Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 04:46 PM Dec 2014

8 Shocking Facts About Water Consumption

Anastasia Pantsios | December 15, 2014 2:45 pm

Water is a finite resource. And its preciousness has been driven home by water wars in California, where record drought has agricultural users, fracking interests and home consumers vying for the same supply; in the southwest where the water levels in the rivers, aquifers and reservoirs that provide waters to major communities like Phoenix and Las Vegas are dropping; and in the battles being fought over withdrawing water from the Great Lakes. Reducing our water footprint is essential to conserving this life-giving substance.

We actually have two water footprints: direct and indirect. Many of us are familiar with direct water-use footprint, and may already be taking steps to reduce it: taking shorter showers, not letting the water run while we’re brushing our teeth, doing fewer loads of laundry, flushing the toilet less often or even installing low-flush toilets. We probably don’t think of our indirect water footprint often if at all, which involved the water used to make the products and services we use. Author Stephen Leahy, an Ontario-based environmental journalist, wrote about some of them in his book Your Water Footprint: The Spublished earlier this year.

A ‘water footprint’ is the amount of fresh water used to produce the goods and services we consume, including growing, harvesting, packaging and shipping,” he says. “From the foods we eat to the clothes we wear to the books we read and the music we listen to, all of it costs more than what we pay at the checkout.”

Here are some things you can do to reduce your indirect water footprint.

1. Leahy reveals that 95 percent of our water footprint is hidden in our meals. While a pound of lettuce costs about 15 gallons of freshwater and a slice of bread only 10 gallons, chocolate can cost an astronomical 2,847 gallons a pound and beef can run us 2,500 gallons. Given that raising livestock is particularly water-intensive, eating vegetarian is one good way to reduce your water footprint. Better yet, go vegan: all animal products, including cheese, eggs, butter and milk take a lot of water to produce. Chicken has a much lower water footprint than beef though, so even giving up red meat can help.

2. Think about what you drink. Tell people you’re passing on the soft drink and going for a beer because its water footprint is lower. And it is. A beer takes about 20 gallons of water to create, while soft drinks can be close to 50, depending on packaging and what sugars are used. And drink tea instead of coffee. Coffee consumes about 37 gallons of water in the production process, tea takes only 9 gallons.

More at: http://ecowatch.com/2014/12/15/water-footprint/?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
8 Shocking Facts About Water Consumption (Original Post) undeterred Dec 2014 OP
Nice thought, but no thank you yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #1
Ok so what can you cut down on? nt LiberalElite Dec 2014 #6
One thing I do is cut down on watering the lawn yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #8
Water is a scarce resource undeterred Dec 2014 #2
kick, kick, kick..... daleanime Dec 2014 #3
Tea and coffee are generally not 'uniform'. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #4
Getting a Kurig would help the water problem big time! yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #9
A kilo of rice needs 1000 to 3000 gallons of water, better than beef calorie for calorie, but water is vital Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #5
One thing these sorts of comparisons don't address Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #10
Absolutely true, the massive amounts of hot water used to liquefy tars sands for example...that is fucked up. Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #11
That go vegetarian/vegan part LiberalElite Dec 2014 #7
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Nice thought, but no thank you
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 04:53 PM
Dec 2014

I respect vegans but could never be one. And ask for a beer instead of a soda. No thanks especially if I am driving.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
8. One thing I do is cut down on watering the lawn
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 08:02 PM
Dec 2014

My sprinkler system used to run 3 times a week for 45 minutes each zone (8). I now do it once a week for an hour. All 8 zones at one time. It works out well and I am part of saving the water and environment. I can't go down much more or the HOA will be all over me for nasty looking grass.

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
2. Water is a scarce resource
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 04:56 PM
Dec 2014

and the article lists 8 ways to use less water so there is enough for everyone.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
4. Tea and coffee are generally not 'uniform'.
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 05:20 PM
Dec 2014

When I pull out the coffee pot and brew some up, I put in maybe half as much coffee as do the housemate's parents when they come to visit. Since I've got a 12 cup coffee maker, does that mean each pot of coffee 'costs' 444 gallons of water (plus the 0.75 gallons I put in the pot)? (12x37)
Or that the housemate's parents' version 'costs' 444 gallons of water while my 'half strength' coffee only costs 222 gallons? And if the 444 gallons is my version, does that mean they're spending 888 gallons every time they fire up a pot?

Plus, of course, shipping and packaging varies a lot, depending upon the type of coffee you use and the producer. Do producers who pack in hard plastic containers use more or less water than those who package in far smaller soft vacuum pack bags? What if they're shipping from distribution centers close in or far away?

Seems to me there's probably enough variability in how the numbers are calculated as to be almost meaningless, other than to simply say 'it takes a lot of water' to bring people things like coffee and chocolate.

Of course, I can grow things in my backyard to make a variety of herbal teas (The ingredient list of 'peppermint tea' I recently had at a chain restaurant was all of one ingredient long - peppermint, which I already grow out back.), which means I can make peppermint tea for basically the water I pour into the teapot.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
5. A kilo of rice needs 1000 to 3000 gallons of water, better than beef calorie for calorie, but water is vital
Sat Dec 20, 2014, 06:20 PM
Dec 2014

to all food production.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
10. One thing these sorts of comparisons don't address
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 10:55 AM
Dec 2014

is 'what happens to that water' after it's used. If I'm growing rice in a humid environment, a lot will simply wind up right back in the air and soil. It's not being polluted (well, unless I'm spraying it with pesticides) and it will simply be 'reused' when it rains again.

I think there needs to be a differentiation between 'growing' water, which might simply be environmental precipitation, rather than provided irrigation, and 'processing, packaging, and transportation' related water, which all has to be pumped up from somewhere, used, probably contaminated, and require treatment before it winds up back in the environment.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
11. Absolutely true, the massive amounts of hot water used to liquefy tars sands for example...that is fucked up.
Sun Dec 21, 2014, 11:56 AM
Dec 2014
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»8 Shocking Facts About Wa...