A Positive Review of the Bill Clinton Presidency
http://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/marchaprilmay-2017/a-consequential-presidency/#.WM_xjuSvzhY.twitter
At this moment in early 2017, Bill and Hillary are taking a no doubt much-needed hiatus from the political limelight. But as the 2016 campaign showed, Bill Clintons legacy as president still shapes our politics. Along with Barack Obamas presidencywhich was, in domestic policy, essentially an extension of Clintonsit will be a reference point in the Democrats debates about how to regroup and go forward. Michael Tomaskys Bill Clinton, the latest volume in the American Presidents Series of Times Books biographies, deserves to be widely read, for its insights about the recent pastand the near future.
Tomaskys is the best short biography of the forty-second president we have. Clintons rich life and momentous presidency would seem to defy encapsulation in 150 pagesthe typical length of books in this seriesbut with his economy of prose, Tomasky manages to hit most of the big moments and air most of the key debates. He moves chronologically through Clintons life (the pre-presidential years deftly shoehorned into one chapter, the 1992 campaign into another), covering foreign policy and domestic policy, scandal and pseudo scandal. He does so with a literary style that is fluid, engaging, judicious, often witty, sometimes barbed, and above all deeply informed.
(snip)
In the end, Clinton did much more than survive. He made the Democratic Party viable again in presidential elections. He reoriented liberalism, retaining its core commitments to a mixed economy, a welfare state, civil rights, civil liberties, and an internationalist foreign policywhile also acknowledging where its past policies on welfare, crime, and other issues had lost the confidence of the American people. He recognized the coming of globalization and sought new policies to deal with its challenges. His programs contributedhow much, exactly, is impossible to sayto peace and shared prosperity, declines in violent crime and out-of-wedlock births, and a liberalizing national temper on culture war issues. Race relations improved steadily, according to both whites and blacks.
To achieve all this, Clinton had to make concessions to conservatives. Sometimes this meant shameful opportunism (calling for public school kids to wear uniforms) or dubious compromises (giving the GOP a capital gains tax cut) or the articulation of traditional moral positions that rankled liberals (support for the death penalty). Yet without these gestures, Clinton would never have gained support from Republicans in government. As important, he wouldnt have gained the immense support from the people, including many conservatives, that he enjoyed.
The whole piece is worth a read. I do think Bill gets bashed more than he should around here and by a lot of Dems. I know I've complained about his policies too. But we have to put him in perspective.