Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:12 PM Nov 2014

Graham: House Benghazi report is ‘full of crap’

Source: Washington Times

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday that a report on the Benghazi attack released late last week is “full of crap.”

The GOP-led House committee’s report found no failures in intelligence in connection with the 2011 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya and also found that any misinformation released after the attack was accidentally incorrect — not a deliberate attempt to mislead people.

But Mr. Graham, South Carolina Republican, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that the report is inaccurate and that the House Intelligence Committee that released the report accepted a “bunch of garbage.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/23/graham-house-benghazi-report-full-crap/



Time for South Carolina to demand a mental competency examination for Lindsey Graham.
58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Graham: House Benghazi report is ‘full of crap’ (Original Post) Thor_MN Nov 2014 OP
I remember when Graham was considered sane. merrily Nov 2014 #1
oxymorons mehrrh Nov 2014 #8
Him being from the Sough, I wonder if Obama being black is why somewhat "sane" politicians Quixote1818 Nov 2014 #35
The truth sucks Scairp Nov 2014 #43
I think Graham was always insane, but fooled folks for a while. merrily Nov 2014 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author QED Nov 2014 #2
Agree with him or not, that characterization of him is completely INAPPROPRIATE! George II Nov 2014 #23
^^That. Orrex Nov 2014 #27
I'm confused rtracey Nov 2014 #52
sorry rtracey Nov 2014 #53
I was juror # 3 Orrex Nov 2014 #26
Unbelievable - I was shocked when it came back 5-2 to keep the post. George II Nov 2014 #36
I was disappointed but--sadly--not shocked Orrex Nov 2014 #37
Didn't Graham and his ilk douggg Nov 2014 #3
Calm Down Lindsey jalan48 Nov 2014 #4
For Lindsey Graham, it will never be over til... TRoN33 Nov 2014 #5
The Benghazi fugazi BeyondGeography Nov 2014 #6
Hah...and now that HIS party has gotten to the bottom of it and they have the answers..... George II Nov 2014 #25
any guesses about what he's reaching out to touch? yurbud Nov 2014 #46
bring on the smelling salts mehrrh Nov 2014 #7
Are they even mentioning this report on FOX? arcane1 Nov 2014 #9
Gone in (less than) 30 seconds.. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #14
He must be really afraid of Hillary. McCamy Taylor Nov 2014 #10
As J.K. Trotter at Gawker put Lindsey's assessment of the situation gvstn Nov 2014 #11
well, the death of Vince Foster got 6 investigations NewJeffCT Nov 2014 #34
Socks got investigated?? Beartracks Nov 2014 #48
Yes NewJeffCT Nov 2014 #49
And there was Fala, FDR's dog....... yellowcanine Nov 2014 #55
+1 Thanks for sharing; never heard that before n/t Beartracks Nov 2014 #58
Translation: The report did not say what Graham wanted it to say Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2014 #12
Someone bring the fainting couch... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #13
Could it be? Uben Nov 2014 #15
Really? Either or? Bettie Nov 2014 #33
It can, you're right Uben Nov 2014 #44
I like how, rather than reporting that this cleared the Obama administration... Dopers_Greed Nov 2014 #16
Doesn't this guy ever have anything better to do on a Sunday morning? bluestateguy Nov 2014 #17
Republicans--their whoredom knows no bottom. nt valerief Nov 2014 #18
What we have here turbinetree Nov 2014 #19
No, he wasn't attacking Trey -- Trey's investigation has only just begun Jim Lane Nov 2014 #28
COSTS turbinetree Nov 2014 #54
go away graham still_one Nov 2014 #20
Remember back in the early part of the Wellstone ruled Nov 2014 #21
The RW meme for Obama is now "lawless" vlyons Nov 2014 #41
Lovely southern gentleman! oldandhappy Nov 2014 #22
Time to drug test Sen. Graham and Gov. Scott Walker vkkv Nov 2014 #24
graham is stupider than he appears samsingh Nov 2014 #29
I wonder what Lindsay Graham is full of? Droning Predator Nov 2014 #30
Graham is throwing a tantrum. Archae Nov 2014 #31
I think if you're full of crap, all you'll see is crap. Festivito Nov 2014 #32
Graham response to the report gets front page headlines and the report itself gets buried itsrobert Nov 2014 #38
Excellent observation, I had not noticed that feature of a Friday news dump Thor_MN Nov 2014 #42
Graham. STFU heaven05 Nov 2014 #39
Hey listen up! The sky is not blue! vlyons Nov 2014 #40
Yeah Lintseed you and the GOP are full of crap... Historic NY Nov 2014 #45
"Don't tell me what I don't want to hear, ya hear." czarjak Nov 2014 #47
About standard for Republicans now Prophet 451 Nov 2014 #51
Yep Cosmocat Nov 2014 #57
You can't fix stupid Brother Buzz Nov 2014 #56

