U.S. Blocks Entry for Pakistani Lawyer, Outspoken Critic of Drone Attacks
Source: Common Dreams
Published on Monday, April 9, 2012
by Common Dreams
(photo: meesh)
The U.S. government is preventing a Pakistani lawyer and outspoken critic of drone attacks from entering the country. Rights groups say the move further silences the U.S. drone program's impact on civilians across the world.
The lawyer, Shahzad Akbar, has been invited to speak at the International Drone Summit this month organized by CODEPINK and the legal advocacy organizations Reprieve and the Center for Constitutional Rights. But Akbar has not received the necessary visa nor any information regarding his application for the visa filed in May 2011.
Denying a visa to people like me is denying Americans their right to know what the U.S. government and its intelligence community are doing to children, women and other civilians in this part of the world, Akbar said. The CIA, which operates the drones in Pakistan, does not want anyone challenging their killing spree. But the American people should have the right to know.
Read more: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/04/09-2
- Yes. We. Can?
"The mathematics are Machiavellian and their logic is inescapable. For the mere price of 3000 souls, the return on investment has been exponential: tens of thousands tortured, hundreds of thousands killed, millions relentlessly survived, billions frightened lest they be next. It is the dream of real numbers, the holy grail of realpolitik, a down payment on the permanent war economy, a blank check for purchasing the dreams of future generations. It is, in short, the emperors handcrafted new clothes in full regalia."
~from Millennial Math: Nine plus Eleven=1984 by Randall Amster~
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)concept, do they.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...it's the ''reality'' of free speech they seem to have the biggest problem with.
- Particularly when that speech comes in the form of hard questions they don't want to answer.
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)There's no reason Akbar can't speak via video conference. To do so would underscore that for every technology, there is a counter-technology that can bring it down. Plus think of the view count when it's posted on YouTube.
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)which we are.
Remember when a codepink leader was not permitted to go to Canada for a bogus reason.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...for just as long as we have access to the technology. And they're working on limiting that access as we speak. Likewise, as a result of our replacing reality with a virtual one, we will have conceded more power to the very Police State that some seem unable to see.
- If they'll ignore our Constitutional rights (in full view of everyone I might add), why would we expect for them to stop there?
msongs
(67,459 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)So what.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)He probably represents the terrorist element in Pakistan anyway -- one or more of the many official Pakistani terrorist organizations funded and supported by ISI.
frylock
(34,825 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)So it is a rational and logical conclusion.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Who are funded and supported by the USA (CIA).
- Just like bin Laden used to be.....
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)The Northerner
(5,040 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)The Northerner
(5,040 posts)I'll certainly invite him to have tea.
The slaughtering of innocent civilians and countless violations of another country's sovereignty should warrant considerable attention, right?
- Shahzad Akbar
I agree 100% with the above quote.
Robb
(39,665 posts)Where a complete asshole with a history of being an asshole says something a handful of credulous DUers agree with, and becomes the latest craze?
Good luck with that.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)The Northerner
(5,040 posts)and if Shahzad Akbar can bring more attention to that issue then he should be welcomed and praised.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Are you okay with the US government denying visas because it would be embarrassed or because it's pissed off at someone?
I'm not.
What is the reason he can't get a visa?
And open one's self up to another episode of American Star-Chamber Drone Justice?
treestar
(82,383 posts)We don't really have that fact.
Homeland Security doesn't release ''facts'' to the public.
- It's for your own good though.......
treestar
(82,383 posts)Denial of a visa may be for many reasons, and there may be a way to find out about that.
Though perhaps not easily on the internet.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)state sponsored terrorism apparatus.