Microsoft warns of Internet Explorer security gap
Source: AP-Excite
REDMOND, Wash. (AP) Microsoft says a security gap in Internet Explorer could allow an attacker to take complete control of a computer if the user clicks on a malicious link.
The vulnerability affects versions 6 through 11 of the Web browser.
Microsoft Corp. said Saturday that it was aware of "limited, targeted attacks" that tried to exploit the security gap. The company is working on a fix which it plans to provide in a software update on May 13.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140428/us-microsoft-security-gap-843a2c1e30.html
Online:
Microsoft Security Advisory: http://bit.ly/1fJX5RR
aggiesal
(8,914 posts)gtar100
(4,192 posts)Probably has more to do with how controllable they are over a domain. But I just shake my head every time I hear that reasoning.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)like Flash. So I have to use Exploder whenever I run across Flash, because I can't install the stupid plug-in for Firefox.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Indeed, this is the most common reaction.
However, I estimate about 90% of AmericaOnline subscribers still use MS IE.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)So much for your conspiracy theory.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)amerikat
(4,909 posts)I have no choice in the matter. Hadn't used IE in years until this job came along. I even had
use it on my home computers until I got the work laptop. Trying to get everything moved to the work laptop
then I won't have to use it on my home computers. Hope they don't get hacked in the mean time.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)amerikat
(4,909 posts)So I can't install shit. Working on getting admin or power user rights. It's a slow
process. I know ways to get around this problem but It's against policy to do so. And I'm a new hire.
Never had a computer that I didn't have admin rights. Frustrating.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)bhikkhu
(10,715 posts)It amazes me nowadays when I find someone that still uses it
Angleae
(4,482 posts)Boeing's maintenance manuals are delivered by web site that is IE only as such I have to use IE at work.
doxydad
(1,363 posts)is when you help older folks to keep their computers up to snuff, and they do not understand why you would like them to go use a different browser. That's OLD school, but once a certain daily pattern is established, good luck re-teaching those folks. Believe me, it's no fun.
I got my first computer in the '90's. There wasn't a big selection of browsers then and IE came standard. I believe it was the cause of many of my computer "terminal crashes" over the years, but I had become used to it.
After my last breakdown a few months ago, I exclusively use Mozilla-Firefox. Guess what? No continual updates and my computer works better than ever. My neighbor just reformatted my latest computer instead of replacing another one...
I am not tech savvy but i can imagine how much space the constant IE updates were using.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)UpInArms
(51,283 posts)easy easy easy - been using it since 2000 -
www.opera.com
nimble light not a pig
easy to tab browse and safe (or as safe as I can make it)
bhikkhu
(10,715 posts)it works well, and works perfectly with Ubuntu - 10 years with that OS and not a single virus or malware issue.
My kids use Chrome, which is pretty good too, on our "upstairs" computer. That and Firefox are similar enough that I don't really notice a difference, though I think the settings and tool menus are easier to use in Firefox.
progree
(10,907 posts)U.S., UK advise avoiding Internet Explorer until bug fixed, 4/28/14,
... The U.S. and UK governments on Monday advised computer users to consider using alternatives to Microsoft Corp's Internet Explorer browser until the company fixes a security flaw that hackers used to launch attacks....
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)I'm going to have to bother the IT people when I get to work about this one...
alp227
(32,023 posts)Meanwhile, this headline could have easily been written back in the bad old days of malware, like in 2003, '04, '05, etc. Of course because MICROSOFT.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)but this has been in the news for days.
This is the kind of stuff we expect from IE anyway. It is a pos browser.
doxydad
(1,363 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)Opera and Chrome
efhmc
(14,725 posts)Would you care to tell me what you think and why, please? Using firefox now.
d_r
(6,907 posts)but if I did I would use the Iron or Comodo dragon derivatives of chromium rather than chrome, just to get some of the google privacy issues out.
More info-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRWare_Iron
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comodo_Dragon_%28web_browser%29
efhmc
(14,725 posts)starroute
(12,977 posts)I tried Chrome at my kids' urging, but quickly gave up. For one thing, it only allows you to have the tabs at the very top of the screen, above all the menus and the address bar -- which meant that I had to tilt my head back every time I wanted to switch tabs. For another, it doesn't let you adjust the font size separately for each webpage, which meant I was doing a lot of switching back and forth to be able to read each page in a comfortable way.
Firefox can be a bit clunky, but at least I can generally get it to do what I want and not what it wants, and that's what matters to me. (Though at the moment I'm holding off from upgrading to Firefox 29, because they've apparently redone the default theme in ways that break the custom theme I've been happily using for years. That's something I'm not happy about.)
efhmc
(14,725 posts)starroute
(12,977 posts)I've been reading comments this morning, and the general consensus is that they've made it more like Chrome in all the worst ways. For example, here's a Slashdot thread -- http://beta.slashdot.org/story/201357
So I'm not updating, and I may try out SeaMonkey, which is more of Firefox as it used to be -- http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
intaglio
(8,170 posts)from 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 et seq
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Run a linux flavor OS. Install Virtualbox. Then install WinsuxP and run IE inside it.
UpInArms
(51,283 posts)allow me to run adobe products?
hmmmmm
if so, might be able to change all my computers at the office - and that would make me very happy
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)...system that require Active X tools. Can't hurt to try it.
I'm going to set up a "dummy" with that system to see if it will work with my needs
I appreciate the suggestion on which version to use
penultimate
(1,110 posts)You'll get better performance and it will let you create shared folders so that you can easily get your files from the VM on the physical machine.
UpInArms
(51,283 posts)to remember - will be setting it up sometime in June
TheBlackAdder
(28,193 posts)chrisa
(4,524 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)Maybe I can look it up on Lycos or eXcite.
Omaha Steve
(99,630 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 30, 2014, 05:57 AM - Edit history (1)
What is your point? I used to own stock in Excite.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)by Ask Jeeves (now ask.com) and the page was redirected. Perhaps I should have used infoseek.com as an example. That gets directed to go.com (Disney).
Omaha Steve
(99,630 posts)progree
(10,907 posts)I went to microsoft.com and clicked a few links, and found nothing at all about this security breach. There is something if one digs deep, but I expected something on the home page, or on a security or Internet Explorer page one click from the home page -- given that both the U.S. and U.K GOVERNMENTS suggest not using it. And given that this is getting a good deal of media attention.
Anyway, here is what I provided as feedback on one of their IE pages:
By the way, I use Chrome as my principal browser. But sometimes I have to see what one of my website's pages looks like from the perspective of an IE user. And it does save complex HTML files in a more useful format than Chrome, so in the rare occasions when I want to save a web page as a web page, I use IE.
There's a couple of other minor advantages of IE. But a lot of disadvantages which is why Chrome is my primary browser.
Yes, I'm aware of Microsoft's security advisory in the OP - http://bit.ly/1fJX5RR which morphs into https://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/security/2963983 . My point is that one wouldn't find this just by browsing around at microsoft.com unless one knew where to look or specifically searched for it.
pscot
(21,024 posts)Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Proprietary, commercial operating systems cannot respond to security as fast as open source. When they do, one cannot opt out of anything other than a whole update. We'll make you take the fix, plus these other things our partners want you to have. Plus, we'll make you take our leaky browser as well, and make you upgrade your hardware.
Hehehehehe!