Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,526 posts)
Fri Jul 7, 2017, 09:05 AM Jul 2017

Donald Trump savages the media but without their fawning he would not be president

7 JULY 2017
His unorthodox campaign was aided and abetted by journalists across the political spectrum.

BY
MEHDI HASAN


Fake. Fraudulent. Dishonest. Disgusting. Corrupt. Sleazy. Scum. Losers. Enemies of the people. I could fill up this column with quotes from the so-called leader of the free world denouncing . . . the free press. The sheer volume and intensity of his rhetorical assault on the Fourth Estate is unprecedented. “No president has ever established as volatile a relationship with the American media as quickly as Donald Trump,” observed the media historian Mark Feldstein in April.

Forget Isis, North Korea, even the Democrats. For the US president, the media is Enemy Number One. “I have a running war with the media,” he has proudly proclaimed. In his first full day in office, Trump used a visit to the CIA headquarters to berate journalists for being “among the most dishonest human beings on earth”. In his first solo news conference as president, in February, he spent more than an hour inveighing against media “lies” and “fake news”, claiming the press was “out of control”.

And in recent weeks, with his approval ratings in freefall and his domestic agenda stalled, Trump has ramped up his attacks on his critics in the media via a series of increasingly personal and angry tweets. He called MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski “low IQ” and “dumb as a rock” and (falsely) claimed she was “bleeding badly from a facelift” on a visit to his Mar-a-Lago resort. He posted a doctored video in which he can be seen physically attacking a man with a CNN logo digitally imposed on his face. (Incitement to violence, anyone?)

“To President Trump,” began a recent front-page news story in the Washington Post, “no place is more comfortable than the middle of a fight”. Yet his growing and bitter conflict with the media is all the more bizarre given Trump would not be residing within the White House today were it not for the media. His unorthodox presidential campaign was aided and abetted, wittingly and unwittingly, by journalists and news organisations across the political spectrum.

More:
http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/observations/2017/07/donald-trump-savages-media-without-their-fawning-he-would-not-be

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Nitram

(22,794 posts)
1. The media (unless you consuider Fox and right wing tklk radio to be "the media") did NOT
Fri Jul 7, 2017, 09:30 AM
Jul 2017

"fawn" over Trump. They reported every stupid, childish, disgusting, shocking thing he did and said, assuming that the criticism would prevent his election. It made no difference. Stop blaming "the media" for everything that goes wrong. Please provide examples of the MSM "fawning" over Trump if you really believe that to be true.

Judi Lynn

(160,526 posts)
2. The media fawned over Trump's airstrikes in Syria. Are we really doing this again?
Fri Jul 7, 2017, 09:57 AM
Jul 2017

The media fawned over Trump's airstrikes in Syria. Are we really doing this again?
Margaret Sullivan
The Washington Post
April 10, 2017 10:04 AM

The cruise missiles struck, and many in the mainstream media fawned.

"I think Donald Trump became president of the United States last night," declared Fareed Zakaria on CNN, after the firing of 59 missiles at a Syrian military airfield late Thursday night. (His words sounded familiar, since CNN's Van Jones made a nearly identical pronouncement after Trump's first address to Congress.)

"On Syria attack, Trump's heart came first," read a New York Times headline. "President Trump has done the right thing and I salute him for it," wrote the Wall Street Journal's Bret Stephens - a frequent Trump critic and Pulitzer Prize-winning conservative columnist. He added: "Now destroy the Assad regime for good."

Brian Williams, on MSNBC, seemed mesmerized by the images of the strikes provided by the Pentagon. He used the word "beautiful" three times and alluded to a Leonard Cohen lyric — "I am guided by the beauty of our weapons" — without apparent irony.

More:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-trump-syria-airstrikes-media-praise-20170410-story.html


~ ~ ~ ~ ~


MARCH 1 2017 1:42 AM
The Night Cable Pundits Fell Over Themselves to Declare Trump “Presidential”
By Will Oremus


. . .

On Tuesday night, Donald Trump managed to speak for an entire hour without sounding like an unhinged demagogue. For that, he was hailed by TV pundits across the spectrum who acted as though he’d just singlehandedly defeated ISIS and restored the fortunes of the American middle class, instead of simply reading from a script that said he would do those things.

