New Analysis, 17 MILLION People Removed from Voter Rolls, 2016-2018: Brennan Ctr for Justice
'Voter Purge Rates Remain High, Analysis Finds.' New data reveal that counties with a history of voter discrimination have continued purging people from the rolls at elevated rates. Aug. 1, 2019, Brennan Center for Justice.
Using data released by the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in June, a new Brennan Center analysis has found that between 2016 and 2018, counties with a history of voter discrimination have continued purging people from the rolls at much higher rates than other counties.
This phenomenon began after the Supreme Courts 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, a decision that severely weakened the protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Brennan Center first identified this troubling voter purge trend in a major report released in July 2018. Before the Shelby County decision, Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act required jurisdictions with a history of discrimination to submit proposed changes in voting procedures to the Department of Justice or a federal court for approval, a process known as preclearance.
After analyzing the 2019 EAC data, we found:
At least 17 million voters were purged nationwide between 2016 and 2018, similar to the number we saw between 2014 and 2016, but considerably higher than we saw between 2006 and 2008;
The median purge rate over the 20162018 period in jurisdictions previously subject to preclearance was 40 percent higher than the purge rate in jurisdictions that were not covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act;
If purge rates in the counties that were covered by Section 5 were the same as the rates in non-Section 5 counties, as many as 1.1 million fewer individuals would have been removed from voter rolls between 2016 and 2018.
- Methodology: Every two years, the EAC administers a survey to election officials around the country known as the Election Administration and Voting Survey (EAVS). The survey includes a host of questions about the state of voter registration in the jurisdiction and the experience of the most recent federal election. Jurisdictions are requested to report on information including how many new registrations occurred between the federal elections, the number of ballots cast on election day, and the number of polling sites that were open on election day. The jurisdictions are also asked to report how many voters were removed from the registration rolls or purged over the two-year period that preceded the most recent federal election. These data formed the backbone of our statistical analysis in last years report, and we use them again here...
- Why purges can be problematic: To be sure, there are many good reasons for a voter to be purged. For instance, if a voter moves from Georgia to New York, they are no longer eligible to cast a ballot in the Peach State. As such, they should be removed from Georgias voter rolls. Similarly, voters who have passed away should be removed from the rolls. Reasonable voter list maintenance ensures voter rolls remain up to date.
Problems arise when states remove voters who are still eligible to vote. States rely on faulty data that purport to show that a voter has moved to another state. Oftentimes, these data get people mixed up. In big states like California and Texas, multiple individuals can have the same name and date of birth, making it hard to be sure that the right voter is being purged when perfect data are unavailable.
Troublingly, minority voters are more likely to share names than white voters, potentially exposing them to a greater risk of being purged. Voters often do not realize they have been purged until they try to cast a ballot on Election Day after its already too late. If those voters live in a state without election day registration, they are often prevented from participating in that election...
- Approximately 17 million purged between 2016 and 2018: The map below shows the purge rates for the counties that reported their information to the EAC. Some counties did not report their information. Because North Dakota does not have voter registration, it does not have a voter purge rate. Therefore, the state is grayed out below to mirror the non-reporting jurisdictions in Texas and Alabama...
MORE, https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/voter-purge-rates-remain-high-analysis-finds
Runningdawg
(4,526 posts)The letter stated I was being removed because I was inactive, even though I have voted every time the polls were open in Tulsa Co. OK for the last 40 years. I have moved 3xs and each time, I went in person to the county election board to change my address. The letter I received had no return address. Most people would have thrown it in the trash.
Go, IN PERSON to your election board and check your eligibility, at the very least, before the cutoff date to register before each and every presidential primary. They will do anything to take away your vote, don't let them.
appalachiablue
(41,178 posts)Duppers
(28,127 posts)Please consider sharing this advice in an OP for more views.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)Just my two cents. It's the other side of the coin... when Republicans say "dead people are voting".. they aren't voting, they are just still on the rolls.