Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 01:51 PM Jan 2012

Risk of 'Accidental' Gulf War on the Rise

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,812199,00.html

Everything on display last week in the Strait of Hormuz was pure theater. There were tough words, risky posturing, well-acted one-person pieces and even a taste the risqué, but not much in terms of a plot.

Or at least that's how it was on the stage of the fifth Fujairah International Monodrama Festival (FIMF).

"The world passes through here," the festival's director said during the opening ceremony on Jan. 22. With that, he was hardly referring to the flotilla of warships approaching the small emirate of Fujairah at that very moment, made up of the American aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, a guided missile cruiser, two destroyers, the British frigate HMS Argyll and the French frigate La Motte-Picquet. All of them were sailing west through the Strait of Hormuz toward the Persian Gulf. The US military already refers to this zone as a "theater," a possible scene of combat.

The Persian Gulf hasn't seen this kind of display of naval power since the final campaign against Saddam Hussein. Indeed, its size has prompted many to wonder whether it is merely posturing and bluffing or, rather, a sign of an upcoming fourth war in the Gulf.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Risk of 'Accidental' Gulf War on the Rise (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2012 OP
Curious, does Iran Lawlbringer Jan 2012 #1
Yes. Particularly, its anti-shipping capabilities. leveymg Jan 2012 #3
In 2007-08, there were 3 Carrier Battle Groups in the region. So, hardly leveymg Jan 2012 #2
I read that it was because Israel was threatening to attack Iran. tabatha Jan 2012 #4
That too. leveymg Jan 2012 #6
Nothing accidental about it. nt bemildred Jan 2012 #5
All quite calculated, I have to agree. leveymg Jan 2012 #7
Trust me, it will be anything but an accident Demeter Jan 2012 #8

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. Yes. Particularly, its anti-shipping capabilities.
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 02:14 PM
Jan 2012

Iran has many hundreds of modern anti-ship missiles of various types - both on numerous small fast boats and roaming around in mobile launchers mounted on delivery trucks (that look just like any other delivery truck) or hidden under sand dunes near the shoreline that extends for hundreds of miles along Iran's western and southern coasts.

It would be practically impossible to get them all, and it takes only one hit (in several "right spots&quot to sink a Nimitz-class carrier or a supertanker, effectively blocking the narrow shipping channels through the Straits along with 40 percent of the flow of oil going to the world market.

Not a very inviting theater of operations.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
6. That too.
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 02:22 PM
Jan 2012

But, I think the Saudis and Gulf States deserve a lot of the credit for creating tensions, that every time the risk-premium on crude oil prices goes up a point, they make another ten billion Dollars, or Euros, or Renminbi, or whatever they prefer these days.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
7. All quite calculated, I have to agree.
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 02:30 PM
Jan 2012

Another costly, protracted optional war should address remaining concerns once voiced openly at Davos about reigning in "the last rogue superpower," once and for all.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Risk of 'Accidental' Gulf...