Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:32 PM Apr 2012

Gov. Jerry Brown unveils scaled-back high-speed rail plan

Source: San Jose Mercury News

Responding to an onslaught of disapproval over the record $100 billion price tag for California's bullet train, the Brown administration on Monday overhauled their plans and unveiled a scaled-back version of the controversial project.

By running service on an electrified Caltrain line between San Francisco and San Jose and existing rail corridors between Los Angeles and Anaheim, officials have lowered the total cost of the project to $68.4 billion to $79.7 billion. Though this is expected to produce far fewer riders and revenue because of less frequent and slower service, officials say it's the only way to build the project because the previous cost estimate was simply "too high."

The exact new cost estimate depends on the type of infrastructure that is ultimately used, such as tunnels vs. raised tracks. Regardless, the total price tag is double the $33 billion estimate voters were given but less than the $99 billion to $117 billion estimate from several months ago.

The main question, has it has been since planning began in 1996, continues to be whether the state can actually find the money to build the system. The new plan does not shed much light on this question, pushing the total estimated funding shortfall to at least $55 billion.

Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/rss/ci_20308385

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
3. BART in the Bay Area has plenty of both
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:41 PM
Apr 2012

it did fine during Loma Prieta in '89, which is more than the Cypress Freeway can say.

Of course, the Berkeley Hills Tunnel runs directly through the dangerous Hayward fault.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
11. true and Bart & both bores of that tunnel did fine during Loma Prieta.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:33 PM
Apr 2012

Matter of fact so did the Posey tunnel connecting Oakland and Alameda, oh and tunnels under Howe Street in Oakland that Kaiser built when they expanded their facility. Even the Solano Ave tunnel in Berkley, built in the 20's for the Key system's trains did just fine in that earthquake.

tinrobot

(10,895 posts)
5. On existing rail, the train will run a lot slower.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:56 PM
Apr 2012

Instead of a proper 200+ mph bullet train and a 2 hour LA - SF trip, we're talking 100+ mph fast rail and a 4+ hour trip.

Unless it's a lot cheaper than airfare and/or driving, this model is simply not going to compete.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
15. That's still faster and more pleasant than driving or flying...
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 09:47 AM
Apr 2012

But it will, as you suggest, not be as much an improvement as it needs to be to really throw off air travel.

Dammit.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
16. It was only going to go 200+ mph through the desert anyway
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 06:16 PM
Apr 2012

Info from 2008:
http://transittalk.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=highspeed&action=display&thread=116&page=3
This map shows the maximum speeds that would be allowed on the system. (Disregard the Altamont segment.) Because the high-speed trains will be confined exclusively to the LOSSAN corridor between LA and Irvine with no new right-of-way, the high-speed trains will encounter all the curves that Metrolink and Amtrak trains encounter today. Amtrak and Metrolink trains will share the tracks and passing tracks would be provided for the high-speed trains at intermediate stations.


pinto

(106,886 posts)
8. Money for the project, as always, has been a big factor. Plus political commitment and local buy-ins
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 05:51 PM
Apr 2012

Piecemeal may be the best that's doable at this time, unless something changes.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
10. The political games add to the inherent citizen resistance to rail and public transportation.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:15 PM
Apr 2012

I've got students working on posters and viral videos and things like this:

http://troll.me?p=322350

http://troll.me?p=322370

http://troll.me?p=322379

http://troll.me?p=322386

http://troll.me?p=322396

Which do you like most?

allan01

(1,950 posts)
12. re: Gov. Jerry Brown unveils scaled-back high-speed rail plan
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 07:17 PM
Apr 2012

all republican govs who had a chance of this mony to make hi speed rail work . turned it down. the repunks in the state capital(sacramento) didnt give the money to the hi speed rail athourity , but to caltrans . i hear lots of stoopid comments like in troll me . These people want to go backwards and live in a world that never existed ( the good ole days) meanwhile they( the repunks ) keep whining about traffic gridlock and sofourth. Our dream of the future has been killed by shortsighed men and women ( i dont want to pay my taxes , and or shop on the internet to avoid local sales taxes. id rather shop local at a real store and buy local as these taxes support local programs. sigh. I gues ppl would rahther be stuck in their stupid car for four hours going no where and on a train that takes me from modesto ca to losangles by bus ( 8 hours ) bleh. Id rather do 200 thanks. i dont drive and everything revolves around the car. This smacks like ncl (national car line and others in the great trolley scandal)(remember who framed roger rabbit . the premise of the story is true) a front comopnay and others set up by gm .chrysler , ford , harvey firestone , standard oil of ohio) bought the trolley lines so they could sell more cars.( and these were the same ones that george bush bailed out a few years ago giving sob stories that they were going broke)

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
14. These are the worst kinds of deals ever.
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:01 AM
Apr 2012

Hungry but can't afford a sandwich? Well, fuck that. For less money than a sandwich, I'll sell you something that you can't eat. Mmmm... delicious!!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gov. Jerry Brown unveils ...