Joe Conason: The High Court’s Supremely Unethical Activists
The High Courts Supremely Unethical Activists
Posted on Apr 4, 2012
By Joe Conason
How the Supreme Court majority will rule on President Obamas Affordable Care Act may well have been foretold months or perhaps years agonot so much by their questions during argument this week, as by their flagrant displays of bias outside the court, where certain justices regularly behave as dubiously as any sleazy officeholder.
While the public awaits the high courts judgment on the constitutionality of health care reform, it is worth remembering how cheaply Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas in particular have sullied the integrity of their lifetime appointments, and how casually Chief Justice John Roberts and their other colleagues tolerate such outrages.
What is most scandalous in Washington, as a wise pundit once suggested, are the things politicians do that are perfectly legal but shouldnt bean observation that applies with particular force to the Supreme Court, which is not subject to the ethics restrictions applied to lesser judges on the federal bench. That was why Scalia and Thomas, for instance, could appear as guests of honor at a fundraising dinner for the right-wing Federalist Societywhich was sponsored by Bancroft PLLC, a major firm involved in litigation against the Affordable Care Acton the very same day last November that they reviewed an appeal brief on the case from Paul Clement, the Bancroft attorney whose arguments they received so cordially this week.
In fact, Clement sat at a table sandwiched between the two justices. Scalia was seated with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who had told the Federalists that he would rely on them to help undo the affront represented by health care reform. And for good measure, Justice Samuel Alito enjoyed the event at another table nearby.
If they were mere federal district or appeals judges, neither Scalia nor Thomas would have been permitted to attend the Federalist celebration, while Alitos attendance would have been questionable, to say the least. But members of the right-wing majority abuse their immunity from ethics regulation without sanction. Poised to reject the Affordable Care Act with the kind of sweeping opinion that could tear down decades of commerce clause jurisprudence, they merit the sharp scrutiny of their motives and conduct that they have largely escaped until now, even as they drift further and further toward the corporate right.
more...
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_high_courts_supremely_unethical_activists_20120404/?ln
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)if the "left leaning" justices did this kind of crape, there WOULD be LOUD calls for impeaching them.
The rs do this crape, nothing to see here, move on ...
barbtries
(28,789 posts)Get out the Vote. it is important.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)It lost every scrap of respect it may have earned when it appointed our president for us. Since then, it has become a laughing stock among people who pay attention. Now it is filled with 5 unelected clowns who think they can create laws from the bench.
They took on powers that were never assigned to them in the Constitution and have welded that power like malicious royals.
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)ellenfl
(8,660 posts)against striking the aca. lord knows they've given enough reason to impeach.
ellen fl
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Seriously WTF?
These guys have been so compromised there is no hope of an actual constitutional decision.
Liberal Gramma
(1,471 posts)If we controlled the House and a filibuster-proof Senate, we could impeach Scalia, Alito and Thomas.