Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 12:52 PM Sep 2014

Putin Considers Throwing Russia Into ISIS Fight: Report

Source: NBC NEWS

The next weapon in the fight against Islamic extremists in the Middle East might be Vladimir Putin. The Russian president discussed with his Security Council on Monday potentially contributing to fighting ISIS, according to Russian news agencies. The council "exchanged opinions on possible forms of cooperation with other partners on a plan to counter Islamic State in the framework of international law," Interfax quoted a Kremlin spokesman as saying.

The United States has been trying to build a broad coalition to thwart ISIS militants in Syria and Iraq, but Russia has not been part of the conversation. “The anti-ISIL coalition is not a club party — we do not expect any invitations and we are not going to buy entry tickets,” said Ilya Rogachev, an official in Russia's Foreign Ministry said last week. But Russia is a supporter of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whose regime is trying to stave off an insurgency that has included ISIS fighters.

ISIS could potentially threaten Moscow directly, too. The group's ranks include Muslims from Russia's North Caucasus region, who have been waging their own insurgency in the mountainous region following two wars between Moscow and separatists in Chechnya.

Read more: http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/putin-considers-throwing-russia-isis-fight-report-n208776

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Putin Considers Throwing Russia Into ISIS Fight: Report (Original Post) Purveyor Sep 2014 OP
This is going to get interesting. ballyhoo Sep 2014 #1
Glad to see that first sentence in the body of the comment. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #2
You beat me to it. CentralMass Sep 2014 #5
Me three lobodons Sep 2014 #16
...four C Moon Sep 2014 #20
Should we welcome him into the coalition, or has Russia's behavior over the crisis in totodeinhere Sep 2014 #3
Kerry has always said that Syria needs a diplomatic solution karynnj Sep 2014 #18
If you believe in sovereignty ozone_man Sep 2014 #26
As you know Obama is getting ready to bomb Syria without Assad's permission, totodeinhere Sep 2014 #27
Pootie Poot doesn't want us interfering with his boy in Syria. They let ISIS go for too long. TwilightGardener Sep 2014 #4
I can hardly believe the high level and depth of your analysis. delrem Sep 2014 #29
+1000. /nt Bragi Sep 2014 #31
like the pact with Stalin in WW2 uhnope Sep 2014 #6
Not really, as they don't want Ass-ad gone... Amonester Sep 2014 #8
Maybe the FSA/ISIL will now get their hands on some sophisticated surface-to-air-missiles /nt jakeXT Sep 2014 #7
They would get a couple of nukes over their heads long before that... Amonester Sep 2014 #9
I bet some people are salivating now jakeXT Sep 2014 #11
Good luck with that one LOL... Amonester Sep 2014 #12
Not enough photoshop skillz ? I don't know jakeXT Sep 2014 #15
Did you ever wonder whatever hppened to all those Stingers? None ever got diverted, EVER? marble falls Sep 2014 #22
Diverted in flight or sold to other countries? N/t jakeXT Sep 2014 #23
Either way there's a story I'd like to hear. Did we actually get the Taliban to use all of them? marble falls Sep 2014 #24
ISIL may already have such surface-to-air missiles. They claim to have shot down a Syrian jet last pampango Sep 2014 #17
Interesting. Russia would be anti-ISIS and pro-Assad. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2014 #10
We should be pro-Assad too Reter Sep 2014 #28
ever notice all those countries ending with 'Stan ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2014 #13
Their ultimate "fantasy" (as they stated repeatedly online...) is a Global Caliphate... Amonester Sep 2014 #14
Brilliant move cosmicone Sep 2014 #19
Oh jeeeez. Who are they backing, again? Al Quaeda or ISIS/ISIL or Bashir Assad or the Kurds .... marble falls Sep 2014 #21
On which side? n/t tabasco Sep 2014 #25
Interesting. It will be something to see Russia's martial powers on display here. GOLGO 13 Sep 2014 #30
The minute they're in Assad is in the clear flamingdem Sep 2014 #32
Once again Putin proves he's not a useful idiot enemy yurbud Sep 2014 #33

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. Glad to see that first sentence in the body of the comment.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:00 PM
Sep 2014

Because after reading the title, my question was going to be 'On which side?'

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
3. Should we welcome him into the coalition, or has Russia's behavior over the crisis in
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:01 PM
Sep 2014

Ukraine precluded that? I'm glad I'm not Barack Obama or John Kerry. That's a tough one. But in cases like this I'm glad that Obama is president, not some cowboy like Shrub. (No offense intended to cowboys.)

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
18. Kerry has always said that Syria needs a diplomatic solution
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 02:05 PM
Sep 2014

The problem for the US was always that there was no reason for Assad to negotiate anything. The current effort actually may change that balance - without a shot being fired. Russia has its own reasons for wanting these non state terrorists stopped. The question would be if the Russia would see the wisdom in pushing Assad to personally stand down and then be replaced in a new government that would in many ways be the same, but would have some reforms - giving both sides (Assad and moderates) some degree of a "win". Then everyone is against ISIL and AQ- including the Assad allied people, the moderates, the US, Russia, Iraq etc.

