Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,535 posts)
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 11:52 AM Oct 2014

Exclusive: Hillary Clinton plans midterm blitz

Source: Politico

Hillary Clinton has mapped out much of her political schedule through Election Day, an itinerary that focuses on helping Senate candidates and includes trips to a half-dozen states, including Kentucky and presidential early states Iowa and New Hampshire, according to details obtained by POLITICO.

The plan, which could see adjustments and additions as races hit critical points in the coming weeks, was the product of close work between Clinton chief-of-staff Huma Abedin and the Democratic campaign committees.

The final stretch of the midterms will mark Clinton’s most extensive political activity since she left the State Department early last year and requests for her to appear began pouring in from all corners of the country.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/10/hillary-clinton-2014-midterm-schedule-111585.html

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. I knew she would be on the move and she is doing so.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 11:56 AM
Oct 2014

Hopefully she can swing some votes for congressional members.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
2. There are districts in which she would do more harm than good, IMO.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 11:57 AM
Oct 2014

.

I'm thinking Kentucky.

I don't think it will help Grimes earn any crossover votes away from McConnell.

I wonder if she even cares.

brooklynite

(94,535 posts)
3. So you're saying she's campaigning in districts where she hasn't been invited?
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 12:08 PM
Oct 2014

Or that she's been invited to a district where the Candidate doesn't think it will help?

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
4. I don't think I said that at all, though I think she would go invited or not just to promote herself
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 12:17 PM
Oct 2014

Since you bring it up.

She carries a lot of clout and if she wants to go to Kentucky invited or not, she is free to go there.

Add to this fact, reality may have nothing to do with it; if SHE thinks it will help Grimes that's all that matters.

Does anyone really think anyone in the McConnell Camp is going to be encouraged by Hillary to vote for Grimes?

I don't think so and if I was Grimes I wouldn't want her "help", but I wouldn't really be able to say "no" if she wants to come.

brooklynite

(94,535 posts)
7. Except that she's not...
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 01:39 PM
Oct 2014

She's going to support Grimes because Grimes wants her support, presumably to attract the people NOT currently voting for McConnell who haven't decided to support Grimes.

Just like she help out with Jean Shaheen's campaign this week....

And will be helping out with Mark Pryor's campaign next week....

But if you feel the need for more "she's only in it for herself" Hillary bashing, please proceed.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
9. She can do best in states that voted for Clinton. Didn't KY vote for him but not Obama?
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 02:38 PM
Oct 2014

Or got a lot of votes, there?

We had an article some time ago posted about how KY supported Clinton for POTUS but not Obama. May have my old south states mixed up. Something about an ex-con in Texas winning a primary there, because they didn't want Obama.

She's doing this to keep the Senate in Democratic hands and not for herself. I find the vitriol sent her way to more knee jerk and wanting to be in the 'in crowd' than based on her full voting record which someone here keeps posting to me.

Darn if I can't find it, though. One or two votes are waved around as if that is all she is, not the full thing. And yeah, she's thought of as a hawk, but so is Rand now, Cruz, blah, blah, blah. And Obama is smeared with the same thing because, like it or not, it goes with the job.

Obama has done more and taken more heat because he is disengaging us from war while keeping out word to our allies. He sees it long term.

My problem with Hillary is her manner of speaking. She is not as precise as Obama and comes off as callous at times, but apparently is quite effective in smaller settings in stating her views.

Of course she has been in the meat grinder since she dared to support women's rights and healthcare as the First Lady with her husband in office. She has been the subject of the most vicious attacks on her personally from the rightwing, and I do believe she is bitter about it and gets dismissive.

She doesn't have the expansive personality that Obama possesses, and the poise he has. I do want a good primary, with many at the debates, but if she wins, she gets my vote. If she doesn't, as sure as night follows day, some quarters will simply hate whoever gets the nomination.

After all, the DNC will nominate a Democrat and not a Socialist or Libetarian, right? Bash away!

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
13. Bill Clinton won Kentucky in 1996 by a margin less than one percent.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 06:18 PM
Oct 2014

In 2008, Kentucky went against the black dude big time.

For that state, I'm trying to look at it from the working person's POV and I can't imagine Hillary Clinton winning over many people there.

My problem with the Clintons goes back at least as far as NAFTA but the more one looks the more bad there is to find in terms of supporting corporations over human beings.

I'm also reminded of how many delegates Hillary had above Obama until it turned around, so maybe it's not a lost effort to insist on a progressive Democrat over a third way Democrat.

To the person in this thread who suggested that Warren didn't help Grimes:

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/capitolreport/2014/09/25/grimes-ad-attacks-mcconnell-for-opposing-warrens-student-loan-bill/





freshwest

(53,661 posts)
15. I'm not the person saying Warren can't help. Obama is also on the stump for candidates.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 07:11 PM
Oct 2014

Last edited Fri Oct 3, 2014, 08:21 PM - Edit history (1)

And we know how much crap is flung his way.

