Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(182,877 posts)
Sat Feb 18, 2017, 10:20 PM Feb 2017

35 U.S. psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers signed a letter to the editor

35 U.S. psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers signed a letter to the editor of The New York Times
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/psychiatrists-debate-weighing-in-on-trumps-mental-health/


In response to these efforts, Allen Frances, an emeritus psychiatrist at Duke University School of Medicine who helped write the standard manual on psychiatric disorders, wrote a separate letter to the Times denouncing attempts to diagnose the president as mentally ill. He explains that Trump lacks the “distress and impairment required to diagnose a mental illness,” adding that bad behavior and mental illness are not synonymous. “Psychiatric name-calling is a misguided way of countering Mr. Trump’s attack on democracy,” Frances wrote. Nevertheless, “he can, and should, be appropriately denounced for his ignorance, incompetence, impulsivity and pursuit of dictatorial powers.”

Historically, psychiatrists have adhered to an ethics dictum known as the Goldwater rule, which appeared in the first edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s code of ethics in 1973. It evolved out of an incident involving presidential candidate Barry Goldwater: In 1964 Fact magazine polled 12,356 psychiatrists on Goldwater’s mental fitness to be president and published an article stating that 1,189 of the 2,417 who responded deemed him psychologically unfit for the job. (Goldwater later won a libel suit against the magazine.)



The mental health professionals writing in the Times, however, felt compelled to speak out: “We fear that too much is at stake to be silent any longer.” Susan Radant, a psychoanalyst and clinical psychologist and director of the Seattle Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, says she was motivated to sign by her worries about Trump’s competence, including his emotional stability, integrity and honesty. “I am hoping this letter will inspire both citizens and, particularly, the Congress to do their jobs,” she wrote in an e-mail, “and step in before our country and the world are permanently damaged.”

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
35 U.S. psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers signed a letter to the editor (Original Post) underpants Feb 2017 OP
I dont buy this argument about the diagnosis drray23 Feb 2017 #1

drray23

(7,637 posts)
1. I dont buy this argument about the diagnosis
Sat Feb 18, 2017, 10:32 PM
Feb 2017

For usual people, I can see why a psychiatrist would need to carefully interview that person to assess whether or not they have a mental disorder. Donald Trump has already provided them plenty of material. What would they be able to want to do to solidify their diagnostic ?
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»35 U.S. psychiatrists, ps...