Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Feb 4, 2017, 01:13 PM Feb 2017

Green Party candidate Jill Stein says she's not to blame for Trump's fluke victory, Democrats...

Green Party candidate Jill Stein says she’s not to blame for Trump’s fluke victory, Democrats still doomed

Fiery Green nominee makes a coherent case about the many failures of American democracy. But she's not the answer

ANDREW O'HEHIR


Jill Stein really, really wants you to know that she’s not responsible for President Donald Trump. I had a chance to put that case to the Green Party’s 2016 presidential nominee when she visited Salon’s New York office on Friday, and she was more than ready for the accusation. Stein has a point — at least up to a point.

Her comeback is sensible enough: The math doesn’t work. To make the case that Stein played a definitive spoiler role in the 2016 presidential election, you have to assume that nearly all her voters (or at least nearly all of them in the key Midwestern states won by Trump) would have yanked the lever for Hillary Clinton if Stein hadn’t been on the ballot. No one can prove or disprove what might have happened in an alternate universe, but Stein is correct to say that isn’t a coherent or logical assumption. She says that polls of Green voters suggest that most of them would simply have stayed home, some would have voted for Trump or Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson, and fewer than one in three would have voted for Clinton. That almost certainly would not have been enough to alter the outcome.

So I concur that it’s not fair to point the finger at Stein and the Greens and say “You ruined everything!” She’s right to observe that the number of Democrats who didn’t bother to show up at all, or who crossed party lines to vote for Trump, vastly exceeds the number of potential Clinton voters who went Green instead. She’s also right that the Democratic Party’s default position after every electoral setback is to blame renegade leftists on the margins rather than confronting the consequences of several decades’ worth of rootless, rudderless ideological drift. To consider the “Ralph Nader factor” in isolation — as if it had no political causes and no historical context, and as if it could have been wished away — was not entirely fair in 2000 (when the case for it was a lot stronger), and is even less so in 2016.

But even the fact that Stein’s vote total was too small to make much difference, and that the Democrats’ major institutional and ideological problems lie elsewhere, speaks to the fundamental weakness of her position. On one hand, the Green Party’s optics are terrible, as we say these days. There’s no way around the fact that Stein’s modest vote totals in each of the three fateful states that put Trump over the top — Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — exceeded the razor-thin margins between Trump and Clinton.

more + 3 min video of interview
http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Green Party candidate Jill Stein says she's not to blame for Trump's fluke victory, Democrats... (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2017 OP
Jillenstein... wcmagumba Feb 2017 #1
She is crazy and needs to go home and stop ruining our lives bravenak Feb 2017 #2
IMHO, the problem with Jill Stein Uponthegears Feb 2017 #3
They certainly were Putin's useful idiots in the election. dalton99a Feb 2017 #8
You sure as hell didn't help matters, lady. Paladin Feb 2017 #4
Denial is not just a river in Africa Gothmog Feb 2017 #5
F*ck Jill Stein! BlueMTexpat Feb 2017 #6
Why doesn't the Green Party start with school boards and state legislators if they actually world wide wally Feb 2017 #7
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
2. She is crazy and needs to go home and stop ruining our lives
Sat Feb 4, 2017, 01:20 PM
Feb 2017

Blah blah blah, jill is a bad singer and a worse politician

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
3. IMHO, the problem with Jill Stein
Sat Feb 4, 2017, 01:20 PM
Feb 2017

and the Green Party in general, isn't that they cost Hillary the election (which I agree they did not), but that they aren't really "leftists" at all, past a slogan or two.

The Greens in Europe actually stand for a set of principles and are a real force. They aren't saying "we can't win, therefore you shouldn't participate." They're winning.

Here, they are just a fraud.

Paladin

(28,257 posts)
4. You sure as hell didn't help matters, lady.
Sat Feb 4, 2017, 01:29 PM
Feb 2017

Collect your Ralph Nader Democratic Spoiler certificate, and disappear......

world wide wally

(21,743 posts)
7. Why doesn't the Green Party start with school boards and state legislators if they actually
Sat Feb 4, 2017, 03:21 PM
Feb 2017

want to be a viable political party?
Just straight to POTUS?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Green Party candidate Jil...