to help & harm. Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #17
this is one of those articles melm00se Apr 2014 #7
Yet this expensive program lowers the deficit....the savings outweigh the costs. Fred Sanders Apr 2014 #10
Not as expensive as 7.2 million people stiffing the ER. Blue State Bandit Apr 2014 #11
It keeps getting better liberal N proud Apr 2014 #9
No, no, the RWJNs say it's TEOTWAWKI!!11!! freshwest Apr 2014 #14
Recommend. Jefferson23 Apr 2014 #13
Does the law require providers to accept customers OneCrazyDiamond Apr 2014 #18

geretogo

(1,281 posts)
3. No, by turning it 180 degrees and put it on FOX for the brain dead . Obama care rises 100B over 10
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 01:37 PM
Apr 2014

years .

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)
6. It probably is, but there's one around here that's the genuine article. Somehow, Fox News made....
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 02:29 PM
Apr 2014

6 million, one third of 7 million. It's the new math.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
12. Oh, their claim is that the 7mill aren't paying. Thus, Amurika is going broke! Buy guns and ammo! nt
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 05:50 PM
Apr 2014

Tarheel_Dem

(31,233 posts)
15. I know. They'd be in hog heaven if the Feds shot one of these freaking gun nuts. I actually heard
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 06:36 PM
Apr 2014

a Sheriff (Oathkeeper), on Randi's show, saying they'd put women on the front lines, and watch the Feds gun them down, so they could flash those images around the world. They're insurrectionists, and they're playing a very dangerous game right now. These are the kinds of folk who have martyred Edward Snowden.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
16. And all of it funded by the Koches. They've got all sides of the political spectrum conned. Did you
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 11:13 PM
Apr 2014

the threads on the Koches in all of these groups?

This one is funded by them.







melm00se

(4,991 posts)
7. this is one of those articles
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 02:36 PM
Apr 2014

that fishes people (on both sides of the issue).

Lower costs:
$100 billion over 10 years = $10 Billion/year.

Overall costs
Pre this report
~$1.5 trillion over 10 years = ~$150 Billion (average - it's actually a curve)

Post this report
~$1.35 trillion over 10 years = ~$135 billion (average - it's actually a curve)

Important program but an expensive one.


Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
11. Not as expensive as 7.2 million people stiffing the ER.
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 05:45 PM
Apr 2014

Come to think of it... I think that pays for the UC benefits extension. Just what the House Repugicants were demanding in exchange for passage.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
14. No, no, the RWJNs say it's TEOTWAWKI!!11!!
Mon Apr 14, 2014, 05:59 PM
Apr 2014
They need to turn of the TV and cut down on the coffee. Or whatever they're doing.

Like this guy:



Buy more guns and ammo!!!

OneCrazyDiamond

(2,031 posts)
18. Does the law require providers to accept customers
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 04:24 PM
Apr 2014

who have exchange plans?

If not, this could be a back door to denying coverage again.

which have narrower provider networks and lower provider payments than their counterparts in the large-group market


"I am sorry, we reject affordable care in our practice. It doesn't pay enough."
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CBO Lowers Obamacare's Pr...