Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
I Was Sexually Assaulted At UVA. I Don't Accept the Reporter's Apology.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/theslice/i-was-sexually-assaulted-at-uva-i-dont-accept-erdely-apologyIt's very good, read the whole thing. Excerpt:
On my first day of training to work on the rape crisis hotline, I was taught to accept confusing stories as fact. They told me to ask for clarification if I struggled to reconcile details, but I had to learn to let the person on the other end of the line fill in their own blanks. My job was and is to listen to people re-live trauma and believe them unquestioningly and unflinchingly. Its a job Ive done for countless friends, family members and strangers over the last decade, and I keep a well-worn folder of resources, phone numbers and pamphlets in the top drawer of my desk. Youd be surprised how often I use it.
The brain often protects you from horrific experiences, sometimes excising the worst parts from your memory with surgical precision. This defense mechanism means many survivors stories are replete with long gaps and meandering timelines (though it bears repeating that you one can substantiate their stories at least 92 percent of the time). An advocate is often the only person a survivor knows who can set aside reservations and listen without judgment. A survivors right to that kind of unconditional support is sacrosanct.
...
But Erdely is not an advocate. Shes a journalistone who is advocating for social change, but a journalist nonetheless. Her job, and the job of her editors, is to wade through all the irrelevant asides and tell a concise story. To do that means that you have to double-check every cruel detail, even when that makes you unpopular with your subject, and even when that means scrapping a major investigation for a national magazine. You have to be prepared for turbulence when youre reporting on sex crimes in a world that thinks vindictive women lie about rape when they dont get a second date and assault only happens in dark alley when youre walking alone. To behave in any other fashion furthers those lies and does a grave disservice to the millions of men and women who have survived sexual violence.
...
When a someone agrees to tell his or her story, you must tell them youre going to ask questions they dont like. Let them walk away from the story if they arent prepared for how ugly and thorough the reporting can be. They need to know that you cant shield them from the painful necessity of verification on account of the living hell theyve walked through. It doesnt feel good to cast aspersion on a trauma victim, but its not the survivors job to be able to craft a perfect, linear plotits yours. As a journalist, you are not their friend, and you are not their advocate. That is someone elses job, and you cant lose sight of that for a minute.
...
I do not accept Erdelys apology and neither should you. Erdely says she allowed her concern for Jackies well-being...fear of re-traumatizing her, and...confidence in her credibility to take the place of more questioning and more facts and that she wont make these mistakes again, but its too late for a nicely worded mea culpa. When Rolling Stone decided to go ahead without knowing the lifeguards name or verifying his existence, they contributed to the environment that allowed my assailant to walk up to me in a crowded public space and joke about trying to rape me. Erdelys self-serving actions, and those of her editors, let college administrators, fraternities and police departments go back to pretending that sexual violence isnt a problem. Im sorry, but sorry isnt good enough.
The brain often protects you from horrific experiences, sometimes excising the worst parts from your memory with surgical precision. This defense mechanism means many survivors stories are replete with long gaps and meandering timelines (though it bears repeating that you one can substantiate their stories at least 92 percent of the time). An advocate is often the only person a survivor knows who can set aside reservations and listen without judgment. A survivors right to that kind of unconditional support is sacrosanct.
...
But Erdely is not an advocate. Shes a journalistone who is advocating for social change, but a journalist nonetheless. Her job, and the job of her editors, is to wade through all the irrelevant asides and tell a concise story. To do that means that you have to double-check every cruel detail, even when that makes you unpopular with your subject, and even when that means scrapping a major investigation for a national magazine. You have to be prepared for turbulence when youre reporting on sex crimes in a world that thinks vindictive women lie about rape when they dont get a second date and assault only happens in dark alley when youre walking alone. To behave in any other fashion furthers those lies and does a grave disservice to the millions of men and women who have survived sexual violence.
...
When a someone agrees to tell his or her story, you must tell them youre going to ask questions they dont like. Let them walk away from the story if they arent prepared for how ugly and thorough the reporting can be. They need to know that you cant shield them from the painful necessity of verification on account of the living hell theyve walked through. It doesnt feel good to cast aspersion on a trauma victim, but its not the survivors job to be able to craft a perfect, linear plotits yours. As a journalist, you are not their friend, and you are not their advocate. That is someone elses job, and you cant lose sight of that for a minute.
...
I do not accept Erdelys apology and neither should you. Erdely says she allowed her concern for Jackies well-being...fear of re-traumatizing her, and...confidence in her credibility to take the place of more questioning and more facts and that she wont make these mistakes again, but its too late for a nicely worded mea culpa. When Rolling Stone decided to go ahead without knowing the lifeguards name or verifying his existence, they contributed to the environment that allowed my assailant to walk up to me in a crowded public space and joke about trying to rape me. Erdelys self-serving actions, and those of her editors, let college administrators, fraternities and police departments go back to pretending that sexual violence isnt a problem. Im sorry, but sorry isnt good enough.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1112 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I Was Sexually Assaulted At UVA. I Don't Accept the Reporter's Apology. (Original Post)
geek tragedy
Apr 2015
OP
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)1. Kick and Rec..n/t