Americans Warm to Redistribution
By Christopher Flavelle
a A
The erosion of the U.S. middle class is changing how Americans see themselves. It might also be changing the way they view government redistribution of wealth.
The stagnation of earnings for most American households has been well established. From 1979 to 2007, real after-tax income grew 37 percent for the middle three-fifths of households. (For the top 1 percent, it nearly tripled.) Real median household income in 2013 was 8.7 percent below its 1999 high. The average hourly wage last year was lower, in constant dollars, than when Richard Nixon was president.
Safety Net
How to address that stagnation is one of the great questions of modern U.S. politics, and there are plenty of ideas on how to fix it -- from controlling health-care costs and fixing the tax code to learning how to live in a labor market increasingly full of robots. But stagnating wages raise yet another interesting question: Is all this chipping away at Americans' aversion to using government programs to redistribute wealth?
The data says yes, but gently. The fading fortunes of most households have coincided with an identity shift: According to the Pew Research Center, the share of adults who identify themselves as lower class is now almost as great as those who see themselves as middle class.
As the share of Americans who identify as middle class has fallen below 50 percent, the perceived link between effort and outcomes has weakened, too. Just before the tech bubble burst in 2001, three-quarters of Americans surveyed said hard work and determination were enough for most people to get ahead. By last year, that number had fallen to 60 percent.
MORE...
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-05-14/americans-warm-to-redistribution
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Now that most Americans are being affected by this, they care?
This reminds me of the tea partiers who want Obamacare after they get sick.
AwakeAtLast
(14,124 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Warpy
(111,255 posts)and 40+ years of unbroken conservative rule is finally being recognized for what it is: grand theft from labor on a scale never before seen in the world.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)It was VOLUNTARY redistribution.
Instead the rich kept the money for themselves.
(They needed it to buy DC.)
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Oh my bad ...they do create jobs for Wall Street stock brokers, gardeners, servants and chauffeurs.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)to the 1% and outwards to cheap labor in other countries.