Anarchy in the House
REPUBLICANS arent big fans of Karl Marx, but perhaps they should ponder his observation that history repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce. As preposterous presidential candidates dominate the polls and extremists topple congressional leaders, the Republican Party is headed for a replay of the catastrophic Goldwater revolt of the early 1960s. It may be an entertaining spectacle, but its dangerous.
The Republican Party has long been divided into comparatively moderate and conservative factions, but historically the conservatives were realists, too. Senator Robert Taft of Ohio, the great conservative leader of the mid-20th century, understood that his side had to make incremental steps toward its goals. It had to devise detailed policy alternatives to Democratic proposals, work with party leadership and build coalitions both within the party and across party lines.
But the early 1960s witnessed an overthrow of Taftian realism. The radicals who coalesced around Senator Barry Goldwaters insurgent presidential campaign were zealots. They had no interest in developing a governing agenda. Their program consisted mainly of getting rid of the New Deal and every other government effort to promote the general welfare. As Goldwater famously wrote: My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones.
Goldwaters followers viewed any Republicans who wanted to govern as traitors to be stamped out. . .
The Republican Partys unhappy ideological adventure in the early 60s ended in disaster. Goldwater not only lost the election in a landslide, but he dragged down the entire Republican ticket. The main result of conservative overreach was to hand President Lyndon B. Johnson the liberal supermajority he needed to pass Medicare and Medicaid.
The present resurgence of anti-governing conservatism is also likely to end badly for Republicans. The extremists have the ability to disrupt the Congress, but not to lead it. Their belief that shutdowns will secure real concessions is magical thinking, not legislative realism. And the more power they gain, the less likely it becomes that a Republican-controlled Congress can pass conservative legislation, or indeed any legislation at all.
Its true that sometimes no legislation is better than bad legislation. But the United States faces real problems, including stagnant wages, family instability, infrastructure collapse and long-term indebtedness. If Republicans cant advance their own solutions, theyll have to deal with what Democrats or harsh realities impose on them. Paralysis is not a plan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/29/opinion/anarchy-in-the-house.html?
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)now who is LAUGHING while he denies climate change.
Here I go again, I need to get the fuck away from all this because I cant control my blood pressure.
And to the House, children in adult bodies, aka American Taliban or Teaparty, are bound and determined to destroy this country
HERE IS WHAT I DONT GET, I heard that there is less than 30 hardline or teaparty crazies in the house.
If that is true, how can that few dictate anything?
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)way for the current crop of ideological assholes. A generation out in the wilderness would be good for the Republican party, and of course the country as well.