Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
California Says Nestl Didn't Have The Rights To Take Millions Of Gallons Of Water For Bottling
The Swiss food giant has been bottling millions of gallons of water from the mountains of Southern California, despite lacking the rights to it, the state says.
Posted on December 22, 2017, at 9:36 p.m.
Jim Dalrymple IIBuzzFeed News Reporter
For decades, Nestlé has been pumping tens of millions of gallons of water each year out of the mountains of Southern California, then bottling it as Arrowhead Mountain Spring Water.
The bottled water generates millions of dollars in sales each year for Nestlé, but state officials now say the Swiss food giant has been taking far more water than it had the rights to. That conclusion, presented in a report this week from the State Water Resources Control Board, may ultimately require Nestlé to dramatically reduce the amount of water it takes from the San Bernardino National Forest, and represents a victory for critics who raised alarm about the operation during California's recent crushing drought.
Nestlé's claim to the water in the mountains of Southern California dates back to 1865, when a man built a health spa in the area. Those rights were transferred to different organizations for decades until they ultimately fell into the hands of the bottled water company.
Nestlé has defended its use of the water, pointing to a number of rulings and agreements over decades that it says give it the rights to continue collecting water, including a case in 1931, the report states.
More:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimdalrympleii/california-says-nestle-didnt-have-the-rights-to-take?utm_term=.re05zyJ3j#.rhWlM1LYo
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 2422 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Says Nestl Didn't Have The Rights To Take Millions Of Gallons Of Water For Bottling (Original Post)
Judi Lynn
Dec 2017
OP
He's not a human. He's the CEO of one the largest multi-national corporations on the planet. He ...
marble falls
Dec 2017
#8
marble falls
(57,333 posts)1. Nestles says we have no right to water....
Lucky Luciano
(11,262 posts)4. Where did he get his human suit?
Not very convincing.
marble falls
(57,333 posts)5. I know, right? They'll be going after clean air next....
Its a convincing vampire capitalist suit.
niyad
(113,598 posts)7. FU, you disgusting pretend human.
marble falls
(57,333 posts)8. He's not a human. He's the CEO of one the largest multi-national corporations on the planet. He ...
only plays a human in front of the press.
niyad
(113,598 posts)9. sadly, you are quite correct.
2naSalit
(86,822 posts)2. K&R
elleng
(131,176 posts)3. It's not only California.
Why Nestle pays next to nothing for Michigan groundwater
http://www.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2016/12/why_nestle_pays_next_to_nothin.html
niyad
(113,598 posts)6. CA is just now noticing this?