mehrrh

(233 posts)
8. oxymorons
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:30 PM
Nov 2014

Yes, the number of Republicans who can actually think and reason logically; heartless and cruel warmongers who are not blinded by their own bigotry, racism, and hatred are becoming as rare as hen's teeth.

Quixote1818

(28,979 posts)
35. Him being from the Sough, I wonder if Obama being black is why somewhat "sane" politicians
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 04:15 PM
Nov 2014

like Graham seem to have lost their minds? Something has really set them off and the only thing I can think of would be the race issue.

Scairp

(2,749 posts)
43. The truth sucks
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 06:37 PM
Nov 2014

His fellow wingers need to talk him down. And I can't believe anyone would take his outburst seriously.

Response to Thor_MN (Original post)

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
52. I'm confused
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 09:37 AM
Nov 2014

So the Republican headed committees has set forth these findings, a senate committee has set forth these findings, and they are still wrong in Grahams eyes... Me thinks these are the eyes of a racist.

Orrex

(63,225 posts)
26. I was juror # 3
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:44 PM
Nov 2014
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

On Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:34 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

So it isn't over....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=950827

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This person's "nickname" is inappropriate!

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:42 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I agree, the nickname is inappropriate. Alerter should pick his/her fights substantively tho. Leave it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I am sick to death of this homophobic and misogyninstic shit. Graham is a vile human being, but it is unacceptable for a progressive board to use implications of homosexuality as an insult, just as it's unacceptable to use the female term "Miss" as an insult.

Hide this and all other posts that perpetuate this regressive language.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Sexist and homophobic. We can do better.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Grow up.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not clever or funny but I don't think it needs to be hidden.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Orrex

(63,225 posts)
37. I was disappointed but--sadly--not shocked
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 04:58 PM
Nov 2014

I've seen it several times in recent days, and it's been going on for quite some time.

Not sure why we've collectively decided that it's A-OK.

 

TRoN33

(769 posts)
5. For Lindsey Graham, it will never be over til...
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:21 PM
Nov 2014

President Obama's Presidency ends. Graham reserved his own confederacy hatred of Obama for no reasons.

George II

(67,782 posts)
25. Hah...and now that HIS party has gotten to the bottom of it and they have the answers.....
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:40 PM
Nov 2014

.....he's not happy with those answers. Tough luck buddy.

mehrrh

(233 posts)
7. bring on the smelling salts
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:27 PM
Nov 2014

OMG -- His party carries on costly and redundant hearings and investigations for two years -- they write a report -- and because it doesn't meet the pre-conceived ideas of Graham, he labels it a load of crap. The man just can't accept facts -- no matter on what subject -- facts don't matter to him. He relies on his "feelings" and what he has convinced himself as truth.
One of these days, I expect to see him crumple, fainting, to the floor in the throes of an enormous hissy fit,

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
11. As J.K. Trotter at Gawker put Lindsey's assessment of the situation
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:45 PM
Nov 2014
Now, this might be news to a certain segment of the population, but as the AP’s Ken Dilanian notes,the investigation largely replicated the findings of six prior investigations carried out by Congress:

Many of its findings echo those of six previous investigations by various congressional committees and a State Department panel. The eighth Benghazi investigation is being carried out by a House Select Committee appointed in May.

Here’s hoping the eighth, or the ninth, or tenth investigation will finally uncover the truth.


http://gawker.com/gop-committee-agrees-obama-didn-t-fuck-up-benghazi-1661863432

NewJeffCT

(56,829 posts)
34. well, the death of Vince Foster got 6 investigations
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 03:53 PM
Nov 2014

I believe.

