Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 10:22 PM Aug 2014

CNN: Ferguson police on Friday will release name of officer who shot Michael Brown

Source: CNN

Ferguson police on Friday will release name of officer who shot Michael Brown, a source close to the investigation tells CNN.

Ferguson, Missouri (CNN) -- (Breaking news update at 10:06 p.m. ET Thursday)
On Friday police in Ferguson, Missouri, plan to release the name of the officer who shot Michael Brown, a source close to the investigation told CNN's Julian Cummings. The St. Louis suburb has been the scene of demonstrations since Brown died last weekend.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/14/us/missouri-teen-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1



Now saying
Expecting the name of the officer who shot Michael Brown to be released by Ferguson PD at the top of the hour
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN: Ferguson police on Friday will release name of officer who shot Michael Brown (Original Post) cal04 Aug 2014 OP
Only fair. Cha Aug 2014 #1
So, it takes a week to get him into the witness protection program??!! oldandhappy Aug 2014 #2
Shoulda been done that!! bravenak Aug 2014 #3
A young black man was once again shot down. sheshe2 Aug 2014 #4
About Darn Time!!!! LovingA2andMI Aug 2014 #5
Way past time they did. herding cats Aug 2014 #6
I had the thought while watching the Ferguson police chief's press conference today... Cracklin Charlie Aug 2014 #7
Notice how they say "since Brown died last weekend" instead of "since Brown was killed last weekend" cui bono Aug 2014 #8
No reason not to, now that Anonymous already has. n/t eggplant Aug 2014 #9

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
6. Way past time they did.
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 11:16 PM
Aug 2014

Their excuse of not doing so due to threats made against police via social media was lame from the beginning. As if by keeping it a secret they didn't incite more anger from the citizens and the internet community?

A little respect goes a long way toward making people have some hope there will be justice. Total disregard of a the needs of the people leads to people feeling helpless and angry.

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
7. I had the thought while watching the Ferguson police chief's press conference today...
Thu Aug 14, 2014, 11:28 PM
Aug 2014

That by not releasing the name of the officer who shot Mr. Brown, the police department itself was putting all the officers in Ferguson at risk of retaliation. It would seem that without the name of this officer, the public could somehow feel that any of the officers could be the shooter. Not following their own rules with regards to release of information is not the way to inspire the public to trust and respect them. I hope that this step will help defuse the situation in my state.

I don't want to lose any more of my fellow Missourians to this type of tragedy, be they young men of any color, or police officers.

I would like to thank those around the nation who are protesting tonight for justice for Michael Brown. Even though there is much work to be done, you are an inspiration.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
8. Notice how they say "since Brown died last weekend" instead of "since Brown was killed last weekend"
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 12:00 AM
Aug 2014
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CNN: Ferguson police on ...