Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 08:36 PM Jul 2014

Edward Snowden should not face trial, says UN human rights commissioner

Source: The Guardian

The United Nations's top human rights official has suggested that the United States should abandon its efforts to prosecute Edward Snowden, saying his revelations of massive state surveillance had been in the public interest.

The UN high commissioner for human rights, Navi Pillay, credited Snowden, a former US National Security Agency contractor, with starting a global debate that has led to calls for the curtailing of state powers to snoop on citizens online and store their data.

"Those who disclose human rights violations should be protected: we need them," Pillay told a news conference.

"I see some of it here in the case of Snowden, because his revelations go to the core of what we are saying about the need for transparency, the need for consultation," she said. "We owe a great deal to him for revealing this kind of information."

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/16/edward-snowden-should-not-face-trial-un-human-rights-commissioner-navi-pillay?CMP=twt_gu

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Edward Snowden should not face trial, says UN human rights commissioner (Original Post) Luminous Animal Jul 2014 OP
Thank you, Madame Commisioner, from the bottom of my heart Demeter Jul 2014 #1
So what?? truth2power Jul 2014 #2
Thank you, High Commissioner Pillay. Very important to the world for you ballyhoo Jul 2014 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #4
Nothing new here, people. MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #5
Well... vlakitti Jul 2014 #7
K&R. Glad to hear it. Overseas Jul 2014 #6
Under the definition he is clearly a whistleblower. It is like the "Cleetus the Ammosexual" vid Dustlawyer Jul 2014 #8
How? He revealed legal government activity. Recursion Jul 2014 #10
Slavery was legal in the US. But still? Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #29
Was Harriet Beecher Stowe a "whistleblower"? Recursion Jul 2014 #33
not legal questionseverything Jul 2014 #51
What law does it violate? Recursion Jul 2014 #53
the 4th amendment is still the law of the land questionseverything Jul 2014 #58
k/r 840high Jul 2014 #9
Why shouldn't he have to prove that? treestar Jul 2014 #11
You have it backward. The accused are not required to prove their innocence. totodeinhere Jul 2014 #13
Wish he was here so all of that could happen. George II Jul 2014 #14
why does he need to be here for that to happen? wildbilln864 Jul 2014 #17
+1 NealK Jul 2014 #46
Well he refuses to be prosecuted! treestar Jul 2014 #52
He is not above the law. He was granted temporary asylum in Russia in accordance totodeinhere Jul 2014 #54
The sentiment here is that he should not have to face these charges treestar Jul 2014 #56
Sometimes, imthevicar Jul 2014 #12
Edward Snowden should face trial Zorro Jul 2014 #15
On what charges, Zero? BillZBubb Jul 2014 #19
The charges have been public for over a year now Recursion Jul 2014 #34
He can't get a fair trial under the Espionage Act since he's barred from defending himself riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #36
That's Snowden's own fault for not attempting to use the whistleblower provisions before leaking to stevenleser Jul 2014 #37
Nope. As even the UN commissioner understands, the US didn't need to charge him at all riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #38
Certainly you are not that naive? BillZBubb Jul 2014 #43
I'm sure that he does. NealK Jul 2014 #47
But, but.... Snowden helped the Russians capture Jack Bauer! cascadiance Jul 2014 #39
K&R DeSwiss Jul 2014 #16
That is great! C Moon Jul 2014 #22
If you could just put Nick Nolte's hair on them, DeSwiss. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #28
Anything for you Joe! DeSwiss Jul 2014 #32
Now that's scary and evil, it captures their true essence. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #40
K&R n/t Joe Shlabotnik Jul 2014 #18
Ms. Pillay got it absolutely correct. BillZBubb Jul 2014 #20
Thankfully Ms. Pillay doesn't dictate American law George II Jul 2014 #21
Thankfully, the UN takes human rights as seriously as our founders. Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #24
Well said. NealK Jul 2014 #48
Well, at least now JoeyT Jul 2014 #23
Indeed. Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #25
Yep. Those Black Helicopters are really creepy! NealK Jul 2014 #49
I am glad for the revelations, as is Pillay. merrily Jul 2014 #26
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #27
You are welcome, Uncle Joe. Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #31
But, but... Stryst Jul 2014 #30
DUH! billhicks76 Jul 2014 #35
Though I am no fan of the NSA stuff iandhr Jul 2014 #41
Then he better stay out of US hands FiveGoodMen Jul 2014 #42
He'd better stay right where he is. Because Russia CAN be trusted. randome Jul 2014 #50
Recommend! KoKo Jul 2014 #44
Hell, not only that... woo me with science Jul 2014 #45
OK...And?? Blue_Tires Jul 2014 #55
interesting! BelgianMadCow Jul 2014 #57
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. Thank you, Madame Commisioner, from the bottom of my heart
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 08:41 PM
Jul 2014