Heck, Socks the Cat got investigated. Maybe Daryl Issa can investigate Bo the dog?

Beartracks

(12,821 posts)
48. Socks got investigated??
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 08:33 PM
Nov 2014

Was he being socksually inappropriate?

Wild sockscapades?

Extramarital socks?



========================

NewJeffCT

(56,829 posts)
49. Yes
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 08:43 PM
Nov 2014

I guess Republicans were concerned that the White House answered letters to Socks the Cat's fan club using White House stationary. Yes, seriously... the same Republicans that called terrorism an "empty threat" back in the mid 90s had to investigate Socks.

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2005/12/26/gop-investigated-pres-clintons-cat-but-only-plan-oversight-on-pres-bushs-admitted-illegal-spying/

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1995-01-08/features/9501080219_1_socks-white-house-hillary-clinton

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
55. And there was Fala, FDR's dog.......
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:01 PM
Nov 2014

And of course FDR had a field day with it, supposedly after being advised by Orson Welles on how to respond.

These Republican leaders have not been content with attacks on me, or my wife, or on my sons. No, not content with that, they now include my little dog, Fala. Well, of course, I don't resent attacks, and my family don't resent attacks, but Fala does resent them. You know, Fala is Scotch, and being a Scottie, as soon as he learned that the Republican fiction writers in Congress and out had concocted a story that I'd left him behind on an Aleutian island and had sent a destroyer back to find him—at a cost to the taxpayers of two or three, or eight or twenty million dollars—his Scotch soul was furious. He has not been the same dog since. I am accustomed to hearing malicious falsehoods about myself ... But I think I have a right to resent, to object, to libelous statements about my dog.[7]

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
12. Translation: The report did not say what Graham wanted it to say
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:47 PM
Nov 2014

His mind is made up, don't confuse him with facts.

Uben

(7,719 posts)
15. Could it be?
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:49 PM
Nov 2014

Hmmm? Maybe Graham is just on a witch hunt. Or, maybe he's just a fucking liar! I'll go with the latter. Scum.

Uben

(7,719 posts)
44. It can, you're right
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 07:11 PM
Nov 2014

But, there are a lot more adjectives we could tack on his lousy butt, so I was taking a shortcut. Narcissistic, hypocritical, smart mouth are just a few more examples.

Dopers_Greed

(2,640 posts)
16. I like how, rather than reporting that this cleared the Obama administration...
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 01:53 PM
Nov 2014

CNN's main headline on their site instead is that Lindsey Graham called it "crap".

Liberal bias my ass.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
17. Doesn't this guy ever have anything better to do on a Sunday morning?
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:02 PM
Nov 2014

Like maybe go to church? Sleep in? Watch some football? Spend the day with the wife and kids?

turbinetree

(24,720 posts)
19. What we have here
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:18 PM
Nov 2014

What we have is a right wing nut basically attacking his buddy Trey saying that his investigation was a sham and that your party couldn't find anything wrong even though your hypocrite tried to use the deaths as a political toy, so we now have a continuing whiner whine.

So, lets ask all you republicans out there in the hinder land this:

One: How much do you think it has cost the taxpayers in million of dollars to come this conclusion from your right wing three plus years of absolute bullsh***t ?: mad:

Two: I want to remind your ilk that you have wasted our tax dollars based on fear and hate and I think everyday we should remind everyone in your party how completely inept you really are.

And what we have here-----------is a stupid hypocrite getting $174,000 a year doing nothing except whine and to top it all off ,being given air time to spew his disillusion, and not challenged on his competency to be a representative of your party and he should be will be reminded of this fact everyday until he has a complete melt down from reality

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
28. No, he wasn't attacking Trey -- Trey's investigation has only just begun
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:57 PM
Nov 2014

You write, "What we have is a right wing nut basically attacking his buddy Trey saying that his investigation was a sham...."

Graham was attacking the House Intelligence Committee report, which followed a two-year investigation. Representative Trey Gowdy heads the House Select Committee that started its own investigation earlier this year and is expected to conduct hearings through much of 2015 and quite possibly well into 2016 (maybe even generating headlines adverse to Hillary Clinton as the 2016 campaign gets underway, but I'm SURE that that wasn't in the Republicans' minds, no, not at all).

