Hillary Clinton’s Soft Populism Is Not Enough
Hillary Clintons Soft Populism Is Not Enough
John Nichols on April 12, 2015 - 7:09 PM ET
Clintons decision to open her second presidential campaign on a populist note is a reflection of her savvy recognition that plenty of Democrats have doubts about her past support for free trade deals and her closeness to financial elites that are far more committed to their own self-interest than to the public interest. But the times demand more than just a populist note. They demand progressive populist specifics.
This is not 2008, when the economy was turning bad. This is 2015, and tens of millions of Americans have experienced a rough seven-year period of unemployment, wage stagnation, uneven recovery and growing inequality. Through a portion of that period, the country had a Democratic president and a Democratic Congress; Obama, Pelosi and Reid delivered some relief, as well as mild healthcare reform and banking regulation. But the polls suggest that Americans are unsatisfied.
When Republicans took charge of the House in 2011, gridlock replaced whatever remained of hope and change. Yet, now, Republicans such as Jeb Bush pitch themselves as born-again champions of working Americans, griping about depressed wages and slow growth. Thats cynical. But it will not be enough to simply call Bush and Scott Walker out on their cynicism, and it will not be enough to echo their vapid expressions of concern for the vast majority of Americans for whom the economy is not working.
The Democratic nominee in 2016 has to propose a specific populism that recognizes the failure of free-trade deals such as NAFTA and join Elizabeth Warren in rejecting proposals to Fast Track a Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement that critics warns will be NAFTA on steroids. The Democratic nominee has to recognize that the Dodd-Frank reforms were insufficient and that Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown is right when he proposes to break up too-big-to-fail banks. The Democratic nominee must recognize the need to raise new revenues, as Congressman Keith Ellison has with his proposal for a Robin Hood Tax on financial speculation. The Democratic nominee must, as Congresswoman Barbara Lee does, recognize the need to steer money away from bloated Pentagon budgets and toward meeting human needs. The Democratic nominee must, as Bernie Sanders does, recognize the absolute necessity of massive federal investments in infrastructure and programs that create and sustain living-wage jobs.
Those are the basicsalong with commitments to expand Social Security, address climate change and reduce the influence of corporate interests on our politics and governance. To achieve baseline credibility as a contender, not just for the nomination but for the presidency, Clinton must offer specifics on all of these issues. No one should presume she will do this on her own. This is why progressive groups such as National Peoples Action and the Campaign for Americas Future are arguing that a detailed populist agenda is essential to victory. This is why the Progressive Change Campaign Committee has launched a Ready for Boldness campaignplaying off the Ready for Hillary message of Clintons early supporterswith support from US Senators Harry Reid, Elizabeth Warren, Al Franken, Jeff Merkley, and Sheldon Whitehouse; former US Senators Tom Harkin and Ted Kaufman and hundreds of activists in Iowa and New Hampshire. PCCC co-founder Adam Green is certainly right when he says, Its a great general election strategy to embrace these economic populism issues that are wildly popular across the political spectrum.
Activist pressure is essential, and it may move Clinton some. But a real race for the nomination, as opposed to a coronation, is the best guarantee that the party will produce a sufficiently populist nominee to strike the chords that will inspire voters. If Clinton is not up to the task, then Democrats had better find an alternative. If Clinton recognizes that she must not merely note the crisis but address itrecognizing the concerns about her record and answering them with an economic agenda that makes real the populist promisethen she will have the right message for a nomination fight and for a November fight that will require a lot more than platitudes.
More at..........
http://www.thenation.com/blog/204041/hillary-clintons-soft-populism-not-enough
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Maybe it will push her more to the left, it is why I want
B^E^R^N^I^E
TO PUSH
Faux pas
(14,672 posts)I believe that hrc has a secret deal with big biz. She'll play to the rabble with a gigantic WINK to the big donors. I don't trust her at all.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)By losing the election.
Warren's arrows are mostly left, and none go right.
^W^A^R^R^E^N
Clinton is a little right and a little who knows what.
^C^L^I^N^T^O^N
Faux pas
(14,672 posts)DJ13
(23,671 posts)She will say whatever it takes to win, then govern in whatever manner she wants to once in office as a means of paying back her big money contributors.
See Obama for an example.
pansypoo53219
(20,974 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)yes?