Why? Because it’s in their nature, and the nature of the form, to get caught up in the moment—and to elevate perception over reality.

“He became president of the United States in that moment—period,” CNN’s Van Jones raved, referring to the set piece in which Trump crassly turned an American sailor’s death in a botched military raid into an occasion for a thunderous, patriotic ovation. Never mind that just hours earlier, Trump had passed the buck for that same raid to his predecessor and laid the sailor’s death at the feet of his generals. The important thing, in the minds of the sort of people who make a living on cable news, was that Trump looked presidential. “That was one of the most extraordinary moments you have ever seen in American politics,” Jones added, throwing in the word “period” again for good measure. And this was the liberal activist on CNN’s panel.

Jones’ lavish praise of the president set the tone for his colleagues’ commentary. Reaganite troll Jeffrey Lord said that Trump “walked in as the winner of a controversial election” and “walked out as the president.” Former Republican Sen. Rick Santorum called it “a healing moment for everybody.” Even David Axelrod, the Democratic operative who orchestrated Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns, said “you’d have to be dead not to appreciate the moment, the change we just saw.” (CNN was not alone in this: NBC’s analysts were all aglow in the wake of Trump’s speech, and Fox News’ personalities were practically doing backflips around the studio.) Keep in mind this was all on a night in which Trump—fine, without raising his voice—detailed grotesque plans to create an office dedicated exclusively to “victims of immigration crime.”


More:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-trump-syria-airstrikes-media-praise-20170410-story.html


~ ~ ~ ~ ~

03/01/2016 05:35 am ET | Updated Mar 01, 2016
CBS Chief Les Moonves Says Trump’s ‘Damn Good’ For Business
“Sorry. It’s a terrible thing to say. But, bring it on, Donald. Keep going.”
By Nick Visser

There’s a reason why Donald Trump gets more minutes during almost every debate or can seemingly call into “The Late Show“ or “The View“ whenever he has a racist remark and expect the media to do whatever he likes. According to the head of CBS, the foul-mouthed presidential candidate is “damn good” for the network and the “money’s rolling in” thanks to his antics.

Les Moonves, executive chairman and CEO of CBS, made the comments during a speech at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom Conference in San Francisco, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

“I’ve never seen anything like this, and this going to be a very good year for us,” he said at the event. “Sorry. It’s a terrible thing to say. But, bring it on, Donald. Keep going.”

The outlet notes Moonves said ad sales this season have been particularly strong, partly due to an election cycle rapt with attacks and “bomb throwing” that keeps Americans interested.

More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/les-moonves-donald-trump_us_56d52ce8e4b03260bf780275


~ ~ ~ ~ ~

How the Media Is Fueling Donald Trump’s Campaign
by PERRY BACON JR.
JUL 22 2015, 7:34 AM ET

Donald Trump’s surge in the Republican primary is being helped by an unlikely ally: the press.

With 16 Republican candidates running for president, most contenders are struggling to get media coverage, which helps make them better-known to voters and spread their message. That hasn't been a problem for Trump.

Data provided by Google to the journalism site FiveThirtyEight found that 46 percent of the media coverage over the last month about the GOP candidates was about Trump, as measured by articles that appeared in Google News. That's compared to 13 percent of articles about Jeb Bush, who got the second-most attention.

Trump, in a period from June 14 to July 12, received more coverage than the combined total of Bush, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, generally considered the three leading GOP candidates, according to Google.

More:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/how-media-fueling-donald-trumps-campaign-n395821


ETC.

Nitram

(22,794 posts)
4. The OP refers to the campaign - "...Donald Trump wouldn't be president."
Fri Jul 7, 2017, 11:35 AM
Jul 2017

Reporting on Trump's sins is not "fawning."

dalton99a

(81,468 posts)
3. His daily diversions also drowned out any critical reporting/discussion
Fri Jul 7, 2017, 10:34 AM
Jul 2017

He knew Americans couldn't pay attention longer than a goldfish

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Donald Trump savages the ...