Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,261 posts)
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 01:01 AM Jul 2019

With gerrymandering ruling,the Supreme Court could have saved democracy. It didn't. (Whitmire/al.com

Updated Jul 10, 2019; Posted Jul 10, 2019

By Kyle Whitmire | kwhitmire@al.com

This is an opinion column.

Jefferson County had been slowly shifting toward the Democrats, and by the 2008 election, it finally passed the threshold. President Barack Obama prevailed there comfortably, and Republicans have struggled to win a countywide race there since. In the middle of red Alabama, there was a little dollop of solid blue.

And yet, the county’s delegation in the Alabama Legislature — crucial to passing local bills and controlling the county’s legislative agenda — remains in Republican control, not because of voters splitting their tickets, but because of how the district lines are drawn.

Some of those legislative districts look outright weird. For two of them, you about have to break out a magnifying glass to see where they touch Jefferson County at all.

Rep. Tim Wadsworth serves in that delegation, even though he lives an hour’s drive away from downtown Birmingham. His district is mostly in Walker and Winston Counties.

Rep. Kyle South is part of the delegation, too, even though he lives an hour and a half away in Fayette. His district stretches from Jefferson County all the way to the Mississippi line.

Both lawmakers’ districts put a toe across the Jefferson County line, and under Alabama’s legislative rules, that makes them members of the delegation — and gives Republicans a delegation majority in a Democratic county.
***
more: https://www.al.com/news/2019/07/with-gerrymandering-ruling-the-supreme-court-could-have-saved-democracy-it-didnt.html





(This was published in our local paper 5 July; al.com didn't make it available online right away.)

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
With gerrymandering ruling,the Supreme Court could have saved democracy. It didn't. (Whitmire/al.com (Original Post) eppur_se_muova Jul 2019 OP
This Supreme Court is against democracy. nt trev Jul 2019 #1
This SCOTUS is very political and not objective. BigmanPigman Jul 2019 #2

BigmanPigman

(51,589 posts)
2. This SCOTUS is very political and not objective.
Sun Jul 14, 2019, 08:48 PM
Jul 2019

We need to increase the number or we are screwed for 30 more years.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»With gerrymandering rulin...