I'm sure I speak on behalf of all humans. Those who don't agree probably are mechanical engines of death like Darth Cheney, not human.

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
2. So what??
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:04 PM
Jul 2014

The US is exceptional!! Isn't that what our Great Leader is always telling us?

We don't need no stinkin' human rights official tellin' us what to do. No indeedy.

USA! USA!






 

ballyhoo

(2,060 posts)
3. Thank you, High Commissioner Pillay. Very important to the world for you
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:08 PM
Jul 2014

to be stating that, and also important to me who realizes what Snowden did, virtually postponing our entrance to fascism for at least a brief time. The US will most probably not follow your suggestion either directly or in actuality. Snowden should stay where he is for as long as he can. There should be emerging States that may one day take him.

Response to Luminous Animal (Original post)

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
5. Nothing new here, people.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 09:28 PM
Jul 2014

Pillay mentioned this months ago on some phone calls she made to friends. It's all under control.

And there were a few other things on those calls that... well, let's just say that Ms. Pillay may want to do some favors for us down the line, or certain information could fall into the wrong hands.

Regards,

NSA Manny

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
8. Under the definition he is clearly a whistleblower. It is like the "Cleetus the Ammosexual" vid
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 10:15 PM
Jul 2014

that is on the front page right now. He wants to carry his guns in public sooo bad that he comes up with crazy conspiracies, name calling.... They want the surveillance soooo bad that Snowden cannot be a whistleblower because that would mean that what they are doing is wrong, out of bounds, unconstitutional whatever!

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. How? He revealed legal government activity.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 10:30 PM
Jul 2014

It's legal government activity we wish weren't legal, but still.

Drake was a whistleblower in 2005. Congress (including then-Senator Obama) nearly broke its neck rushing back into session to make what Snowden revealed legal.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
33. Was Harriet Beecher Stowe a "whistleblower"?
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 05:29 AM
Jul 2014


It's why I'm much more sympathetic with Drake than I am with Snowden, at any rate.

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
51. not legal
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 10:43 PM
Jul 2014

60,000 warrants at a time is not legal

nsa spying on citizens and forwarding tips to dea, dea doing a parallel construction, not legal

nsa picking winners and losers in business not legal

nsa reinventing english language by secretly interpreting the patriot act's "relevant to mean everything",not legal

solicitor general has lied to the sc twice over this illegal activity

i am not gonna bother to link up because anyone paying attention should know this is going on.these are just examples off the top of my head

if you and other random individuals do not believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, i guess that is your choice but it is still the law off the land

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
53. What law does it violate?
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 05:27 AM
Jul 2014

The law that Congress (including then-Senator Obama) passed after Drake's leak is pretty clear in its vagueness. What part of what Snowden revealed do you consider illegal?

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
58. the 4th amendment is still the law of the land
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 11:04 AM
Jul 2014

the patriot act/telecommunications act do not over rule it...it would take an amendment to do that

just because we currently have a corrupt supreme court that does not change

"building the haystack", or keeping files on every persons private communications without probable cause is illegal

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
13. You have it backward. The accused are not required to prove their innocence.
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 10:45 PM
Jul 2014

They only have to establish reasonable doubt. It is up to the prosecution to prove guilt.

 

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)
17. why does he need to be here for that to happen?
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 11:46 PM
Jul 2014

they've been trying cases for decades even when the defendant is absent. He would be suicided if he came back.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
52. Well he refuses to be prosecuted!
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 05:14 AM
Jul 2014

Or his supporters claim he should not even have to be in the position where the government even has to try to prove anything! Why the heck is he above the law?

