Trump's attack on the debate commission is an attack on the election itself
By John C. Danforth
John C. Danforth, a Republican, represented Missouri in the U.S. Senate for three terms and has served on the Commission on Presidential Debates since 1994.
Like all members of the Commission on Presidential Debates, I have maintained a strict vow of silence regarding my personal feelings about the current presidential campaign. Now, however, that President Trump and some of his ardent supporters have attacked the commissions integrity, I feel compelled to respond.
The presidents apparent strategy is to challenge the validity of the election should he lose. We saw this strategy initially in his claims that mail-in ballots are the tools for massive election fraud. Now we see it as well in his assertion that the debates have been rigged by the commission to favor former vice president Joe Biden.
The presidents campaign attacked moderator Chris Wallace as terrible and biased. Its senior adviser, Steve Cortes, accused the commission of a scheme to protect their preferred candidate, and one of Trumps strongest champions, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), branded the commission a disgrace. The claim is that the commission is composed of Democrats and never-Trump Republicans who through their selection of moderators, their decision to make the town-hall meeting virtual, and (in the latest accusation) through the moderators selection of subjects for the final debate have corruptly tilted the scale.
As for the commissions makeup, I can only speak for myself. I am a Republican who has carried my partys banner in six statewide elections and has supported countless Republican candidates over many years. I also have been highly critical of President Trump.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/commission-presidential-debates-trump-election-threat/2020/10/20/44d42db8-1310-11eb-ad6f-36c93e6e94fb_story.html