Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:00 PM Jan 2016

WAPO: Oil companies are drilling on public land for the price of a cup of coffee.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/06/16/oil-companies-are-drilling-on-public-land-for-the-price-of-a-cup-of-coffee-heres-why-that-should-change/

Oil companies are drilling on public land for the price of a cup of coffee. Here’s why that should change.
Renting public land to some of the wealthiest corporations in the world for as little as $1.50 an acre per year is irrational.

By Jayni Foley Hein
June 16, 2015


Jayni Foley Hein is the policy director at the Institute for Policy Integrity at NYU School of Law. She recently authored a report on federal natural resources leasing, here http://policyintegrity.org/publications/detail/harmonizing-preservation-and-production/

One of the U.S. government’s largest sources of non-tax revenue comes from the land it leases to oil, gas and coal companies. Last fiscal year, the federal government generated more than $13 billion from drilling and mining activities on its land – but it should have made hundreds of millions of dollars more. Antiquated pricing rules have given these energy companies access to federal lands at prices that ignore decades of inflation, as well as many environmental and health costs of fossil fuel production.

Even as the average annual price for oil produced in the United States tripled in a decade, the minimum price the federal government charged for leases remained stagnant. In fact, for decades, the minimum bid to lease public land for fossil fuel production has been just $2 an acre. Annual rental fees, which companies pay to hold and explore federal lands before production, are just as low. And the royalty rate for oil and gas produced onshore has remained at just 12.5 percent since 1920. Those bargain prices give private companies a windfall while depriving American taxpayers of a fair return from energy production. Instead, the public has been left to pay for many of the social and environmental costs of fossil fuel operations, from road damage to respiratory problems.

The public’s share of the revenue from domestic energy production is held down by an outdated fiscal system managed by the Interior Department, which oversees oil and gas development on federal land. The department does not regularly evaluate or update the fiscal terms for its oil, gas and coal leases. This longstanding issue has become more pronounced as hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as “fracking,” has caused domestic energy production to soar, increasing its potential to become an even larger source of revenue for federal and state governments. Although fossil fuel production on federal lands has declined in recent years, oil, gas and coal from public lands – including offshore leases – still account for 25 percent of total U.S. fossil fuel production. Coal production on federal lands, alone, accounts for 40 percent of the U.S. total.

While the $2 minimum bid for federally auctioned oil and gas leases is only the starting price, about 40 percent of existing leases were sold at that level. Further, annual rental fees for onshore oil and gas leases – $1.50 per acre during the first five years and $2 per acre each year thereafter – allow drilling companies to hold and explore mineral leases for the price of a cup of coffee.

<>
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WAPO: Oil companies are drilling on public land for the price of a cup of coffee. (Original Post) proverbialwisdom Jan 2016 OP
Nice timing on this. mpcamb Jan 2016 #1
Iraqis fought tooth & nail to against getting such a small cut of their oil income. Americans don't yurbud Jan 2016 #2
That 1/8th (12.5%) royalty rate is way overdue for a boost. Paladin Jan 2016 #3

mpcamb

(2,878 posts)
1. Nice timing on this.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:21 AM
Jan 2016

I know it's 6 months old but with the yahoos in Oregn whining about their 'rights' being trampled on, it's a fine time to cut to the core of the issue.
It's public (read:OUR) land that is over-grazed or sloppily mined at give-away prices.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
2. Iraqis fought tooth & nail to against getting such a small cut of their oil income. Americans don't
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 09:32 AM
Jan 2016

even realize the oil in the ground in America belongs to all of us and we deserve a bigger piece of the profits.

Paladin

(28,279 posts)
3. That 1/8th (12.5%) royalty rate is way overdue for a boost.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 11:34 AM
Jan 2016

On private lands, a 12.5% royalty (i.e., funds payable on production, once it's established) has been an antiquity for some time now. Private landowners routinely secure 1/6th (16.66%), 1/5th (20%), and 1/4th (25%) royalty rates for leasing their lands, depending on how promising the area is in which their lands are located. There's no reason for such a low royalty rate to be maintained on federal lands---unless those lands are genuinely wildcat in nature and located miles away from existing exploration plays.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»WAPO: Oil companies are d...