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
54. He is not above the law. He was granted temporary asylum in Russia in accordance
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 09:10 PM
Jul 2014

with international standards regarding such matters. Our country has granted asylum to a lot of people as well.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
56. The sentiment here is that he should not have to face these charges
Sat Jul 19, 2014, 01:13 PM
Jul 2014

And the Russian-given asylum is political, not because he would truly be persecuted and not receive a fair trial.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
34. The charges have been public for over a year now
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 05:33 AM
Jul 2014

The charges are theft, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful disclosure of classified communications to an unauthorized person. The last two are crimes under the 1917 espionage act. They would probably also hit him with misuse of a government computer (that basically hits every government employee, nowadays).

The one where they really have him dead to rights, IMO, is his description of our espionage activities against China to the South China Daily, which SCD alleges included which computers of theirs we had compromised and how.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
37. That's Snowden's own fault for not attempting to use the whistleblower provisions before leaking to
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 10:13 AM
Jul 2014

the press.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
38. Nope. As even the UN commissioner understands, the US didn't need to charge him at all
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 11:08 AM
Jul 2014

The Obama administration has chosen the.most punitive path instead.

Snowden is being lauded by an ever increasing number of people and countries.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
43. Certainly you are not that naive?
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 06:13 PM
Jul 2014

You know what happens to whistleblowers in the national security area, right?

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
39. But, but.... Snowden helped the Russians capture Jack Bauer!
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 11:38 AM
Jul 2014

We need to bring him back for trial on that shouldn't we? After all Audrey's dead because of his treason!

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
16. K&R
Wed Jul 16, 2014, 11:08 PM
Jul 2014
- On the other hand......

[center]WANTED: For destruction of the environment, pollution of the electoral-process and grand theft of democracy and justice. Both are considered to be armed with paid security flunkies, deranged, and without a shred of a soul. Do not approach them as the stench of their characters alone can be over-powering. If you see either one of these individual run, don't call a cop. They own them too.

[/center]

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
20. Ms. Pillay got it absolutely correct.
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 12:36 AM
Jul 2014

But the national security state and its minions will demand their pound of flesh since Snowden exposed them.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
24. Thankfully, the UN takes human rights as seriously as our founders.
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 01:47 AM
Jul 2014

Our founders recognized those rights as universal. So does Ms Pillay.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
23. Well, at least now
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 01:46 AM
Jul 2014

right wing Democrats can finally join right wing Republicans in screaming about how awful the UN is.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. I am glad for the revelations, as is Pillay.
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 01:59 AM
Jul 2014

Whether Snowden faces trial or not is indicative of what kind of society we have. As is the fact that Ellsberg says the case against him would not be dismissed today. As is the fact that the USG uses our tax money to violate our Constitutional rights--and with apparent impunity, I might add.

However, what happens to Snowden, as important as it may be to him and his family and friends, even as important as it may be for what it says about our country today, pales in importance to the last sentence of the prior paragraph of this post.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
35. DUH!
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 05:33 AM
Jul 2014

It's the war machine perps who should be on trial. And the heads of the NSA who violated their oaths to protect the constitution. Don't forget NSA should've prevented 911 with their billions instead of running point for the DEA and chasing around those involved with the marijuana industry.

iandhr

(6,852 posts)
41. Though I am no fan of the NSA stuff
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 04:10 PM
Jul 2014

Countries that are someone of the worlds worst human rights abusers including:


Vietnam
United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Russian Federation (but DU is pro-Russia now despite the anti-gay stuff)
Pakistan
Kazakhstan

are on the human rights council

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/CurrentMembers.aspx

So when the UN talks about human rights it should be taken with a grain on salt.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
50. He'd better stay right where he is. Because Russia CAN be trusted.
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 09:36 PM
Jul 2014

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
45. Hell, not only that...
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 06:54 PM
Jul 2014

He should be awarded the Medal of Freedom. If he had not come forth with these revelations, we would not have anything near the real chance, at least a chance, we have now to turn back our country from fascism.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
55. OK...And??
Fri Jul 18, 2014, 10:32 PM
Jul 2014

Snowden should still face trial for the things he released that weren't in the public interest...

People are getting selective memories...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Edward Snowden should not...