Politicians overseeing Internet received over $8 million from major cable companies in 2014
Source: Tech Spot
In the wake of President Obama's recent public endorsement of net neutrality, Gizmodo has released a report highlighting the campaign contributions received by politicians from the nation's four major telecom companies.
As per the report, both Democrats and Republicans received over $8 million from companies like Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Verizon, AT&T, and their trade group the National Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCTA) in this year's election alone.
What's particularly concerning is that money doled out by these companies directly reaches politicians like Ted Cruz, who is on the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, which handles internet governance and FCC oversight.
The following table breaks down exactly how much telecoms gave to the election and reelection campaigns of the politicians tasked with overseeing the already industry-friendly FCC:
Read more: http://www.techspot.com/news/58808-politicians-overseeing-internet-millionaire-cable-companies-contribution.html
SamKnause
(13,105 posts)of the U.S. government that is not corrupt.
The laws need rewritten but that will NEVER happen !!!!!!!
The corruption and greed has been allowed to fester for too long.
The Supreme Court, the Justice Department, The Courts, The Pentagon, Our Penal System, our elected officials, our appointed officials make the mafia look like Girl Scouts.
How do you get the laws rewritten when fox are guarding the hen house ??
Why should the citizens respect the laws of the land when our elected and appointed officials continue to pass one corrupt law after another ?????
It sickens me how U.S. politicians are admired and respected.
The majority have NOT earned either, just the opposite is closer to the truth.
They are proud of the lies they tell to get the uniformed and misinformed to vote against their best interests.
They are a breed of evil that I will never understand.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)getting rid of campaign contributions and holding Publicly Funded Elections. Since he would not get the big campaign contributions to be elected POTUS, we need to show him we have his back.
The other thing is to get a OWS thing going again with this being the sole issue. Most Americans, regardless of Party affiliation, agree that campaign contributions are bribing our politicians and are the method used by the Plutocrats to control and run our government. We will have to get out and fight, peacefully, and be prepared to be attacked because the Plutocrats will not give up power easily.
If we do this we will have a return of Representative Democracy again. This would solve most of our problems and reduce the Partisianship that we currently have. In that atmosphere we should be able to get them to bust up the banking and media oligopolies and really start to make a huge difference! Issues like Climate Change, which is a ticking clock, will never be properly addressed until we achieve these goals.
The question is, are people fed up enough to do something like this? If not we will continue to lose our rights and spiral downhill.
SamKnause
(13,105 posts)Alan Grayson, and Elizabeth Warren.
Occupy Wall Street was amazing !!!!!
They were crushed.
They were demonized by the media.
They were shunned by politicians.
Our politicians praise protesters in other countries, but they do not support protest in the U.S.
Our militarized police and Homeland Security view protesters as terrorists.
There are still off shoots of occupy that are doing wonderful things like paying off medical debt and stopping foreclosures.
Many of this countries great progressives supported them.
They got the attention of Wall Street and started the conversation about income inequality.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)mpcamb
(2,870 posts)But it doesn't seem possible to label this other than a conflict of interest,
one in which a person should absent oneself from voting for or against someone who gave you a very large sack of money at your door.
So, where's the court case? It doesn't seem necessary to prove tit-for-tat, and I don't think you have to show collusion. It simply needs to be an issue you can't vote on if you or your PAC or anyone in your office took money.
Dig around in the law books and land some politicians in court, somebody.
sendero
(28,552 posts).. is now a conflict of interest. Prisons filled so that the prison-industrial complex can make money. Pointless wars that are used to transfer massive wealth from taxpayers to defense contractors. As Sam said above, it HAS gotten that bad, even the beloved ACA was written by the industries involved. Banksters cripple the economy and not one of them went to jail. Even now, with banks caught red handed manipulating the precious metals markets, their punishment is pennies on the dollar in fines. Literally, it is like robbing a bank of a million dollars and your punishment is a $100,000 fine. To be fair, this is world wide, almost all of the "democratic" countries are now operating in this mode.
The only difference between the US and many third world nations is that the corruption is more subtly hidden and the average moron citizen has not figured it all out .... yet.
I suppose when half the country cannot feed itself something will be done. Maybe.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Has not been this totally owned since the 1880's.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...where Roman politicians were completely corrupted by the people who made a fortune off the spoilers of empire.
candelista
(1,986 posts)That, and hopeless corruption in the courts.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Some historians have stated that one of the reasons the Vandals and other invading tribes were able to pillage Rome with relative ease is because people stopped caring about Rome; that the corruption which had consumed almost every Roman institution at the time had also destroyed the effectiveness of those institutions to not just do what they were designed to do, but actually brought harm to the lives of Romans.
I don't want to see our society collapse, but there is so much legalized bribery going on between the government and Big Mouths/Money, and it seems like nobody can do anything to stop it, that it's hard to fight off pessimism about our future.
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)Our entire industrial base has been sold off to the Chinese. Our middle-class is been hollowed out like a gourd by greedy corporate leaders who only care about how much they can stuff into their pockets before it all comes crashing down, aided and abetted by an utterly corrupt political class.
It's over.
sendero
(28,552 posts)..... I have to agree. Historically, when this level of dysfunction is reached in a system, the only cure is a collapse.
And that is exactly what we are going to get, at some point in the future.
This cannot be fixed, it can only collapse and be rebuilt from the ground up. That is where we are headed.
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)Democracy has been sold to the highest bidders. I have no confidence we'll be able to undo this peacefully within the system. I hope I am wrong.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)SHOCKED!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Javaman
(62,530 posts)once you understand that, the rest becomes easy...or very very very depressing.
rurallib
(62,415 posts)$8 million seems a bit low. Do some groups combine forces to share one when they have a common interest?
Perhaps there should be an auction website or at least a place where you can get a current price.
When a politician is bought, do they stay bought until the next bidding cycle - er - I mean election? Or are there intervals when pieces may be bought?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,446 posts)Why do you hate Ayn Rand?
rurallib
(62,415 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Controlled Mass Media
Obsession with National Security
Corporate Power is Protected
Labor Power is Suppressed
Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Fraudulent Elections
Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Supremacy of the Military
Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Religion and Government are Intertwined
Rampant Sexism
more...
http://rense.com/general37/char.htm