Now, in the US, this would - like the chemical weapon deal - be something the right would trash Obama for, but if they could pull this off and cool down the Middle East, it really doesn't matter what people like McCain et al, the Bush people, or the RW have to say. (By the way, have you seen anyone on the right mention that with ISIL taking over major parts of Syria, those CW could have been in their hands?)

ozone_man

(4,825 posts)
26. If you believe in sovereignty
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 08:19 PM
Sep 2014

then it's not really up to us to decide, it's up to Syria to decide if they want help, who and what kind, ... If you don't believe in sovereignty, then you might as well be Bush.

If we really want to stop ISIS, Obama should lean on Saudi Arabia and Turkey to stop the support and inflow. Maybe threaten to throw Turkey out of NATO, and whatever might work with SA. An oil embargo perhaps.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
27. As you know Obama is getting ready to bomb Syria without Assad's permission,
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 08:54 PM
Sep 2014

and he has threatened Assad with retaliation if he fires on our planes. And since Syria has an arsenal of Russian made surface to air missiles that is a real threat. I doubt if Assad will shoot at our planes, but who knows? Perhaps he feels at this pint that he has nothing to lose.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
4. Pootie Poot doesn't want us interfering with his boy in Syria. They let ISIS go for too long.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:04 PM
Sep 2014

Now that the US is going to take care of it, suddenly Pootie's going to help out? LOL.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
29. I can hardly believe the high level and depth of your analysis.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 09:44 PM
Sep 2014

If only peace in our time were in your hands...

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
8. Not really, as they don't want Ass-ad gone...
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:14 PM
Sep 2014

So I guess they want to fight the "moderate freedom fighters" the US wants to train and supply too...

1+1= 3 or 4 now...

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
9. They would get a couple of nukes over their heads long before that...
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:16 PM
Sep 2014

methinks...

signed Vladimir's Gift on them...

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
12. Good luck with that one LOL...
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:24 PM
Sep 2014

Tell me why these punks haven't blown up the dam(s) they were "controling" when they were at the receiving end of laser-guided bombs last month?

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
15. Not enough photoshop skillz ? I don't know
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:37 PM
Sep 2014






So ISIS photoshopped themselves capturing Mosul dam. If only the whole war was photoshopped
https://twitter.com/LizSly/status/497548831572369409

pampango

(24,692 posts)
17. ISIL may already have such surface-to-air missiles. They claim to have shot down a Syrian jet last
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:52 PM
Sep 2014

week using one. The FSA apparently does not have them or, at least, has not used them.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
10. Interesting. Russia would be anti-ISIS and pro-Assad.
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:18 PM
Sep 2014

That could make things even messier for the US.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
28. We should be pro-Assad too
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 09:36 PM
Sep 2014

He is not radical when it comes to religion, as those will be who would replace him.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
13. ever notice all those countries ending with 'Stan
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:25 PM
Sep 2014

in the underbelly of Mommy Russia? You can be sure that ISIS scares him as much as it scares countries around the Muddle East.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
14. Their ultimate "fantasy" (as they stated repeatedly online...) is a Global Caliphate...
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 01:29 PM
Sep 2014

So, unless Russia is not included in their "Global" goal...

Not to mention Europe, China... and North Korea too...

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
19. Brilliant move
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 02:25 PM
Sep 2014

If Russia had directly involved itself in supporting Assad, the West would have screamed bloody murder. Now that the West is going in with no regard to Syria's sovereignty and support one terrorist group over another, it has no reason to complain and no leg to stand on.

So Russia can go in under the auspices of a broad anti-ISIL group and wipe out the so called "moderate" terrorists while the US/West takes care of the more violent ones.

Once bombs are dropped by one side, all screaming and yelling about other players getting involved will be out the window because of hypocrisy.

marble falls

(57,106 posts)
21. Oh jeeeez. Who are they backing, again? Al Quaeda or ISIS/ISIL or Bashir Assad or the Kurds ....
Mon Sep 22, 2014, 03:51 PM
Sep 2014

the Sunnis, the Shiia, the Iraqi government, the secret ME allies who may or may not be Qattar, Saudi, Omani, Iranian, Jordanian .......? Pretty hard to know the players and there's no program with a list.

But at least already the French have gotten their licks in. The British and Germans'll be flying sorties soon enough.

GOLGO 13

(1,681 posts)
30. Interesting. It will be something to see Russia's martial powers on display here.
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 07:43 AM
Sep 2014

I'm sure we'll get a good look at what they can do in a hot zone against a resisting opponent

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
33. Once again Putin proves he's not a useful idiot enemy
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 12:17 PM
Sep 2014

Like terrorist.

He keeps giving our propagandist headaches by trying to be helpful like his chemical weapons deal with Syria

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Putin Considers Throwing ...