Putting Scott Pruitt in charge of the EPA risks irreversible damage to the planet
As Oklahomas attorney general, Scott Pruitt has spent the last six years suing the federal Environmental Protection Agency over the extent of its authority, particularly its efforts to regulate the oil and gas industry and restrict coal-fired power plants. These industries belch out the greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming, yet Pruitt has led or been part of 14 lawsuits (most of them in concert with industry) challenging rules that limit them or otherwise protect the nations air and water.
Its hardly news that some public officials are shills or apologists for powerful polluting industries. But to select someone with a record like Pruitts to lead the EPA is mind-boggling, offensive and deeply worrisome. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee approved the appointment Thursday despite a boycott by Democratic members, but the full Senate should say no.
Yes, Trump won the election, and as president, hes entitled to appoint people who reflect his political views. But when the presidents policies and appointees pose such a fundamental threat to the nation, even a Senate controlled by his fellow Republicans whose first loyalty should be to the people of the United States must put the nations best interests ahead of party loyalty.
Pruitt shares Trumps ignorant skepticism about the global threat from climate change. Like Trump, Pruitt disbelieves the scientific consensus that human actions play a significant role in heating up the planet and that a crisis looms. That alone disqualifies him from running an agency charged with protecting the environment because if there is any single issue that poses an urgent threat to the planet in the century ahead, it is climate change.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-trump-pruitt-epa-senate-20170204-story.html
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)probably russian?
dhill926
(16,337 posts)either getting paid, or waiting to clean up their room...