Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 04:25 PM Aug 2014

Judge rejects settlement in Silicon Valley no-poaching case

Source: San Jose Mercury News

A proposed settlement of a class-action suit claiming some of Silicon Valley's largest tech companies had conspired against their employees was rejected Friday for being too low.

U.S. District Court Judge Judge Lucy Koh shot down the $324 million amount that Apple, Google, Adobe and Intel agreed to with lawyers for more than 64,000 valley tech workers, who claimed the firms agreed to not poach employees from each others' workforces. The valley employees who sued over the "no poaching" agreements were expected to demand at least $3 billion from a jury if the legal fight had moved to trial, an amount that could have tripled under federal antitrust law.

In Friday's filing, Koh said that plaintiffs would receive less proportionally in this settlement than in a $20 million settlement with LucasFilm, Pixar and Intuit in the same case last year. Koh found the discount for those companies was especially egregious considering the plaintiffs' case had grown stronger since the earlier settlement, with Koh certifying it as a class action and withstanding an appeal of that decision.

... "There is substantial and compelling evidence that Steve Jobs ... was a, if not the, central figure in the alleged conspiracy," Koh later wrote.

Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_26301081/biz-break-judge-rejects-settlement-silicon-valley-no

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge rejects settlement in Silicon Valley no-poaching case (Original Post) Newsjock Aug 2014 OP
We need this Judge to preside over some of these Wall Street bank cases. Eric Holder always Dustlawyer Aug 2014 #1

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
1. We need this Judge to preside over some of these Wall Street bank cases. Eric Holder always
Fri Aug 8, 2014, 05:27 PM
Aug 2014

settles and they know it so they always low ball and still make a profit off of their crimes! Us tax payers end up footing the bill and the defendants get to deduct the settlements off of their huge profits!
Smart Judge!!!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rejects settlement ...