Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,624 posts)
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 02:25 PM Nov 2014

Teamsters Union claims NetJets said it would fire employees if union released customer names

Source: Value Walk

by Clayton Browne

NetJets, Inc., owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B), has made threats to fire workers over the International Brotherhood of Teamsters publication of the names of rich customers who stand to benefit from NetJet’s attacks on the wages, benefits and working conditions of middle-class employees. The fractional ownership jet operator is fully owned by Warren Buffett’s holding company Berkshire Hathaway and offers jets business and leisure travel to the wealthy in 170 countries.

Teamsters Union and NetJets

Of note, the Teamsters Union represents around 600 NetJets employees who work in a variety of positions including flight attendants, aircraft mechanics, maintenance controllers, aircraft cleaners, aircraft fuelers, stock clerks and flight dispatchers. All 600 Teamsters members are currently involved in labor contract negotiations. What is particularly problematic in this case is that despite profitability and rising revenues, NetJets is greedily demanding major compensation, benefits and job security concessions in the ongoing negotiations.

A Teamsters Union press release notes that a NetJets website states a “core negotiation requirement” is “to pass as much of the savings [from employee concessions] as practicable to owners and potential owners…” The firm consistently refers to its customers as “owners.”

Statements from Teamsters officials

“NetJets’ threat to terminate middle class workers is just the latest example of this out-of-control, multi-national corporation trying to coerce and intimidate its workforce into subsidizing the global super-rich,” said Paul Suffoletto, President of Teamsters Local 284. “The employees we represent will not give up one penny so a Wall Street banker or CEO can take a cheaper vacation on a private Gulfstream jet.”

FULL story at link.




Read more: http://www.valuewalk.com/2014/11/netjets-vs-teamsters-union/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Teamsters Union claims NetJets said it would fire employees if union released customer names (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2014 OP
This is shameful and stupid. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #1
Buffett talks pretty BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #2
Outing confidential data is a good way to get anyone fired... Oktober Nov 2014 #3
Messing with the lively hood of those maintaining the planes is not smart either IdiocracyTheNewNorm Nov 2014 #4
You need a fedora, a nickname and a nice jersey accent to go with that... Oktober Nov 2014 #5
Even the military pilots don't treat the enlisted that work on their aircraft like shit IdiocracyTheNewNorm Nov 2014 #6

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
1. This is shameful and stupid.
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 02:39 PM
Nov 2014

Netjets should be seeking to hire the most trustworthy, highest quality employees to serve its customers who are presumably people whose wealth and status makes them vulnerable to all kinds of crime, envy and other problems.

Treat its employees well, if not done because it is the right thing, should be done to protect Netjet's customers. It would be sort of an insurance policy.

Netjets needs to wise up.

Never heard of the company before, but this seems so obvious to me. You would think that Netjets would check out the backgrounds and financial stability of its employees in order to insure the best service for its customers.

What idiots are running that company?

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
2. Buffett talks pretty
Thu Nov 13, 2014, 03:26 PM
Nov 2014

but when it's his own wallet, he doesn't want to pay the servants. Because a dollar means a lot to a low wage worker, and shouldn't mean as much as it does to billionaires; but it does.

 
4. Messing with the lively hood of those maintaining the planes is not smart either
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 05:42 AM
Nov 2014

Who knows what sort of accident may happen if a mechanic for example was worried more about losing their job so the super rich can save a dollar that they forget to check something or tighten that nut and the next thing that happens is the private jet has a mechanical breakdown in flight.

The NetJet 'owners' really need to think about 'do we really what to trust our lives in an airplane to the cheapest workers one can find?'




 

Oktober

(1,488 posts)
5. You need a fedora, a nickname and a nice jersey accent to go with that...
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 06:04 AM
Nov 2014

It'd be a shame if something were to happen to this lovely business you've got here. Accidents do happen you know. Me and my ...associates would be glad to look after it for you, for a price...



 
6. Even the military pilots don't treat the enlisted that work on their aircraft like shit
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 06:08 AM
Nov 2014

and that is an environment where they can get easily away with it.

It is just common sense to not screw over those that you have to entrust your life to.

Just common sense.

You want to call it a shake down fine your choice, I call it reality.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Teamsters Union claims Ne...