Who'd Want to Limit Retirement Plans? House Republicans - NYT Editorial Board
There is no overstating how unprepared Americans are to retire. Nearly half of private-sector employees some 55 million people do not have an employer-provided retirement plan. Most of them are low- to middle-income earners who will end up relying on Social Security for between half and all of their income in retirement.
And yet, as early as Wednesday, House Republicans are expected to pass a measure to thwart efforts by California, Illinois and other states to establish basic retirement savings plans for employees at companies that do not offer such coverage. In California, for example, participating employees would have a small percentage of pay deducted from their paychecks, unless they opted out. Those amounts would be pooled and managed by investment professionals chosen by the state in a bidding process; the plan would be overseen by a board of government and business leaders appointed by the governor and the Legislature.
Financial firms claim that the plans represent unfair government competition. Thats false, but that doesnt seem to concern House Republicans as they use a fast-track process to derail the states plans, siding with the financial industry over ordinary savers.
First, under the plans, states establish the legal framework for deducting contributions from employees paychecks, but they do not run the plans. Second, state plans do not compete unfairly because mutual funds and other financial firms have not competed for the small-business market where employees without retirement coverage tend to work. If they had, tens of millions of Americans would not be without coverage, and the state plans probably wouldnt be needed.
more
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/opinion/whod-want-to-limit-retirement-plans-house-republicans.html?emc=edit_th_20170215&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=57435284