Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 01:00 PM Feb 2012

Despite Walmart and Starbucks divided we stand. By Colin Woodard

Despite Walmart and Starbucks divided we stand
Regionalism explains a lot about disagreements in U.S. politics and policies.
By COLIN WOODARD McClatchy Newspapers

In U.S. presidential campaigns, you can expect to hear a lot about the Founding Fathers, and how their ideals, intents and spiritual beliefs are allegedly in sync with those of whichever candidate is speaking of them at the time. In contentious times like ours, the Founders are regularly summoned from their graves to provide direction. If we could only recognize and embrace their instructions, the candidates argue, then we could find our lost sense of common purpose, restore our civic virtue, and finally return the Union to unity.

But these arguments are frustrated by the simple fact that the men who came together to confront a common enemy in 1775 and to craft an enduring alliance in 1789 were not our country's founders, but rather the founders' great- or great-great-, or great-great-great-great-grandchildren.

The real founders -- early-17th-century Puritans and Dutch West India Company officials, mid-17th-century English aristocrats, late-17th-century West Indian slave lords and English Quakers, early-18th-century frontiersmen from Ulster and the lowlands of Scotland, and so on -- didn't create an America; they created several Americas.

Some of these American societies championed individualism, others utopian social reform. Some believed themselves guided by divine purpose, others by freedom of conscience and inquiry. Some embraced an Anglo-Protestant identity, others ethnic and religious pluralism. Some valued equality and democratic participation, others deference to a traditional aristocratic order modeled on the slave states of classical antiquity.

http://media.pressherald.com/images/300*228/portland-press-herald_3613177.jpg

http://www.pressherald.com/opinion/despite-walmart-and-starbucks-divided-we-stand_2012-02-19.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Despite Walmart and Starbucks divided we stand. By Colin Woodard (Original Post) bluedigger Feb 2012 OP
I've read his book "American Nations", good read. Odin2005 Feb 2012 #1
I'm going to have to pick it up. bluedigger Feb 2012 #2
I definitely relate to Minnesota being part of "Yankeedom" Odin2005 Feb 2012 #3

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
2. I'm going to have to pick it up.
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:48 AM
Feb 2012

I just watched this very good interview about it with Judy Woodruff at PBS Newshour:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/entertainment/july-dec11/colinwoodard_11-24.html


I always thought eastern Maine was part of New France...

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
3. I definitely relate to Minnesota being part of "Yankeedom"
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 02:56 PM
Feb 2012

In many ways we Scandinavians and Lutheran Germans of the Upper Midwest have come to "out-Yankee" the original Yankees of New England. Stoic, community-oriented, in favor of using government to better society, Etc.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Despite Walmart and Starb...