Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 09:14 AM Apr 2012

Understanding the Right's Fear of Sex: How America's Absurd Oral Sex and Sodomy Laws Were Overturned

http://www.alternet.org/sex/154847/understanding_the_right%27s_fear_of_sex%3A_how_america%27s_absurd_oral_sex_and_sodomy_laws_were_overturned/

It might seem utterly absurd that oral sex was once illegal in the U.S.—as it was in every state before 1961. Until a landmark Supreme Court decision in 2003, though, it remained illegal in 13 states, along with anal sex (and in some, sex-toy use). Nine states banned it for everyone, and four restricted their laws to gays and lesbians. Though the laws were rarely enforced, they indelibly defined gay men and lesbians as criminals, and thus were used to justify discrimination. In 1991, Georgia Attorney General Michael Bowers cited the state’s sodomy law when rescinding a job offer to a recent law-school graduate after he found out she was a lesbian.

That Court decision, Lawrence v. Texas, still reverberates today. For the Christian right, it ranks with Roe v. Wade as the most odious Supreme Court ruling of all time. When right-wingers fume about “activist judges creating ‘rights’ not enumerated in the Constitution,” they usually mean privacy—specifically, sexual privacy.

To more rational souls, the decision’s logic is screamingly obvious. What could be a more unconstitutionally “unreasonable search” than cops battering into your bedroom to bust you for performing commonplace sex acts?

Yet the concept of a constitutional right to privacy has only become part of American jurisprudence in the last century, based on the idea that it is implicit in the "penumbra" of the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court extended privacy rights to sexuality in the 1965 Griswold v. Connecticut decision, which overturned a law prohibiting married couples from buying contraceptives, and to unmarried couples in 1972. Griswold was the precedent for legalizing abortion in 1973.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Understanding the Right's Fear of Sex: How America's Absurd Oral Sex and Sodomy Laws Were Overturned (Original Post) xchrom Apr 2012 OP
Man, oh man... damyank913 Apr 2012 #1
You need to work on your technique TrogL Apr 2012 #5
What's a "penumbra"? Sounds dirty. I wanna try it. nt DCKit Apr 2012 #2
Non total shadow. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2012 #4
The federal government still enforces an oral/sodomy law, re UCMJ, Article 125. n/t sarge43 Apr 2012 #3
 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
4. Non total shadow.
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 10:49 PM
Apr 2012

Umbra is shadow in Latin. Pen means "around".
Penumbra is a lighter shadow, as in astronomy when you have complete shadows and partial shadows during eclipses.

Peninsula -- Pen is around, insula is island. So it's almost an island.

Penumbra is a legal term in reference to rights of privacy.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Understanding the Right's...