As far as the old third way attacks, I offer a word to the wise, from someone who is more of a socialist than most here at DU:

I am far less generous toward that attitude

Dismissing the rights and concerns of people of color and women is reactionary. It is way more reactionary than Third Way. There is nothing progressive or liberal about it, and I don't consider people who do so to be leftists. Period.

I also consider a lot of this angst about corporatism to be strange, as though they have no conception of the country they live in. There has never been a President in this country that did not promote economic interests and there never will be as long as we remain a capitalist nation. For one thing our constitution makes property sacrosanct. It is a quintessential capitalist document. I might wish for a different political system, but I know enough history and political theory to understand the role of the capitalist state.

When I articulate those ideas, which are clearly Marxist in orientation, I am called a "centrist." It's nuts. What I am is politically pragmatic. I refuse to obsess about individuals, be it Snowden or Obama, and make political decisions based on the available options at the time.

I care about the NSA but I don't give a shit about Glen Greenwald or the boxes in Snowden's garage. None of that has any relevance to the conflict between national security and civil liberties or the actions of the NSA.

In fact, it's a way of avoiding substantive discussion on those issues. THAT is why I avoid those threads.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025220376

You have disappointed me SKP, with the personal nature of your attacks on Hillary, much like those made her of Obama and Kerry. This has been the cloud that has followed her since Arkansas, and her husband as well. It is the same kind of attitude that assumes Obama is liar, a fraud, whatever.

We aren't their close confidants, we only know them by reputation (from biased media) and their acts. Take a look at this with an open heart for a moment SKP, and you may find she is more liberal and progressive than you think.

Consider the time these votes were made and do not take them out of context of the times they were made. She has creds with many because of these, no matter what picture of her media has created. Note, this is not from a HRC friendly site:

http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Hillary_Clinton_Abortion.htm#Voting_Record

http://www.ontheissues.org/Domestic/Hillary_Clinton_Civil_Rights.htm#Voting_Record

http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Hillary_Clinton_Health_Care.htm#Voting_Record

http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Hillary_Clinton_Corporations.htm

http://www.ontheissues.org/Background_Corporations.htm

http://www.ontheissues.org/Social/Hillary_Clinton_Education.htm#Voting_Record

http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Hillary_Clinton_Energy_+_Oil.htm#Voting_Record

http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Hillary_Clinton_Homeland_Security.htm#Voting_Record

http://www.ontheissues.org/International/Hillary_Clinton_Foreign_Policy.htm#Voting_Record

We are not the ones who are faced with negotiating with bunch of greedy GOP and insane baggers. When one takes a realistic view of what they are fighting back and have been fighting for years, idealism can get crushed and Maslow's pyramid comes into view. Just as many yelled that Obama betrayed them on UHC, consider what he had to work with. Yet he put UHC provisions in the ACA for states whose voters cared enough to get it done.

Warren supports Israel, is she under the bus with everyone now? So does Sanders, is he under the bus, too?

These are complicated people doing their best to serve the needs of the many. At times, strange bedfellows will appear, as no one person is all good or all bad.

You know the kind of flak you have gotten for your views on guns and your job, that were unfair. Does that mean those who we don't agree with you should be given a pass to call you RW?

I don't think so.

Would you throw Obama under the bus if he came out and supported HRC in 2016? Do you think that 2014 is not so vital, and we don't need all the help we can get?

Perhaps too many things to ask while you recover from brain surgery. Take care of yourself, and don't get upset, the last thing you need is an attack of HBP. I'm just asking you to exercize your some of your skills on this.

I admit too, that HRC comes off badly in the debates I've seen her in. The one with her in the primaries with DK, BO, Edwards, Gravel, etc. turned me off. So did those of her supporters who voted for McCain because he had a 'woman' on his ticket, really turned me off and they never came back to the party, at least the ones I knew didn't. It made a bad taste in my mouth that hasn't gone away.

But after Obama won the DNC nomination, she went on the campaign trail to try to pull her errant followers back into the fold. She gave full hearted endorsements and he accepted her with the graciousness I've come to expect from him. We won't get as a good a POTUS as we have had with him, not in my lifetime, I don't think. He was unique, there won't be another one like him.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
11. No, she wouldn't go univited.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 05:44 PM
Oct 2014

That piece of nastiness was uncalled for. Hillary is very much in demand and if Grimes hadn't invited she wouldn't be going there.

Whether some of you like it or not, the Clintons are the most popular couple within the Democratic party and they do hold sway among Democratic voters.



 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
17. 1. Start with an assumption
Sat Oct 4, 2014, 05:27 PM
Oct 2014

2. Refuse to provide evidence for the assumption
3. Note lack of immediate evidence contradicting your assumption as evidence in support of your assumption

Got it!

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
12. She has been named most popular woman in Amerca
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 06:07 PM
Oct 2014

more than any other woman in history. Some people, even in Kentucky must like her.

wolfie001

(2,228 posts)
16. The predictable RW vitriol to follow is bound to turn off female voters.
Fri Oct 3, 2014, 09:17 PM
Oct 2014

This is a good move and their anti-women platform should be highlighted. Go Hillary!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Exclusive: Hillary Clinto...