Then of course there were the investigations by the FBI, the State Department, and the Senate.

You can't tell your Benghazi investigations without a scorecard.

turbinetree

(24,720 posts)
54. COSTS
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 12:01 PM
Nov 2014

In my reality of all of this is really simply :

Strike One: To keep reminding everyone that these hypocrites are using these deaths as a political toy, and the family requested that
they quit, but they will not, absolutely is shameful

Strike Two: Creating a new investigation by right wing republicans costing the tax payers millions without doing anything except getting
the same answer with 18 or more right wing republicans on the committee x's @ $174,000 = $3,132,000 dollars a day not
including staff or when they are in session running around in circles trying to catch there right wing tail, while we have
70,000 bridges that are falling apart in this country for example and then have a right wing hypocrite whiner, to hear him
whine again and again, stammer, jump up and down with immature hypocrisy of the results and same set of facts

Strike Three: To let the right wing nuts target Hillary all they want, but the simple fact of the matter is they defunded the protection
services of the State and these right wing nuts should be reminded by everyone about this fact and they are in some way
responsible

Strike One, Two and Three of this dog and pony show by these right wing nuts on a score card from four federal investigations and there were no balls to get on base with there right wing rhetoric, and they should be thrown out of the game for the simple fact of being stupid, deceitful and just plain despicable

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
21. Remember back in the early part of the
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:28 PM
Nov 2014

Bill Clinton Administration how Little Lindsey and a couple of other Freshman Rethugs started to formulate the Impeachment of the President. Look around and we see similar verbiage and planted articles coming out on a daily basis. Hey,the Power Structure of the Rethugs are calling in their IOU's and now their really pissed because they were check mated by M. Obama. Now the battle is on for the soul of what is left,is it going to be the hard right or the Wall Street Wing? Lindsey is just a tool of the Racist Majority of the Rethug Party and it's this statement that best describes most Rethugs. I got mine and F----You!!!

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
41. The RW meme for Obama is now "lawless"
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 06:13 PM
Nov 2014

My Congressman's (Hensarling TX-05) FB page has RWers saying over and over again to "stop this LAWLESS Obama." Lawless has become their favorite adjective, followed closely by "king" and "emperor." (King and emperor are actually nouns, but you get the point.) I don't know, the "lawless" meme really irks me. It doesn't matter what the facts are. The most important thing to them is the vicious hatred that boils up inside them and bubbles over into public discourse.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
22. Lovely southern gentleman!
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:31 PM
Nov 2014

Well spoken, clear headed, generous in attitude, accepting of government reports, polite to viewers of CNN, and totally screwy!!

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
24. Time to drug test Sen. Graham and Gov. Scott Walker
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 02:35 PM
Nov 2014

People with this much power need to be sober 100% of the time.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
32. I think if you're full of crap, all you'll see is crap.
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 03:33 PM
Nov 2014

It's all in general so there seems to be no difference between Lindsay Graham's crap and the crap he sees.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
38. Graham response to the report gets front page headlines and the report itself gets buried
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 05:26 PM
Nov 2014

Thats the liberal media.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
42. Excellent observation, I had not noticed that feature of a Friday news dump
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 06:28 PM
Nov 2014

It allows poutrage on Sunday.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
40. Hey listen up! The sky is not blue!
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 06:01 PM
Nov 2014

and snow is not white
and the sea is not salty
and dirt tastes wonderful
and babies never cry

and Lindsey Graham in not full of crap!

Historic NY

(37,453 posts)
45. Yeah Lintseed you and the GOP are full of crap...
Sun Nov 23, 2014, 07:19 PM
Nov 2014

so you would know. Apparently you weren't on the committee so you don't get to decide.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
51. About standard for Republicans now
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:44 AM
Nov 2014

They live in an alternate reality with their own versions of history, current affairs, economics, theology and jurisprudence; where conservatives are always right and liberals are not just wrong but traitorous sadists deliberately trying to destroy the USA.

These people can no longer be reasoned with.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Graham: House Benghazi re...