From Edmund Burke to Mr. Burns: In the age of Trump, conservative thought has died at last

[DonViejo]

SATURDAY, FEB 18, 2017 12:00 PM EST

Conservatism once had a coherent philosophy. After the neocons, the bigots and the neo-fascists, nothing's left

ANDREW O'HEHIR

One way to understand what we are witnessing, amid the national humiliation of Donald Trump’s presidency, is to see it as the total collapse of conservative ideology. That might seem like a strange claim in a year when the far right seems ascendant throughout the Western world, and when the Republican Party nominally controls the White House and both houses of Congress for the first time in a decade. But I think it’s accurate, and all the breathless Ayn Rand fanfics hidden away in the hard drive of Paul Ryan’s Windows Vista PC don’t make it less so. (It does not follow, by the way, that “liberal” ideology is in such great shape either, and the two phenomena are not unconnected. Topic for another time!)

As a political force, American conservative movement has been morally and philosophically bankrupt for decades, which is one of the big reasons we are where we are right now. Largely in the interest of preserving their own power and empowering a massive money-grab by the class they represent, Republicans have cobbled together cynical coalitions by trying to appease multiple constituencies with competing and often contradictory interests: Libertarians, the Christian right, the post-industrial white working class, finance capital and the billionaire caste. Those groups have literally nothing in common beyond a shared antipathy for … well, for something that cannot be precisely defined. They don’t like the idea of post-1960s Volvo-driving, latte-drinking liberal bicoastal cosmopolitanism, that much is for sure. But the specific things they hate about it are not the same, and the goals they seek are mutually incompatible and largely unachievable.

But behind that political devolution lies the ideological implosion that’s been coming a long time, longer than I can possibly summarize here. It’s safe to say that Edmund Burke and Alexander Hamilton, two 18th-century titans the modern conservative movement likes to cite as forebears, would be horrified by the limited, narrow-minded and intellectually inflexible nature of so-called conservative thought in the 21st century. How those guys would make sense of the fact that supposedly intelligent people who claim to share their lineage have hitched their wagons to the idiocy, mendacity and delusional thinking of the would-be autocrat in the White House — an implausible caricature of the stupefied mob democracy Burke and Hamilton hated and feared — I can’t begin to imagine.

Even so, the final stages of the collapse have arrived with startling suddenness. Just a few decades ago, William F. Buckley successfully appointed himself as the intellectual standard-bearer of the American right, in large part by purging overt white supremacists and conspiracy-minded ultra-nationalists from the mainstream conservative movement. Buckley was a slippery and devious character, and despite his command of classical languages and all that, was more like a guy who plays a first-rate intellect on TV than the real thing. Arguably his decision to drive the troglodytes from the temple was more a matter of political strategy than moral principle (although I believe he was genuinely ashamed of his early embrace of segregation).

In any event, racism, anti-Semitism, xenophobia and other forms of paranoid thought were never absent from American conservatism — as in the “Southern strategy” that got Richard Nixon elected in 1968, and made a big comeback during the great renaissance of the Reagan revolution. Those who expressed such views were expected to keep it clean, so to speak, and to observe rhetorical limits. Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas were welcomed at the country club; Klansmen and neo-Nazis and guys who handed out homemade brochures set in 8-point type about the Bilderberg Group were exiled to the strip mall. Immigration, always the great rift in conservative politics, was politely and pointedly ignored, like the ripping fart laid by the bank president’s wife at her garden party.

more
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/18/from-edmund-burke-to-mr-burns-in-the-age-of-trump-conservative-thought-has-died-at-last/

[muriel_volestrangler]

1. I get the feeling that Anton and much of the RW commenters on the web define their politics

by the maxim someone was using for the Republican Congress a few years ago: "against whatever the Democratic party is for, updated daily". But Anton has taken that further than congressional Republicans ever did, who'd stick with NATO, even if the mainstream Democrats thought the same way, or free trade. On forums that allow all points of political view, I see a lot of RWers who spend their whole time saying that anything a liberal says is, by definition, obviously evil and/or crazy. I've seen a few supporting Stalin in the last couple of days, since a liberal had already used Stalin as an example of how not to rule. I see them equating liberalism with Satanism. They call liberalism a mental illness, and think that actually deserves discussion.

It's not "if it's new, I'm against it". It's "if Hillary Clinton is for it, I'm against it". In a few cases that may be explicitly because of an unreasoning hatred for her; more generally, it's an unreasoning hatred of what a thoughtful, educated woman might say. There is, 99% of the time (the 1% being Conway/Coulter), a portion which is a man wanting women to be 2nd class people, and there is always an anti-intellectual drive to it, both in the amount of knowledge (it's amazing the number of times that giving links to facts is regarded as a despicable left-wing underhand tactic that loses the moral argument), and in the unwillingness to actually think an argument through.