Psychologist says U.S. Senate's CIA report makes false charges
Source: Reuters
One of the two psychologists who devised the CIA's harsh Bush-era interrogation methods said on Wednesday that a scathing U.S. Senate report on the torture of foreign terrorism suspects "took things out of context" and made false accusations.
"It's a bunch of hooey," James Mitchell told Reuters from his home in Florida when asked for his response to the Senate Intelligence Committee's findings released on Tuesday. "Some of the things are just plain not true."
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/11/us-usa-cia-torture-idUSKBN0JM24I20141211
My headline: War Criminal claims torture report is bullshit.
Let's keep interviewing more war criminals and ask them for their expert opinions on accusations that they committed war crimes and pretend that that is "journalism".
rpannier
(24,329 posts)Cue Homer Simpson
"Kent, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't committing crimes."
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)in From Russia with Love.
Oh fuck - never mind that was Dianne Feinstein! I don't take back the Rosa Klebb comment.
Hekate
(90,681 posts)And if it wasn't for DiFi we wouldn't have this report, regardless of what she looks like.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)saying in a brief telephone interview: "I have a non-disclosure agreement (with the government) and cannot confirm or deny that I was involved in that thing."
I'm thinking Congress could likely speak for the U.S. and subpoena his lying ass and set that aside, let him speak, since he knows so much, the dirty, stinking, traitor.
Psychology. It's not just for torturing prisoners.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)and damaged his profession.
DinahMoeHum
(21,787 posts)AFAIC, he's a dead. man. walking.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)"One of the two psychologists who devised the CIA's harsh Bush-era interrogation methods said..."
What a joke
jwirr
(39,215 posts)is beyond me. Let them all come out of their holes and say their piece - they are only conviction themselves. The more they talk the more we realize they are guilty. No conscience, no morals.
Hekate
(90,681 posts)James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen. M
Response to Hekate (Reply #9)
jwirr This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)This guy can fuck off.
Of course the creator of this torture regimen is going to claim it is a bunch of hooey....
ReRe
(10,597 posts)His buddie (Jesson?) got the other half. $80 Million of OUR money went into their pockets.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Who authorized that 'hooey?'
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... classified budget.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... is good. Keeps the conversation going.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Heaven forbid we should miss any of that context.
wiggs
(7,813 posts)tells me that this report 'revelation' is probably a negotiated release of information they believe is much less damaging than the whole truth...and that there is much more out there we don't know about. Seen it time and time again....this is a pressure relief valve protecting the bigger apparatus.
There may very well be some things in the report that aren't 100% accurate, as Mitchell says, but I bet that there's not only more accuracy than inaccuracy but they are feigning outrage so that the public doesn't suspect there's a lot more out there still unrevealed.
mopinko
(70,102 posts)sigh, if we had a free press this would not work.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... they censored all but 600 pages of the full 6,000 page report, and the 600 pages, after redactions, left a total of approx 480 pages. In other words, we don't know nothing. We got less than 1/10th of the original report. We're only 1/10th as mad as we should be. I don't know about anyone else, but 1/10th of the truth does not equal truth in my mind.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Hekate
(90,681 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... on Lawrence O'Donnell's Last Word. It's at about 15-20 minutes into the hour.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)He did what he did, and he must pay for those despicable, indefensible actions.
BTW: If I may say so, your closing comments are excellent, Warren. Thanks for taking a stand on this issue.
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)"The CIA paid $80 million to a company run by the two former Air Force psychologists without experience in interrogation or counter-terrorism who recommended waterboarding, slaps to the face and mock burial for prisoners captured after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, according to the Senate investigation."
daleanime
(17,796 posts)mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)Are they trying to sound fucking quaint?
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... "crap." IOW, shit. or Bullshit. or Excrement.
They definitely know all about that stuff, don't you know. Literally.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)I'm pretty sure he was following his oath...
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Because it might do harm. Oh woe..
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)Thankfully I don't have Fox on my television...I'd probably have thrown something at it
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Thank you, G_j:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025937985
"Out of context," huh?
You bet your ass it's "out of context."
