Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Toon - Religious Exemptions for Piety and Profit
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2012/01/08/opinion/sunday/the-strip.html?ref=sunday#1
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 3683 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (30)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Toon - Religious Exemptions for Piety and Profit (Original Post)
n2doc
Feb 2012
OP
I'm not down with that. We need partnerships with CONTROL in the hands of public standards
patrice
Feb 2012
#5
that is, DYNAMIC public standards entities, along the same model as that used by OWS. nt
patrice
Feb 2012
#6
zorba1010
(8 posts)1. THE CHURCH
MORAL OUTRAGE
The latest attack on President Obama is ''moral outrage'' about the church providing contraceptives to women. Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich are almost hysterical in their condemnation of Obama's plan to force the church to provide contraceptives to women. Ok, I'll go along with the Republicans on this issue, but first, let's take away the church's tax free status. How on earth did they manage to sucker us into that law? Imagine this: the Republicans will fight to the death to keep the tax free status for all religions--religions that are sitting on hundreds of billions of dollars in cash, while they complain about the poor getting food stamps. Now that's immoral. You want more immoral acts? Try this on for size: the Vatican protects the cardinals who protect the bishops who protect the priests who rape little boys. There is no question that the hypocrites are in charge of the Republican party. Today, Santorum said that ''faith'' is more important than a women's right to contraceptives. He, Romney, and, Gingrich are against contraceptives even in the case of rape, incest, and to save the mother's life. People who believe this do not belong in America of the 21st century. We need a time machine to send these people back to Italy or Spain during the "Inquisition'', where they would be more than welcome by the clergy. I'm not sure that these three imbeciles (Castro's words) would do the raping and torturing; however, I would not rule out voyeurism.
R.T.
zbdent
(35,392 posts)2. One easy solution to the Church's need to follow fed regulations ...
stop taking any monies from the Government ...
Rely on all that Nazi gold in the Vatican basement to pay for all the "help" the Catholic Church is alleged to be doing with the Govt money ...
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)3. No more tax exemptions for ANY religious organization.
Time to pay tax on your charlatan gains.
patrice
(47,992 posts)5. I'm not down with that. We need partnerships with CONTROL in the hands of public standards
entities.
patrice
(47,992 posts)6. that is, DYNAMIC public standards entities, along the same model as that used by OWS. nt
patrice
(47,992 posts)7. How about tax exemptions for secular public service organizations?
patrice
(47,992 posts)4. JOBS subsidized by our taxes and on the systemically guaranteed backs of the poor & elderly: SaintCo
Un-ending poor & elderly = Un-ending jobs for SaintCoC.
PRIVATE/**AT-WILL** employment created my/our PUBLIC money.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)8. K&R n/t