At Mexico’s lone gun store, even the boss discourages sales
At Mexicos lone gun store, even the boss discourages sales
Originally published August 16, 2016 at 9:06 pm
NICK WAGNER
The Associated Press
MEXICO CITY (AP) Theres just one place in all of Mexico where you can legally buy a gun. Its tucked away in an anonymous building on an army base in the capital, staffed by soldiers.
Those who enter must surrender any cellphones, tablets or cameras, remove caps and pass through a metal detector. Weapons are kept in locked glass cases, unlike many of the 50,000-plus U.S. gun shops where used-gun racks on showroom floors allow easy access and clerks are happy to let you heft an unloaded firearm.
Mexicos constitution guarantees citizens right to own a handgun and hunting rifles for self-defense and sport. Legally getting your hands on one, however, requires clearing a series of bureaucratic hurdles far stricter than in the United States and, for many, travelling great distances to reach the countrys lone gun store.
In fact, most of Mexicos 120 million inhabitants probably dont even know about the Directorate of Arms and Munitions Sales it is prohibited from advertising any of its goods, or the mere fact that it exists.
More:
http://www.seattletimes.com/business/at-mexicos-lone-gun-store-even-the-boss-discourages-sales/?utm_source=RSS&utm_medium=Referral&utm_campaign=RSS_business
Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)Why not try a version of it here? Who knows but it might improve things on the street?
hack89
(39,171 posts)more importantly, gun sales are convenient and common. The government does not make getting a legal gun an impossible task.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)...an inconvenient fact that certain posters are avoiding.
hack89
(39,171 posts)or at least points out that violence in a given society is a complex problem with many causes.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,263 posts)many different countries have written constitutions modeled on the U.S. Constitution, but most have left out anything like the 2nd Amendment. I guess they didn't think it worth having.
Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)eppur_se_muova
(36,263 posts)Generally, where modern constitutions refer to arms at all, the purpose is "to allow the government to regulate their use or to compel military service, not to provide a right to bear them".[2] Aside from that of the United States of America, other constitutions which historically guaranteed a right to bear arms are those of Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Liberia, Mexico, and Nicaragua.[4] Nearly all of these were modelled on that of the United States.[3] At present, out of the worlds nearly 200 constitutions, three still include a right to bear arms: Guatemala, Mexico, and the United States; of these three, only the last does not include explicit restrictive conditions.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_keep_and_bear_arms
emphasis mine
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)As the great writer Mark Twain once said, "Fine words butter no parsnips."
eppur_se_muova
(36,263 posts)... but that has yet to prove itself out.
I don't think many in Congress -- sadly, D's included -- really have the courage for a repeal, though a few do.
A *rewriting* of the 2A, in clearer, less ambiguous language, might have a chance of passing sooner.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Last edited Fri Aug 19, 2016, 03:41 PM - Edit history (1)
...of repealing the extant one, and passing a new one
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Oh, wait...