I have an idea. Let's release the WHOLE, UNREDACTED REPORT so everyone can be cleared, okay?
Veilex
(1,555 posts)Some of the things ARE true. This is probably as close to a confession of guilt as we'll get...but I'm hoping for more.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Mine: "Yet Another Bush Era War Criminal Begs To Be Tried At The Hague."
Matariki
(18,775 posts)proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)To the Editor:
Of the many tragic consequences of the Bush-Cheney administrations torture program, one of the most underappreciated and insidious has been its cost to the integrity and legitimacy of some of our most vital civil institutions.
How instructive and disheartening it is to read your accounts of the Senate torture report in conjunction with your article last month on the American Psychological Associations efforts to support C.I.A. and military interrogations.
Not only did the C.I.A. engage psychologists to develop, operate and assess its torture program, but the A.P.A. aggressively encouraged its psychologists to participate in interrogations conducted by the C.I.A. and the military while the torture program was at its peak a policy that you reported was directly influenced by intelligence officials who sought the cover of psychologists approval. The A.P.A.s leadership has a long way to go in restoring the nations trust.
PAUL ROCKLIN
Watertown, Mass., Dec. 10, 2014
The writer worked on torture-related issues from 2004 to 2008 as a senior program associate at Physicians for Human Rights.
Don't Let Psychologists Get Away with Torture
Shocking evidence of the American Psychological Associations (APA) role in the Bush-era torture program has recently come to light. Their actions are a clear violation of medical ethics and international law.
A new book by Pulitzer Prize-winning, New York Times reporter James Risen reveals previously secret emails showing that the APA worked with government officials to support psychologists involvement in torture.
Physicians for Human Rights has long documented the central role psychologists played in designing, monitoring, and implementing the use of torture on detainees in U.S. custody. Risens book reveals, for the first time, that the APA secretly permitted the CIA and White House officials to shape its ethics policies on psychologist participation in interrogations.
The APA helped legitimize health professionals involvement in torture, instead of acting independently to ensure psychologists played no role. Risen writes, The APA provided the Bush administration with needed cover something no other health professional association was willing to do.
Those in the healing disciplines should never participate in torture or other ill-treatment. The Department of Justice must launch an investigation into the APAs role in aiding the U.S. torture program. A thorough investigation of these facts is critical to restore public trust in the psychology profession and to ensure accountability for all health professionals involved in torture.
PETITION:
Message
Investigate the APA's Role in Torture
Dear President Obama,
I am gravely concerned by new evidence that the American Psychological Association (APA) developed an ethics policy to support psychologists' participation in the CIA's torture program. Any role that the APA may have played in assisting the torture and ill-treatment of detainees degrades the practice of psychology and violates core principles of human rights and medical ethics.
Psychologists and other health professionals are guided by the fundamental obligation to "do no harm." Any attempt to circumvent this principle is not only unethical, but undermines the ability of all health professionals to credibly perform their duties. Health professionals must always uphold the health and dignity of every human being.
Primary source evidence in New York Times reporter James Risen's new book, "Pay Any Price: Greed, Power, and Endless War," shows that the APA secretly colluded with the CIA and White House officials to enable psychologist participation in abusive interrogations, thereby legitimizing the use of torture. Their involvement has inflicted egregious and long-term harm on detainees. Moreover, it has damaged public trust in psychologists, to the detriment of all health professionals.
It is time for the American public to learn the truth. As we await the release of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's report on the CIA's torture program, I call on you to open a Department of Justice investigation into the APA's role in supporting Bush-era torture and providing legal and ethical justifications for its use.
For over a decade, human rights organizations alongside medical professionals have demanded accountability for all responsible for the torture and ill-treatment of detainees, including any health professionals. The systematic use of psychological and physical torture of detainees in U.S. custody violates international and U.S. law, and has been detailed in reports by Physicians for Human Rights and others.
I applaud those psychologists who have taken up the critical struggle to hold their professional association to account and to restore public trust in the rule of law. I expect no less from you, Mr. President.
Sincerely,
(Your Name)
(Your Address)
(City, State ZIP)