Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Where Were the Post-Hebdo Free Speech Crusaders as France Spent the Last Year Crushing Free Speech?
by Glenn Greenwald
Its been almost one year since millions of people led by the worlds most repressive tyrants marched in Paris ostensibly in favor of free speech. Since then, the French government which led the way trumpeting the vital importance of free speech in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo killings has repeatedly prosecuted people for the political views they expressed, and otherwise exploited terrorism fears to crush civil liberties generally. It has done so with barely a peep of protest from most of those throughout the West who waved free speech flags in support of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists.
Thats because, as I argued at the time, many of these newfound free speech crusaders exploiting the Hebdo killings were not authentic, consistent believers in free speech. Instead, they invoke that principle only in the easiest and most self-serving instances: namely, defense of the ideas they support. But when people are punished for expressing ideas they hate, they are silent or supportive of that suppression: the very opposite of genuine free speech advocacy.
Days after the Paris march, the French government arrested the comedian Dieudonné Mbala Mbala for being an apologist for terrorism after suggesting on Facebook that he sympathized with one of the Paris gunmen. Two months later, he was convicted, receiving a suspended two-month jail sentence. In November, on separate charges, he was convicted by a Belgian court for racist and anti-Semitic comments he made during a show in Belgium and was given a two month prison term. There were no #JeSuisDieudonné hashtags trending, and its almost impossible to find the loudest post-Hebdo Free Speech crusaders denouncing the French and Belgian governments for this attack on free expression.
In the weeks after the Free Speech march, dozens of people in France were arrested for hate speech or other acts insulting religious faiths, or for cheering the men who carried out the attacks. The government ordered prosecutors around the country to crack down on hate speech, anti-Semitism and glorifying terrorism. There were no marches in defense of their free speech rights. ................(more)
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/08/where-were-the-post-hebdo-free-speech-crusaders-as-france-spent-the-last-year-crushing-free-speech/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 954 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Where Were the Post-Hebdo Free Speech Crusaders as France Spent the Last Year Crushing Free Speech? (Original Post)
marmar
Jan 2016
OP
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1. Classic Greenwald myopia.
1) sentences and fines vs people getting gunned down;
2) Never mind about those attacks this past November;
3) how many people have Jews killed in France over the past year? over the past 50 years?
4) Greenwald somehow thinks defaming Mohammed is as bad as inciting violence towards Jews. Derp.
For those who are interested in the legalities:
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/french-law-treats-dieudonne-charlie-hebdo-differently
The different treatment accorded to Charlie Hebdo and Dieudonné is, however, built into Frances complex cluster of laws regulating protected speech. These laws are alternately very free and highly restrictive. Right after the French Revolution, France abrogated its old laws making blasphemy a crimeand so Charlie Hebdos blasphemous depictions of Muhammad are not a crime. At the same time, Frances press laws, which date to the late nineteenth century, make it a crime to provoke discrimination, hatred, or violence toward a person or group of persons because of their origin or belonging to a particular ethnicity, nation, race, or religion. In other words, you can ridicule the prophet, but you cannot incite hatred toward his followers. To take two more examples, the actress Brigitte Bardot was convicted and fined for having written, in 2006, about Frances Muslims, We are tired of being led around by the nose by this population that is destroying our country. Meanwhile, the writer Michel Houellebecq (whose new novel was featured in the issue of Charlie Hebdo that came out just before the attack) was brought up on charges, but acquitted, for having said in an interview that Islam is the stupidest religion. Bardot was clearly directing hostility toward Muslim people, and was thus found guilty, while Houellebecq was criticizing their religion, which is blasphemous, but not a crime, in France.